From nobody Mon Dec 23 14:53:34 2024 Delivered-To: importer@patchew.org Authentication-Results: mx.zohomail.com; spf=none (zoho.com: 198.145.21.10 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of lists.01.org) smtp.mailfrom=edk2-devel-bounces@lists.01.org; dmarc=fail(p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Return-Path: Received: from ml01.01.org (ml01.01.org [198.145.21.10]) by mx.zohomail.com with SMTPS id 1517582428468973.4309021986004; Fri, 2 Feb 2018 06:40:28 -0800 (PST) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ml01.01.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B832B223AF825; Fri, 2 Feb 2018 06:34:47 -0800 (PST) Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx1.redhat.com [209.132.183.28]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ml01.01.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 88193223AF823 for ; Fri, 2 Feb 2018 06:34:45 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx03.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.13]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6DABF5D5E9; Fri, 2 Feb 2018 14:40:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lacos-laptop-7.usersys.redhat.com (ovpn-121-50.rdu2.redhat.com [10.10.121.50]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFF2560C1A; Fri, 2 Feb 2018 14:40:21 +0000 (UTC) X-Original-To: edk2-devel@lists.01.org Received-SPF: none (zoho.com: 198.145.21.10 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of lists.01.org) client-ip=198.145.21.10; envelope-from=edk2-devel-bounces@lists.01.org; helo=ml01.01.org; Received-SPF: Pass (sender SPF authorized) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=209.132.183.28; helo=mx1.redhat.com; envelope-from=lersek@redhat.com; receiver=edk2-devel@lists.01.org From: Laszlo Ersek To: edk2-devel-01 Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2018 15:39:48 +0100 Message-Id: <20180202143954.7357-9-lersek@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20180202143954.7357-1-lersek@redhat.com> References: <20180202143954.7357-1-lersek@redhat.com> X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.13 X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.39]); Fri, 02 Feb 2018 14:40:23 +0000 (UTC) Subject: [edk2] [PATCH 08/14] UefiCpuPkg/PiSmmCpuDxeSmm: remove unneeded DBs from X64 SmmStartup() X-BeenThere: edk2-devel@lists.01.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: EDK II Development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Michael D Kinney , Ruiyu Ni , Jiewen Yao , Eric Dong , Liming Gao MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Errors-To: edk2-devel-bounces@lists.01.org Sender: "edk2-devel" X-ZohoMail: RSF_4 Z_629925259 SPT_0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" (This patch is the 64-bit variant of commit e75ee97224e5, "UefiCpuPkg/PiSmmCpuDxeSmm: remove unneeded DBs from IA32 SmmStartup()", 2018-01-31.) The SmmStartup() function executes in SMM, which is very similar to real mode. Add "BITS 16" before it and "BITS 64" after it (just before the @LongMode label). Remove the manual 0x66 operand-size override prefixes, for selecting 32-bit operands -- the sizes of our operands trigger NASM to insert the prefixes automatically in almost every spot. The one place where we have to add it back manually is the LGDT instruction. In the LGDT instruction we also replace the binary 0x2E prefix with the normal NASM syntax for CS segment override. The stores to the Control Registers were always 32-bit wide; the source code only used RAX as source operand because it generated the expected object code (with NASM compiling the source as if in BITS 64). With BITS 16 added, we can use the actual register width in the source operands (EAX). This patch causes NASM to generate byte-identical object code (determined by disassembling both the pre-patch and post-patch versions, and comparing the listings), except: > @@ -231,7 +231,7 @@ > 000001D2 6689D3 mov ebx,edx > 000001D5 66B800000000 mov eax,0x0 > 000001DB 0F22D8 mov cr3,eax > -000001DE 662E670F0155F6 o32 lgdt [cs:ebp-0xa] > +000001DE 2E66670F0155F6 o32 lgdt [cs:ebp-0xa] > 000001E5 66B800000000 mov eax,0x0 > 000001EB 80CC02 or ah,0x2 > 000001EE 0F22E0 mov cr4,eax The only difference is the prefix list order, it changes from: - 0x66, 0x2E, 0x67 to - 0x2E, 0x66, 0x67 Cc: Eric Dong Cc: Jiewen Yao Cc: Liming Gao Cc: Michael D Kinney Cc: Ruiyu Ni Ref: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D866 Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1 Signed-off-by: Laszlo Ersek --- UefiCpuPkg/PiSmmCpuDxeSmm/X64/SmmInit.nasm | 17 ++++++++--------- 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) diff --git a/UefiCpuPkg/PiSmmCpuDxeSmm/X64/SmmInit.nasm b/UefiCpuPkg/PiSmmC= puDxeSmm/X64/SmmInit.nasm index b147e7218019..2eaf1433dcd6 100644 --- a/UefiCpuPkg/PiSmmCpuDxeSmm/X64/SmmInit.nasm +++ b/UefiCpuPkg/PiSmmCpuDxeSmm/X64/SmmInit.nasm @@ -41,26 +41,23 @@ ASM_PFX(gcSmiInitGdtr): DQ 0 =20 global ASM_PFX(SmmStartup) + +BITS 16 ASM_PFX(SmmStartup): - DB 0x66 mov eax, 0x80000001 ; read capability cpuid - DB 0x66 mov ebx, edx ; rdmsr will change edx. keep it i= n ebx. DB 0x66, 0xb8 ; mov eax, imm32 ASM_PFX(gSmmCr3): DD 0 - mov cr3, rax - DB 0x66, 0x2e - lgdt [ebp + (ASM_PFX(gcSmiInitGdtr) - ASM_PFX(SmmStartup))] + mov cr3, eax +o32 lgdt [cs:ebp + (ASM_PFX(gcSmiInitGdtr) - ASM_PFX(SmmStartup))] DB 0x66, 0xb8 ; mov eax, imm32 ASM_PFX(gSmmCr4): DD 0 or ah, 2 ; enable XMM registers access - mov cr4, rax - DB 0x66 + mov cr4, eax mov ecx, 0xc0000080 ; IA32_EFER MSR rdmsr or ah, BIT0 ; set LME bit - DB 0x66 test ebx, BIT20 ; check NXE capability jz .1 or ah, BIT3 ; set NXE bit @@ -68,9 +65,11 @@ ASM_PFX(gSmmCr4): DD 0 wrmsr DB 0x66, 0xb8 ; mov eax, imm32 ASM_PFX(gSmmCr0): DD 0 - mov cr0, rax ; enable protected mode & paging + mov cr0, eax ; enable protected mode & paging DB 0x66, 0xea ; far jmp to long mode ASM_PFX(gSmmJmpAddr): DQ 0;@LongMode + +BITS 64 @LongMode: ; long-mode starts here DB 0x48, 0xbc ; mov rsp, imm64 ASM_PFX(gSmmInitStack): DQ 0 --=20 2.14.1.3.gb7cf6e02401b _______________________________________________ edk2-devel mailing list edk2-devel@lists.01.org https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/edk2-devel