From nobody Fri Dec 27 01:31:42 2024 Delivered-To: importer@patchew.org Received-SPF: none (zoho.com: 198.145.21.10 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of lists.01.org) client-ip=198.145.21.10; envelope-from=edk2-devel-bounces@lists.01.org; helo=ml01.01.org; Authentication-Results: mx.zohomail.com; spf=none (zoho.com: 198.145.21.10 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of lists.01.org) smtp.mailfrom=edk2-devel-bounces@lists.01.org Return-Path: Received: from ml01.01.org (ml01.01.org [198.145.21.10]) by mx.zohomail.com with SMTPS id 1501887656425516.6534740964898; Fri, 4 Aug 2017 16:00:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ml01.01.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53C8921D49C72; Fri, 4 Aug 2017 15:58:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx1.redhat.com [209.132.183.28]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ml01.01.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3DB6B21E1DAF5 for ; Fri, 4 Aug 2017 15:58:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 096536146B; Fri, 4 Aug 2017 23:00:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lacos-laptop-7.usersys.redhat.com (ovpn-116-20.phx2.redhat.com [10.3.116.20]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16437600C0; Fri, 4 Aug 2017 23:00:47 +0000 (UTC) X-Original-To: edk2-devel@lists.01.org DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mx1.redhat.com 096536146B Authentication-Results: ext-mx10.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: ext-mx10.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com; spf=fail smtp.mailfrom=lersek@redhat.com From: Laszlo Ersek To: edk2-devel-01 Date: Sat, 5 Aug 2017 01:00:43 +0200 Message-Id: <20170804230043.12977-2-lersek@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20170804230043.12977-1-lersek@redhat.com> References: <20170804230043.12977-1-lersek@redhat.com> X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.11 X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.39]); Fri, 04 Aug 2017 23:00:49 +0000 (UTC) Subject: [edk2] [PATCH v2 1/1] OvmfPkg/PlatformPei: support >=1TB high RAM, and discontiguous high RAM X-BeenThere: edk2-devel@lists.01.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: EDK II Development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Jordan Justen MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Errors-To: edk2-devel-bounces@lists.01.org Sender: "edk2-devel" X-ZohoMail: RSF_4 Z_629925259 SPT_0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" In OVMF we currently get the upper (>=3D4GB) memory size with the GetSystemMemorySizeAbove4gb() function. The GetSystemMemorySizeAbove4gb() function is used in two places: (1) It is the starting point of the calculations in GetFirstNonAddress(). GetFirstNonAddress() in turn - determines the placement of the 64-bit PCI MMIO aperture, - provides input for the GCD memory space map's sizing (see AddressWidthInitialization(), and the CPU HOB in MiscInitialization()), - influences the permanent PEI RAM cap (the DXE core's page tables, built in permanent PEI RAM, grow as the RAM to map grows). (2) In QemuInitializeRam(), GetSystemMemorySizeAbove4gb() determines the single memory descriptor HOB that we produce for the upper memory. Respectively, there are two problems with GetSystemMemorySizeAbove4gb(): (1) It reads a 24-bit count of 64KB RAM chunks from the CMOS, and therefore cannot return a larger value than one terabyte. (2) It cannot express discontiguous high RAM. Starting with version 1.7.0, QEMU has provided the fw_cfg file called "etc/e820". Refer to the following QEMU commits: - 0624c7f916b4 ("e820: pass high memory too.", 2013-10-10), - 7d67110f2d9a ("pc: add etc/e820 fw_cfg file", 2013-10-18) - 7db16f2480db ("pc: register e820 entries for ram", 2013-10-10) Ever since these commits in v1.7.0 -- with the last QEMU release being v2.9.0, and v2.10.0 under development --, the only two RAM entries added to this E820 map correspond to the below-4GB RAM range, and the above-4GB RAM range. And, the above-4GB range exactly matches the CMOS registers in question; see the use of "pcms->above_4g_mem_size": pc_q35_init() | pc_init1() pc_memory_init() e820_add_entry(0x100000000ULL, pcms->above_4g_mem_size, E820_RAM); pc_cmos_init() val =3D pcms->above_4g_mem_size / 65536; rtc_set_memory(s, 0x5b, val); rtc_set_memory(s, 0x5c, val >> 8); rtc_set_memory(s, 0x5d, val >> 16); Therefore, remedy the above OVMF limitations as follows: (1) Start off GetFirstNonAddress() by scanning the E820 map for the highest exclusive >=3D4GB RAM address. Fall back to the CMOS if the E820 map is unavailable. Base all further calculations (such as 64-bit PCI MMIO aperture placement, GCD sizing etc) on this value. At the moment, the only difference this change makes is that we can have more than 1TB above 4GB -- given that the sole "high RAM" entry in the E820 map matches the CMOS exactly, modulo the most significant bits (see above). However, Igor plans to add discontiguous (cold-plugged) high RAM to the fw_cfg E820 RAM map later on, and then this scanning will adapt automatically. (2) In QemuInitializeRam(), describe the high RAM regions from the E820 map one by one with memory HOBs. Fall back to the CMOS only if the E820 map is missing. Again, right now this change only makes a difference if there is at least 1TB high RAM. Later on it will adapt to discontiguous high RAM (regardless of its size) automatically. -*- Implementation details: introduce the ScanOrAdd64BitE820Ram() function, which reads the E820 entries from fw_cfg, and finds the highest exclusive >=3D4GB RAM address, or produces memory resource descriptor HOBs for RAM entries that start at or above 4GB. The RAM map is not read in a single go, because its size can vary, and in PlatformPei we should stay away from dynamic memory allocation, for the following reasons: - "Pool" allocations are limited to ~64KB, are served from HOBs, and cannot be released ever. - "Page" allocations are seriously limited before PlatformPei installs the permanent PEI RAM. Furthermore, page allocations can only be released in DXE, with dedicated code (so the address would have to be passed on with a HOB or PCD). - Raw memory allocation HOBs would require the same freeing in DXE. Therefore we process each E820 entry as soon as it is read from fw_cfg. -*- Considering the impact of high RAM on the DXE core: A few years ago, installing high RAM as *tested* would cause the DXE core to inhabit such ranges rather than carving out its home from the permanent PEI RAM. Fortunately, this was fixed in the following edk2 commit: 3a05b13106d1, "MdeModulePkg DxeCore: Take the range in resource HOB for PHIT as higher priority", 2015-09-18 which I regression-tested at the time: http://mid.mail-archive.com/55FC27B0.4070807@redhat.com Later on, OVMF was changed to install its high RAM as tested (effectively "arming" the earlier DXE core change for OVMF), in the following edk2 commit: 035ce3b37c90, "OvmfPkg/PlatformPei: Add memory above 4GB as tested", 2016-04-21 which I also regression-tested at the time: http://mid.mail-archive.com/571E8B90.1020102@redhat.com Therefore adding more "tested memory" HOBs is safe. Cc: Jordan Justen Ref: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3D1468526 Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1 Signed-off-by: Laszlo Ersek Reviewed-by: Jordan Justen --- Notes: v2: =20 - rename E820HighRamIterate() to ScanOrAdd64BitE820Ram() [Jordan] =20 - fold E820HighRamFindHighestExclusiveAddress() and E820HighRamAddMemoryHob() into ScanOrAdd64BitE820Ram(), dependent on the optional "MaxAddress" output parameter [Jordan] OvmfPkg/PlatformPei/MemDetect.c | 129 +++++++++++++++++++- 1 file changed, 127 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/OvmfPkg/PlatformPei/MemDetect.c b/OvmfPkg/PlatformPei/MemDetec= t.c index 97f3fa5afcf5..2b2f3e4bec55 100644 --- a/OvmfPkg/PlatformPei/MemDetect.c +++ b/OvmfPkg/PlatformPei/MemDetect.c @@ -19,6 +19,7 @@ Module Name: // // The package level header files this module uses // +#include #include #include =20 @@ -103,6 +104,109 @@ Q35TsegMbytesInitialization ( } =20 =20 +/** + Iterate over the RAM entries in QEMU's fw_cfg E820 RAM map that start ou= tside + of the 32-bit address range. + + Find the highest exclusive >=3D4GB RAM address, or produce memory resour= ce + descriptor HOBs for RAM entries that start at or above 4GB. + + @param[out] MaxAddress If MaxAddress is NULL, then ScanOrAdd64BitE820Ra= m() + produces memory resource descriptor HOBs for RAM + entries that start at or above 4GB. + + Otherwise, MaxAddress holds the highest exclusive + >=3D4GB RAM address on output. If QEMU's fw_cfg = E820 + RAM map contains no RAM entry that starts outsid= e of + the 32-bit address range, then MaxAddress is exa= ctly + 4GB on output. + + @retval EFI_SUCCESS The fw_cfg E820 RAM map was found and proces= sed. + + @retval EFI_PROTOCOL_ERROR The RAM map was found, but its size wasn't a + whole multiple of sizeof(EFI_E820_ENTRY64). = No + RAM entry was processed. + + @return Error codes from QemuFwCfgFindFile(). No RAM + entry was processed. +**/ +STATIC +EFI_STATUS +ScanOrAdd64BitE820Ram ( + OUT UINT64 *MaxAddress OPTIONAL + ) +{ + EFI_STATUS Status; + FIRMWARE_CONFIG_ITEM FwCfgItem; + UINTN FwCfgSize; + EFI_E820_ENTRY64 E820Entry; + UINTN Processed; + + Status =3D QemuFwCfgFindFile ("etc/e820", &FwCfgItem, &FwCfgSize); + if (EFI_ERROR (Status)) { + return Status; + } + if (FwCfgSize % sizeof E820Entry !=3D 0) { + return EFI_PROTOCOL_ERROR; + } + + if (MaxAddress !=3D NULL) { + *MaxAddress =3D BASE_4GB; + } + + QemuFwCfgSelectItem (FwCfgItem); + for (Processed =3D 0; Processed < FwCfgSize; Processed +=3D sizeof E820E= ntry) { + QemuFwCfgReadBytes (sizeof E820Entry, &E820Entry); + DEBUG (( + DEBUG_VERBOSE, + "%a: Base=3D0x%Lx Length=3D0x%Lx Type=3D%u\n", + __FUNCTION__, + E820Entry.BaseAddr, + E820Entry.Length, + E820Entry.Type + )); + if (E820Entry.Type =3D=3D EfiAcpiAddressRangeMemory && + E820Entry.BaseAddr >=3D BASE_4GB) { + if (MaxAddress =3D=3D NULL) { + UINT64 Base; + UINT64 End; + + // + // Round up the start address, and round down the end address. + // + Base =3D ALIGN_VALUE (E820Entry.BaseAddr, (UINT64)EFI_PAGE_SIZE); + End =3D (E820Entry.BaseAddr + E820Entry.Length) & + ~(UINT64)EFI_PAGE_MASK; + if (Base < End) { + AddMemoryRangeHob (Base, End); + DEBUG (( + DEBUG_VERBOSE, + "%a: AddMemoryRangeHob [0x%Lx, 0x%Lx)\n", + __FUNCTION__, + Base, + End + )); + } + } else { + UINT64 Candidate; + + Candidate =3D E820Entry.BaseAddr + E820Entry.Length; + if (Candidate > *MaxAddress) { + *MaxAddress =3D Candidate; + DEBUG (( + DEBUG_VERBOSE, + "%a: MaxAddress=3D0x%Lx\n", + __FUNCTION__, + *MaxAddress + )); + } + } + } + } + return EFI_SUCCESS; +} + + UINT32 GetSystemMemorySizeBelow4gb ( VOID @@ -170,7 +274,22 @@ GetFirstNonAddress ( UINT64 HotPlugMemoryEnd; RETURN_STATUS PcdStatus; =20 - FirstNonAddress =3D BASE_4GB + GetSystemMemorySizeAbove4gb (); + // + // set FirstNonAddress to suppress incorrect compiler/analyzer warnings + // + FirstNonAddress =3D 0; + + // + // If QEMU presents an E820 map, then get the highest exclusive >=3D4GB = RAM + // address from it. This can express an address >=3D 4GB+1TB. + // + // Otherwise, get the flat size of the memory above 4GB from the CMOS (w= hich + // can only express a size smaller than 1TB), and add it to 4GB. + // + Status =3D ScanOrAdd64BitE820Ram (&FirstNonAddress); + if (EFI_ERROR (Status)) { + FirstNonAddress =3D BASE_4GB + GetSystemMemorySizeAbove4gb (); + } =20 // // If DXE is 32-bit, then we're done; PciBusDxe will degrade 64-bit MMIO @@ -525,7 +644,13 @@ QemuInitializeRam ( AddMemoryRangeHob (BASE_1MB, LowerMemorySize); } =20 - if (UpperMemorySize !=3D 0) { + // + // If QEMU presents an E820 map, then create memory HOBs for the >=3D4= GB RAM + // entries. Otherwise, create a single memory HOB with the flat >=3D4GB + // memory size read from the CMOS. + // + Status =3D ScanOrAdd64BitE820Ram (NULL); + if (EFI_ERROR (Status) && UpperMemorySize !=3D 0) { AddMemoryBaseSizeHob (BASE_4GB, UpperMemorySize); } } --=20 2.13.1.3.g8be5a757fa67 _______________________________________________ edk2-devel mailing list edk2-devel@lists.01.org https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/edk2-devel