Coding style clean-up

[edk2] [PATCH 0/4] Coding style clean-up

Posted by Jian J Wang 7 years, 4 months ago

This patch series are meant for cleaning up code according to coding style
requirements.

Jian J Wang (4):
  MdePkg/BaseLib.h: Coding style clean-up
  MdeModulePkg/Core: Coding style clean-up
  UefiCpuPkg/UefiCpuPkg.uni: Add missing string definition for new PCDs
  UefiCpuPkg: Update code to use new structure field names

 MdeModulePkg/Core/DxeIplPeim/X64/VirtualMemory.c   |  5 ++
 MdePkg/Include/Library/BaseLib.h                   | 72 +++++++++++-----------
 .../Ia32/ArchExceptionHandler.c                    | 24 ++++----
 .../X64/ArchExceptionHandler.c                     |  6 +-
 UefiCpuPkg/Library/MpInitLib/MpLib.c               |  2 +-
 UefiCpuPkg/UefiCpuPkg.uni                          | 16 ++++-
 6 files changed, 71 insertions(+), 54 deletions(-)

-- 
2.15.1.windows.2

_______________________________________________
edk2-devel mailing list
edk2-devel@lists.01.org
https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/edk2-devel

Re: [edk2] [PATCH 0/4] Coding style clean-up

Posted by Kinney, Michael D 7 years, 4 months ago

Jian,

I do not think this change should be made.

One of the exceptions for not following the
EDK II code style is if the field names are
defined in a public specification.  In this case
these fields are all listed in a structure in 
the Intel 64 and IA-32 Architectures Software
Development Manual, Section 7.2.1, Figure 7-2
using upper case register names.

Thanks,

Mike



> -----Original Message-----
> From: edk2-devel [mailto:edk2-devel-bounces@lists.01.org]
> On Behalf Of Jian J Wang
> Sent: Sunday, December 24, 2017 5:07 PM
> To: edk2-devel@lists.01.org
> Subject: [edk2] [PATCH 0/4] Coding style clean-up
> 
> This patch series are meant for cleaning up code
> according to coding style
> requirements.
> 
> Jian J Wang (4):
>   MdePkg/BaseLib.h: Coding style clean-up
>   MdeModulePkg/Core: Coding style clean-up
>   UefiCpuPkg/UefiCpuPkg.uni: Add missing string
> definition for new PCDs
>   UefiCpuPkg: Update code to use new structure field
> names
> 
>  MdeModulePkg/Core/DxeIplPeim/X64/VirtualMemory.c   |  5
> ++
>  MdePkg/Include/Library/BaseLib.h                   | 72
> +++++++++++-----------
>  .../Ia32/ArchExceptionHandler.c                    | 24
> ++++----
>  .../X64/ArchExceptionHandler.c                     |  6
> +-
>  UefiCpuPkg/Library/MpInitLib/MpLib.c               |  2
> +-
>  UefiCpuPkg/UefiCpuPkg.uni                          | 16
> ++++-
>  6 files changed, 71 insertions(+), 54 deletions(-)
> 
> --
> 2.15.1.windows.2
> 
> _______________________________________________
> edk2-devel mailing list
> edk2-devel@lists.01.org
> https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/edk2-devel
_______________________________________________
edk2-devel mailing list
edk2-devel@lists.01.org
https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/edk2-devel

Re: [edk2] [PATCH 0/4] Coding style clean-up

Posted by Wang, Jian J 7 years, 4 months ago

Hi Mike,

Since this patch has been checked in trunk, do you think it should be reverted?
In addition, instead of using exception list for the ECC tool, I think it'd be better
to update ECC tool to use keyword match to check if a field name is public spec
defined one. Otherwise, if there's new structure type using those field names,
the tool will still report errors.

Regards,
Jian

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Kinney, Michael D
> Sent: Wednesday, December 27, 2017 12:48 AM
> To: Wang, Jian J <jian.j.wang@intel.com>; edk2-devel@lists.01.org; Kinney,
> Michael D <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
> Subject: RE: [edk2] [PATCH 0/4] Coding style clean-up
> 
> Jian,
> 
> I do not think this change should be made.
> 
> One of the exceptions for not following the
> EDK II code style is if the field names are
> defined in a public specification.  In this case
> these fields are all listed in a structure in
> the Intel 64 and IA-32 Architectures Software
> Development Manual, Section 7.2.1, Figure 7-2
> using upper case register names.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Mike
> 
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: edk2-devel [mailto:edk2-devel-bounces@lists.01.org]
> > On Behalf Of Jian J Wang
> > Sent: Sunday, December 24, 2017 5:07 PM
> > To: edk2-devel@lists.01.org
> > Subject: [edk2] [PATCH 0/4] Coding style clean-up
> >
> > This patch series are meant for cleaning up code
> > according to coding style
> > requirements.
> >
> > Jian J Wang (4):
> >   MdePkg/BaseLib.h: Coding style clean-up
> >   MdeModulePkg/Core: Coding style clean-up
> >   UefiCpuPkg/UefiCpuPkg.uni: Add missing string
> > definition for new PCDs
> >   UefiCpuPkg: Update code to use new structure field
> > names
> >
> >  MdeModulePkg/Core/DxeIplPeim/X64/VirtualMemory.c   |  5
> > ++
> >  MdePkg/Include/Library/BaseLib.h                   | 72
> > +++++++++++-----------
> >  .../Ia32/ArchExceptionHandler.c                    | 24
> > ++++----
> >  .../X64/ArchExceptionHandler.c                     |  6
> > +-
> >  UefiCpuPkg/Library/MpInitLib/MpLib.c               |  2
> > +-
> >  UefiCpuPkg/UefiCpuPkg.uni                          | 16
> > ++++-
> >  6 files changed, 71 insertions(+), 54 deletions(-)
> >
> > --
> > 2.15.1.windows.2
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > edk2-devel mailing list
> > edk2-devel@lists.01.org
> > https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/edk2-devel
_______________________________________________
edk2-devel mailing list
edk2-devel@lists.01.org
https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/edk2-devel

Re: [edk2] [PATCH 0/4] Coding style clean-up

Posted by Gao, Liming 7 years, 4 months ago

Jian:
  I prefer to roll back this change. So, the definition in BaseLib.h can be kept in the same style. 

Thanks
Liming
>-----Original Message-----
>From: edk2-devel [mailto:edk2-devel-bounces@lists.01.org] On Behalf Of
>Wang, Jian J
>Sent: Wednesday, December 27, 2017 8:40 AM
>To: Kinney, Michael D <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>; edk2-
>devel@lists.01.org
>Subject: Re: [edk2] [PATCH 0/4] Coding style clean-up
>
>Hi Mike,
>
>Since this patch has been checked in trunk, do you think it should be reverted?
>In addition, instead of using exception list for the ECC tool, I think it'd be
>better
>to update ECC tool to use keyword match to check if a field name is public
>spec
>defined one. Otherwise, if there's new structure type using those field names,
>the tool will still report errors.
>
>Regards,
>Jian
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Kinney, Michael D
>> Sent: Wednesday, December 27, 2017 12:48 AM
>> To: Wang, Jian J <jian.j.wang@intel.com>; edk2-devel@lists.01.org; Kinney,
>> Michael D <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
>> Subject: RE: [edk2] [PATCH 0/4] Coding style clean-up
>>
>> Jian,
>>
>> I do not think this change should be made.
>>
>> One of the exceptions for not following the
>> EDK II code style is if the field names are
>> defined in a public specification.  In this case
>> these fields are all listed in a structure in
>> the Intel 64 and IA-32 Architectures Software
>> Development Manual, Section 7.2.1, Figure 7-2
>> using upper case register names.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Mike
>>
>>
>>
>> > -----Original Message-----
>> > From: edk2-devel [mailto:edk2-devel-bounces@lists.01.org]
>> > On Behalf Of Jian J Wang
>> > Sent: Sunday, December 24, 2017 5:07 PM
>> > To: edk2-devel@lists.01.org
>> > Subject: [edk2] [PATCH 0/4] Coding style clean-up
>> >
>> > This patch series are meant for cleaning up code
>> > according to coding style
>> > requirements.
>> >
>> > Jian J Wang (4):
>> >   MdePkg/BaseLib.h: Coding style clean-up
>> >   MdeModulePkg/Core: Coding style clean-up
>> >   UefiCpuPkg/UefiCpuPkg.uni: Add missing string
>> > definition for new PCDs
>> >   UefiCpuPkg: Update code to use new structure field
>> > names
>> >
>> >  MdeModulePkg/Core/DxeIplPeim/X64/VirtualMemory.c   |  5
>> > ++
>> >  MdePkg/Include/Library/BaseLib.h                   | 72
>> > +++++++++++-----------
>> >  .../Ia32/ArchExceptionHandler.c                    | 24
>> > ++++----
>> >  .../X64/ArchExceptionHandler.c                     |  6
>> > +-
>> >  UefiCpuPkg/Library/MpInitLib/MpLib.c               |  2
>> > +-
>> >  UefiCpuPkg/UefiCpuPkg.uni                          | 16
>> > ++++-
>> >  6 files changed, 71 insertions(+), 54 deletions(-)
>> >
>> > --
>> > 2.15.1.windows.2
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > edk2-devel mailing list
>> > edk2-devel@lists.01.org
>> > https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/edk2-devel
>_______________________________________________
>edk2-devel mailing list
>edk2-devel@lists.01.org
>https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/edk2-devel
_______________________________________________
edk2-devel mailing list
edk2-devel@lists.01.org
https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/edk2-devel

Re: [edk2] [PATCH 0/4] Coding style clean-up

Posted by Kinney, Michael D 7 years, 4 months ago

Yes.  Please revert.

I am not sure I understand the ECC tool update you are suggesting.
Can you provide more details?

Mike

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Wang, Jian J
> Sent: Tuesday, December 26, 2017 4:40 PM
> To: Kinney, Michael D <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>; edk2-
> devel@lists.01.org
> Subject: RE: [edk2] [PATCH 0/4] Coding style clean-up
> 
> Hi Mike,
> 
> Since this patch has been checked in trunk, do you think
> it should be reverted?
> In addition, instead of using exception list for the ECC
> tool, I think it'd be better
> to update ECC tool to use keyword match to check if a
> field name is public spec
> defined one. Otherwise, if there's new structure type
> using those field names,
> the tool will still report errors.
> 
> Regards,
> Jian
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Kinney, Michael D
> > Sent: Wednesday, December 27, 2017 12:48 AM
> > To: Wang, Jian J <jian.j.wang@intel.com>; edk2-
> devel@lists.01.org; Kinney,
> > Michael D <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
> > Subject: RE: [edk2] [PATCH 0/4] Coding style clean-up
> >
> > Jian,
> >
> > I do not think this change should be made.
> >
> > One of the exceptions for not following the
> > EDK II code style is if the field names are
> > defined in a public specification.  In this case
> > these fields are all listed in a structure in
> > the Intel 64 and IA-32 Architectures Software
> > Development Manual, Section 7.2.1, Figure 7-2
> > using upper case register names.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Mike
> >
> >
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: edk2-devel [mailto:edk2-devel-
> bounces@lists.01.org]
> > > On Behalf Of Jian J Wang
> > > Sent: Sunday, December 24, 2017 5:07 PM
> > > To: edk2-devel@lists.01.org
> > > Subject: [edk2] [PATCH 0/4] Coding style clean-up
> > >
> > > This patch series are meant for cleaning up code
> > > according to coding style
> > > requirements.
> > >
> > > Jian J Wang (4):
> > >   MdePkg/BaseLib.h: Coding style clean-up
> > >   MdeModulePkg/Core: Coding style clean-up
> > >   UefiCpuPkg/UefiCpuPkg.uni: Add missing string
> > > definition for new PCDs
> > >   UefiCpuPkg: Update code to use new structure field
> > > names
> > >
> > >  MdeModulePkg/Core/DxeIplPeim/X64/VirtualMemory.c   |
> 5
> > > ++
> > >  MdePkg/Include/Library/BaseLib.h                   |
> 72
> > > +++++++++++-----------
> > >  .../Ia32/ArchExceptionHandler.c                    |
> 24
> > > ++++----
> > >  .../X64/ArchExceptionHandler.c                     |
> 6
> > > +-
> > >  UefiCpuPkg/Library/MpInitLib/MpLib.c               |
> 2
> > > +-
> > >  UefiCpuPkg/UefiCpuPkg.uni                          |
> 16
> > > ++++-
> > >  6 files changed, 71 insertions(+), 54 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > --
> > > 2.15.1.windows.2
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > edk2-devel mailing list
> > > edk2-devel@lists.01.org
> > > https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/edk2-devel
_______________________________________________
edk2-devel mailing list
edk2-devel@lists.01.org
https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/edk2-devel

Re: [edk2] [PATCH 0/4] Coding style clean-up

Posted by Wang, Jian J 7 years, 4 months ago

Current ECC use <type-name>.<field-name> in exception list to exclude those special
field name spec defined. Whenever there's a new structure introduced with those field
names, which have been added to exception list, the ECC will still report coding style
violation. Maybe we can just use <field-name> to do field name match for any structure
type to exclude those special names. This can avoid the false reports as many as possible.

Regards,
Jian


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Kinney, Michael D
> Sent: Thursday, December 28, 2017 12:35 AM
> To: Wang, Jian J <jian.j.wang@intel.com>; edk2-devel@lists.01.org; Kinney,
> Michael D <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
> Subject: RE: [edk2] [PATCH 0/4] Coding style clean-up
> 
> Yes.  Please revert.
> 
> I am not sure I understand the ECC tool update you are suggesting.
> Can you provide more details?
> 
> Mike
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Wang, Jian J
> > Sent: Tuesday, December 26, 2017 4:40 PM
> > To: Kinney, Michael D <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>; edk2-
> > devel@lists.01.org
> > Subject: RE: [edk2] [PATCH 0/4] Coding style clean-up
> >
> > Hi Mike,
> >
> > Since this patch has been checked in trunk, do you think
> > it should be reverted?
> > In addition, instead of using exception list for the ECC
> > tool, I think it'd be better
> > to update ECC tool to use keyword match to check if a
> > field name is public spec
> > defined one. Otherwise, if there's new structure type
> > using those field names,
> > the tool will still report errors.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Jian
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Kinney, Michael D
> > > Sent: Wednesday, December 27, 2017 12:48 AM
> > > To: Wang, Jian J <jian.j.wang@intel.com>; edk2-
> > devel@lists.01.org; Kinney,
> > > Michael D <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
> > > Subject: RE: [edk2] [PATCH 0/4] Coding style clean-up
> > >
> > > Jian,
> > >
> > > I do not think this change should be made.
> > >
> > > One of the exceptions for not following the
> > > EDK II code style is if the field names are
> > > defined in a public specification.  In this case
> > > these fields are all listed in a structure in
> > > the Intel 64 and IA-32 Architectures Software
> > > Development Manual, Section 7.2.1, Figure 7-2
> > > using upper case register names.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > >
> > > Mike
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: edk2-devel [mailto:edk2-devel-
> > bounces@lists.01.org]
> > > > On Behalf Of Jian J Wang
> > > > Sent: Sunday, December 24, 2017 5:07 PM
> > > > To: edk2-devel@lists.01.org
> > > > Subject: [edk2] [PATCH 0/4] Coding style clean-up
> > > >
> > > > This patch series are meant for cleaning up code
> > > > according to coding style
> > > > requirements.
> > > >
> > > > Jian J Wang (4):
> > > >   MdePkg/BaseLib.h: Coding style clean-up
> > > >   MdeModulePkg/Core: Coding style clean-up
> > > >   UefiCpuPkg/UefiCpuPkg.uni: Add missing string
> > > > definition for new PCDs
> > > >   UefiCpuPkg: Update code to use new structure field
> > > > names
> > > >
> > > >  MdeModulePkg/Core/DxeIplPeim/X64/VirtualMemory.c   |
> > 5
> > > > ++
> > > >  MdePkg/Include/Library/BaseLib.h                   |
> > 72
> > > > +++++++++++-----------
> > > >  .../Ia32/ArchExceptionHandler.c                    |
> > 24
> > > > ++++----
> > > >  .../X64/ArchExceptionHandler.c                     |
> > 6
> > > > +-
> > > >  UefiCpuPkg/Library/MpInitLib/MpLib.c               |
> > 2
> > > > +-
> > > >  UefiCpuPkg/UefiCpuPkg.uni                          |
> > 16
> > > > ++++-
> > > >  6 files changed, 71 insertions(+), 54 deletions(-)
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > 2.15.1.windows.2
> > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > edk2-devel mailing list
> > > > edk2-devel@lists.01.org
> > > > https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/edk2-devel
_______________________________________________
edk2-devel mailing list
edk2-devel@lists.01.org
https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/edk2-devel

Re: [edk2] [PATCH 0/4] Coding style clean-up

Posted by Kinney, Michael D 7 years, 4 months ago

Jian,

I think <typename>.<fieldname> is the correct way to list
this type of exception.  Otherwise we can miss incorrect
use of that field name.

Mike

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Wang, Jian J
> Sent: Wednesday, December 27, 2017 4:28 PM
> To: Kinney, Michael D <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>;
> edk2-devel@lists.01.org
> Subject: RE: [edk2] [PATCH 0/4] Coding style clean-up
> 
> Current ECC use <type-name>.<field-name> in exception
> list to exclude those special
> field name spec defined. Whenever there's a new
> structure introduced with those field
> names, which have been added to exception list, the ECC
> will still report coding style
> violation. Maybe we can just use <field-name> to do
> field name match for any structure
> type to exclude those special names. This can avoid the
> false reports as many as possible.
> 
> Regards,
> Jian
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Kinney, Michael D
> > Sent: Thursday, December 28, 2017 12:35 AM
> > To: Wang, Jian J <jian.j.wang@intel.com>; edk2-
> devel@lists.01.org; Kinney,
> > Michael D <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
> > Subject: RE: [edk2] [PATCH 0/4] Coding style clean-up
> >
> > Yes.  Please revert.
> >
> > I am not sure I understand the ECC tool update you
> are suggesting.
> > Can you provide more details?
> >
> > Mike
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Wang, Jian J
> > > Sent: Tuesday, December 26, 2017 4:40 PM
> > > To: Kinney, Michael D <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>;
> edk2-
> > > devel@lists.01.org
> > > Subject: RE: [edk2] [PATCH 0/4] Coding style clean-
> up
> > >
> > > Hi Mike,
> > >
> > > Since this patch has been checked in trunk, do you
> think
> > > it should be reverted?
> > > In addition, instead of using exception list for
> the ECC
> > > tool, I think it'd be better
> > > to update ECC tool to use keyword match to check if
> a
> > > field name is public spec
> > > defined one. Otherwise, if there's new structure
> type
> > > using those field names,
> > > the tool will still report errors.
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Jian
> > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Kinney, Michael D
> > > > Sent: Wednesday, December 27, 2017 12:48 AM
> > > > To: Wang, Jian J <jian.j.wang@intel.com>; edk2-
> > > devel@lists.01.org; Kinney,
> > > > Michael D <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
> > > > Subject: RE: [edk2] [PATCH 0/4] Coding style
> clean-up
> > > >
> > > > Jian,
> > > >
> > > > I do not think this change should be made.
> > > >
> > > > One of the exceptions for not following the
> > > > EDK II code style is if the field names are
> > > > defined in a public specification.  In this case
> > > > these fields are all listed in a structure in
> > > > the Intel 64 and IA-32 Architectures Software
> > > > Development Manual, Section 7.2.1, Figure 7-2
> > > > using upper case register names.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > >
> > > > Mike
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > From: edk2-devel [mailto:edk2-devel-
> > > bounces@lists.01.org]
> > > > > On Behalf Of Jian J Wang
> > > > > Sent: Sunday, December 24, 2017 5:07 PM
> > > > > To: edk2-devel@lists.01.org
> > > > > Subject: [edk2] [PATCH 0/4] Coding style clean-
> up
> > > > >
> > > > > This patch series are meant for cleaning up
> code
> > > > > according to coding style
> > > > > requirements.
> > > > >
> > > > > Jian J Wang (4):
> > > > >   MdePkg/BaseLib.h: Coding style clean-up
> > > > >   MdeModulePkg/Core: Coding style clean-up
> > > > >   UefiCpuPkg/UefiCpuPkg.uni: Add missing string
> > > > > definition for new PCDs
> > > > >   UefiCpuPkg: Update code to use new structure
> field
> > > > > names
> > > > >
> > > > >
> MdeModulePkg/Core/DxeIplPeim/X64/VirtualMemory.c   |
> > > 5
> > > > > ++
> > > > >  MdePkg/Include/Library/BaseLib.h
> |
> > > 72
> > > > > +++++++++++-----------
> > > > >  .../Ia32/ArchExceptionHandler.c
> |
> > > 24
> > > > > ++++----
> > > > >  .../X64/ArchExceptionHandler.c
> |
> > > 6
> > > > > +-
> > > > >  UefiCpuPkg/Library/MpInitLib/MpLib.c
> |
> > > 2
> > > > > +-
> > > > >  UefiCpuPkg/UefiCpuPkg.uni
> |
> > > 16
> > > > > ++++-
> > > > >  6 files changed, 71 insertions(+), 54
> deletions(-)
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > 2.15.1.windows.2
> > > > >
> > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > edk2-devel mailing list
> > > > > edk2-devel@lists.01.org
> > > > > https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/edk2-
> devel
_______________________________________________
edk2-devel mailing list
edk2-devel@lists.01.org
https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/edk2-devel

Re: [edk2] [PATCH 0/4] Coding style clean-up

Posted by Wang, Jian J 7 years, 4 months ago

Theoretically, yes. But I think it's a rare case in which someone
will use ESP in a structure but not to represent ESP register.

Regards,
Jian


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Kinney, Michael D
> Sent: Thursday, December 28, 2017 8:37 AM
> To: Wang, Jian J <jian.j.wang@intel.com>; edk2-devel@lists.01.org; Kinney,
> Michael D <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
> Subject: RE: [edk2] [PATCH 0/4] Coding style clean-up
> 
> Jian,
> 
> I think <typename>.<fieldname> is the correct way to list
> this type of exception.  Otherwise we can miss incorrect
> use of that field name.
> 
> Mike
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Wang, Jian J
> > Sent: Wednesday, December 27, 2017 4:28 PM
> > To: Kinney, Michael D <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>;
> > edk2-devel@lists.01.org
> > Subject: RE: [edk2] [PATCH 0/4] Coding style clean-up
> >
> > Current ECC use <type-name>.<field-name> in exception
> > list to exclude those special
> > field name spec defined. Whenever there's a new
> > structure introduced with those field
> > names, which have been added to exception list, the ECC
> > will still report coding style
> > violation. Maybe we can just use <field-name> to do
> > field name match for any structure
> > type to exclude those special names. This can avoid the
> > false reports as many as possible.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Jian
> >
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Kinney, Michael D
> > > Sent: Thursday, December 28, 2017 12:35 AM
> > > To: Wang, Jian J <jian.j.wang@intel.com>; edk2-
> > devel@lists.01.org; Kinney,
> > > Michael D <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
> > > Subject: RE: [edk2] [PATCH 0/4] Coding style clean-up
> > >
> > > Yes.  Please revert.
> > >
> > > I am not sure I understand the ECC tool update you
> > are suggesting.
> > > Can you provide more details?
> > >
> > > Mike
> > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Wang, Jian J
> > > > Sent: Tuesday, December 26, 2017 4:40 PM
> > > > To: Kinney, Michael D <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>;
> > edk2-
> > > > devel@lists.01.org
> > > > Subject: RE: [edk2] [PATCH 0/4] Coding style clean-
> > up
> > > >
> > > > Hi Mike,
> > > >
> > > > Since this patch has been checked in trunk, do you
> > think
> > > > it should be reverted?
> > > > In addition, instead of using exception list for
> > the ECC
> > > > tool, I think it'd be better
> > > > to update ECC tool to use keyword match to check if
> > a
> > > > field name is public spec
> > > > defined one. Otherwise, if there's new structure
> > type
> > > > using those field names,
> > > > the tool will still report errors.
> > > >
> > > > Regards,
> > > > Jian
> > > >
> > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > From: Kinney, Michael D
> > > > > Sent: Wednesday, December 27, 2017 12:48 AM
> > > > > To: Wang, Jian J <jian.j.wang@intel.com>; edk2-
> > > > devel@lists.01.org; Kinney,
> > > > > Michael D <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
> > > > > Subject: RE: [edk2] [PATCH 0/4] Coding style
> > clean-up
> > > > >
> > > > > Jian,
> > > > >
> > > > > I do not think this change should be made.
> > > > >
> > > > > One of the exceptions for not following the
> > > > > EDK II code style is if the field names are
> > > > > defined in a public specification.  In this case
> > > > > these fields are all listed in a structure in
> > > > > the Intel 64 and IA-32 Architectures Software
> > > > > Development Manual, Section 7.2.1, Figure 7-2
> > > > > using upper case register names.
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks,
> > > > >
> > > > > Mike
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > > From: edk2-devel [mailto:edk2-devel-
> > > > bounces@lists.01.org]
> > > > > > On Behalf Of Jian J Wang
> > > > > > Sent: Sunday, December 24, 2017 5:07 PM
> > > > > > To: edk2-devel@lists.01.org
> > > > > > Subject: [edk2] [PATCH 0/4] Coding style clean-
> > up
> > > > > >
> > > > > > This patch series are meant for cleaning up
> > code
> > > > > > according to coding style
> > > > > > requirements.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Jian J Wang (4):
> > > > > >   MdePkg/BaseLib.h: Coding style clean-up
> > > > > >   MdeModulePkg/Core: Coding style clean-up
> > > > > >   UefiCpuPkg/UefiCpuPkg.uni: Add missing string
> > > > > > definition for new PCDs
> > > > > >   UefiCpuPkg: Update code to use new structure
> > field
> > > > > > names
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > MdeModulePkg/Core/DxeIplPeim/X64/VirtualMemory.c   |
> > > > 5
> > > > > > ++
> > > > > >  MdePkg/Include/Library/BaseLib.h
> > |
> > > > 72
> > > > > > +++++++++++-----------
> > > > > >  .../Ia32/ArchExceptionHandler.c
> > |
> > > > 24
> > > > > > ++++----
> > > > > >  .../X64/ArchExceptionHandler.c
> > |
> > > > 6
> > > > > > +-
> > > > > >  UefiCpuPkg/Library/MpInitLib/MpLib.c
> > |
> > > > 2
> > > > > > +-
> > > > > >  UefiCpuPkg/UefiCpuPkg.uni
> > |
> > > > 16
> > > > > > ++++-
> > > > > >  6 files changed, 71 insertions(+), 54
> > deletions(-)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > 2.15.1.windows.2
> > > > > >
> > > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > > edk2-devel mailing list
> > > > > > edk2-devel@lists.01.org
> > > > > > https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/edk2-
> > devel
_______________________________________________
edk2-devel mailing list
edk2-devel@lists.01.org
https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/edk2-devel