UefiCpuPkg/Library/MpInitLib/MpLib.c | 21 +++++++++++++-------- 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
For some special platforms (such as Ovmf), it is possible
that, some APs start up *and finish* before the remaining
APs not start up *at all*. In this case, the enhance
solution by changes 0594ec41 not works as expected.
This change remove check CpuMpData->CpuCount logic to let old
solution still workable if platform owner still set a long
time for PcdCpuApInitTimeOutInMicroSeconds. It's platform
owner's response to decide which solution to use.
Cc: Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>
Cc: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Cc: Jeff Fan <vanjeff_919@hotmail.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
---
UefiCpuPkg/Library/MpInitLib/MpLib.c | 21 +++++++++++++--------
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/UefiCpuPkg/Library/MpInitLib/MpLib.c b/UefiCpuPkg/Library/MpInitLib/MpLib.c
index 48f930b..18060fd 100644
--- a/UefiCpuPkg/Library/MpInitLib/MpLib.c
+++ b/UefiCpuPkg/Library/MpInitLib/MpLib.c
@@ -936,15 +936,20 @@ WakeUpAP (
}
if (CpuMpData->InitFlag == ApInitConfig) {
//
- // Wait for one potential AP waken up in one specified period
+ // Here support two methods to collect AP count through adjust
+ // PcdCpuApInitTimeOutInMicroSeconds values.
//
- if (CpuMpData->CpuCount == 0) {
- TimedWaitForApFinish (
- CpuMpData,
- PcdGet32 (PcdCpuMaxLogicalProcessorNumber) - 1,
- PcdGet32 (PcdCpuApInitTimeOutInMicroSeconds)
- );
- }
+ // one way is set a value to just let the first AP to start the
+ // initialization, then through the later while loop to wait all Aps
+ // finsh the initialization.
+ // The other way is set a value to let all APs finished the initialzation.
+ // In this case, the later while loop is useless.
+ //
+ TimedWaitForApFinish (
+ CpuMpData,
+ PcdGet32 (PcdCpuMaxLogicalProcessorNumber) - 1,
+ PcdGet32 (PcdCpuApInitTimeOutInMicroSeconds)
+ );
while (CpuMpData->MpCpuExchangeInfo->NumApsExecuting != 0) {
CpuPause();
--
2.7.0.windows.1
_______________________________________________
edk2-devel mailing list
edk2-devel@lists.01.org
https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/edk2-devel
On 10/26/17 07:59, Eric Dong wrote: > For some special platforms (such as Ovmf), it is possible > that, some APs start up *and finish* before the remaining > APs not start up *at all*. In this case, the enhance (1) I think the word "not" should be removed from the above line, so that we get: "some APs start up *and finish* before the remaining APs [] start up *at all*". (2) For the subject line: can we add "AP counting" or "AP collection" somehow? For example: UefiCpuPkg/MpInitLib: Keep compatible with former AP counting solution. I don't insist, but I think these changes would improve the commit message. They can be implemented before pushing. Either way, Reviewed-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com> Thank you for the quick update, Eric and Jeff! Laszlo > solution by changes 0594ec41 not works as expected. > > This change remove check CpuMpData->CpuCount logic to let old > solution still workable if platform owner still set a long > time for PcdCpuApInitTimeOutInMicroSeconds. It's platform > owner's response to decide which solution to use. > > Cc: Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu.ni@intel.com> > Cc: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com> > Cc: Jeff Fan <vanjeff_919@hotmail.com> > Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1 > Signed-off-by: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com> > --- > UefiCpuPkg/Library/MpInitLib/MpLib.c | 21 +++++++++++++-------- > 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/UefiCpuPkg/Library/MpInitLib/MpLib.c b/UefiCpuPkg/Library/MpInitLib/MpLib.c > index 48f930b..18060fd 100644 > --- a/UefiCpuPkg/Library/MpInitLib/MpLib.c > +++ b/UefiCpuPkg/Library/MpInitLib/MpLib.c > @@ -936,15 +936,20 @@ WakeUpAP ( > } > if (CpuMpData->InitFlag == ApInitConfig) { > // > - // Wait for one potential AP waken up in one specified period > + // Here support two methods to collect AP count through adjust > + // PcdCpuApInitTimeOutInMicroSeconds values. > // > - if (CpuMpData->CpuCount == 0) { > - TimedWaitForApFinish ( > - CpuMpData, > - PcdGet32 (PcdCpuMaxLogicalProcessorNumber) - 1, > - PcdGet32 (PcdCpuApInitTimeOutInMicroSeconds) > - ); > - } > + // one way is set a value to just let the first AP to start the > + // initialization, then through the later while loop to wait all Aps > + // finsh the initialization. > + // The other way is set a value to let all APs finished the initialzation. > + // In this case, the later while loop is useless. > + // > + TimedWaitForApFinish ( > + CpuMpData, > + PcdGet32 (PcdCpuMaxLogicalProcessorNumber) - 1, > + PcdGet32 (PcdCpuApInitTimeOutInMicroSeconds) > + ); > > while (CpuMpData->MpCpuExchangeInfo->NumApsExecuting != 0) { > CpuPause(); > _______________________________________________ edk2-devel mailing list edk2-devel@lists.01.org https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/edk2-devel
Laszlo, Update both and pushed the change at 86121874. Thanks, Eric > -----Original Message----- > From: edk2-devel [mailto:edk2-devel-bounces@lists.01.org] On Behalf Of > Laszlo Ersek > Sent: Thursday, October 26, 2017 4:26 PM > To: Dong, Eric <eric.dong@intel.com>; edk2-devel@lists.01.org > Cc: Ni, Ruiyu <ruiyu.ni@intel.com> > Subject: Re: [edk2] [Patch] UefiCpuPkg/MpInitLib: Keep compatible with > former solution. > > On 10/26/17 07:59, Eric Dong wrote: > > For some special platforms (such as Ovmf), it is possible that, some > > APs start up *and finish* before the remaining APs not start up *at > > all*. In this case, the enhance > > (1) I think the word "not" should be removed from the above line, so that we > get: "some APs start up *and finish* before the remaining APs [] start up *at > all*". > > (2) For the subject line: can we add "AP counting" or "AP collection" > somehow? For example: > > UefiCpuPkg/MpInitLib: Keep compatible with former AP counting solution. > > > I don't insist, but I think these changes would improve the commit message. > They can be implemented before pushing. Either way, > > Reviewed-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com> > > Thank you for the quick update, Eric and Jeff! > Laszlo > > > solution by changes 0594ec41 not works as expected. > > > > This change remove check CpuMpData->CpuCount logic to let old solution > > still workable if platform owner still set a long time for > > PcdCpuApInitTimeOutInMicroSeconds. It's platform owner's response to > > decide which solution to use. > > > > Cc: Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu.ni@intel.com> > > Cc: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com> > > Cc: Jeff Fan <vanjeff_919@hotmail.com> > > Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1 > > Signed-off-by: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com> > > --- > > UefiCpuPkg/Library/MpInitLib/MpLib.c | 21 +++++++++++++-------- > > 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/UefiCpuPkg/Library/MpInitLib/MpLib.c > > b/UefiCpuPkg/Library/MpInitLib/MpLib.c > > index 48f930b..18060fd 100644 > > --- a/UefiCpuPkg/Library/MpInitLib/MpLib.c > > +++ b/UefiCpuPkg/Library/MpInitLib/MpLib.c > > @@ -936,15 +936,20 @@ WakeUpAP ( > > } > > if (CpuMpData->InitFlag == ApInitConfig) { > > // > > - // Wait for one potential AP waken up in one specified period > > + // Here support two methods to collect AP count through adjust > > + // PcdCpuApInitTimeOutInMicroSeconds values. > > // > > - if (CpuMpData->CpuCount == 0) { > > - TimedWaitForApFinish ( > > - CpuMpData, > > - PcdGet32 (PcdCpuMaxLogicalProcessorNumber) - 1, > > - PcdGet32 (PcdCpuApInitTimeOutInMicroSeconds) > > - ); > > - } > > + // one way is set a value to just let the first AP to start the > > + // initialization, then through the later while loop to wait all Aps > > + // finsh the initialization. > > + // The other way is set a value to let all APs finished the initialzation. > > + // In this case, the later while loop is useless. > > + // > > + TimedWaitForApFinish ( > > + CpuMpData, > > + PcdGet32 (PcdCpuMaxLogicalProcessorNumber) - 1, > > + PcdGet32 (PcdCpuApInitTimeOutInMicroSeconds) > > + ); > > > > while (CpuMpData->MpCpuExchangeInfo->NumApsExecuting != 0) { > > CpuPause(); > > > > _______________________________________________ > edk2-devel mailing list > edk2-devel@lists.01.org > https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/edk2-devel _______________________________________________ edk2-devel mailing list edk2-devel@lists.01.org https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/edk2-devel
© 2016 - 2025 Red Hat, Inc.