Hi, Laszlo Ersek;
I have tested the uefi booting KVM vm with the configuration(xml); but start hang.
Enable the memoryhotplug, with usb3.0 config. The config as Config1 below.
Tested branches:
UDK2017 eea98eea4ccbb1d640657770bccb5497fddc6064
Master 76fd5a660d704538a1b14a58d03a4eef9682b01c
Both hang on the snapshot TianoCore in VNC
Try to shoot the problem;
I find the early version can boot success with the same config.
Maybe the patch1 below cause the problem;
Try to ignore the patch does, the master/ UDK2017 both can boot success.
But I don't know why. Hope for your help,thanks.
Patch1
***********************************************
commit 4f5eff8193096eb847639f090a7dfae3cff95fde
Author: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Date: Fri Mar 4 20:06:26 2016 +0100
OvmfPkg: PciHostBridgeLib: install 64-bit PCI host aperture
diff --git a/OvmfPkg/Library/PciHostBridgeLib/PciHostBridgeLib.c b/OvmfPkg/Library/PciHostBridgeLib/PciHostBridgeLib
index 3e02778..1d3d10a 100644
--- a/OvmfPkg/Library/PciHostBridgeLib/PciHostBridgeLib.c
+++ b/OvmfPkg/Library/PciHostBridgeLib/PciHostBridgeLib.c
@@ -132,6 +132,13 @@ InitRootBridge (
RootBus->MemAbove4G.Base = 0;
RootBus->MemAbove4G.Limit = 0;
+ if (PcdGet64 (PcdPciMmio64Size) > 0) {
+ RootBus->AllocationAttributes |= EFI_PCI_HOST_BRIDGE_MEM64_DECODE;
+ RootBus->MemAbove4G.Base = PcdGet64 (PcdPciMmio64Base);
+ RootBus->MemAbove4G.Limit = PcdGet64 (PcdPciMmio64Base) +
+ (PcdGet64 (PcdPciMmio64Size) - 1);
+ }
+
RootBus->Bus.Base = RootBusNumber;
RootBus->Bus.Limit = MaxSubBusNumber;
RootBus->Io.Base = PcdGet64 (PcdPciIoBase);
diff --git a/OvmfPkg/Library/PciHostBridgeLib/PciHostBridgeLib.inf b/OvmfPkg/Library/PciHostBridgeLib/PciHostBridgeL
index bbec746..7a964c7 100644
--- a/OvmfPkg/Library/PciHostBridgeLib/PciHostBridgeLib.inf
+++ b/OvmfPkg/Library/PciHostBridgeLib/PciHostBridgeLib.inf
@@ -51,4 +51,6 @@
gUefiOvmfPkgTokenSpaceGuid.PcdPciIoSize
gUefiOvmfPkgTokenSpaceGuid.PcdPciMmio32Base
gUefiOvmfPkgTokenSpaceGuid.PcdPciMmio32Size
+ gUefiOvmfPkgTokenSpaceGuid.PcdPciMmio64Base
+ gUefiOvmfPkgTokenSpaceGuid.PcdPciMmio64Size
gUefiOvmfPkgTokenSpaceGuid.PcdOvmfHostBridgePciDevId
***********************************************
Config1
***********************************************
<maxMemory slots='256' unit='KiB'>4294967296</maxMemory>
<memory unit='KiB'>4294967</memory>
<currentMemory unit='KiB'>4294967</currentMemory>
Xxxx
<controller type='usb' index='2' model='nec-xhci'>
<address type='pci' domain='0x0000' bus='0x00' slot='0x1c' function='0x0'/>
</controller>
***********************************************
_______________________________________________
edk2-devel mailing list
edk2-devel@lists.01.org
https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/edk2-devel
Hi, sorry about the delayed response. CC'ing Igor, and commenting below: On 10/31/17 15:29, Hangaohuai wrote: > Hi, Laszlo Ersek; > > I have tested the uefi booting KVM vm with the configuration(xml); but > start hang. > Enable the memoryhotplug, with usb3.0 config. The config as Config1 > below. > > Tested branches: > UDK2017 eea98eea4ccbb1d640657770bccb5497fddc6064 > Master 76fd5a660d704538a1b14a58d03a4eef9682b01c > > Both hang on the snapshot TianoCore in VNC > > Try to shoot the problem; > I find the early version can boot success with the same config. > Maybe the patch1 below cause the problem; > > Try to ignore the patch does, the master/ UDK2017 both can boot > success. > But I don't know why. Hope for your help,thanks. > > Patch1 > *********************************************** > commit 4f5eff8193096eb847639f090a7dfae3cff95fde > Author: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com> > Date: Fri Mar 4 20:06:26 2016 +0100 > > OvmfPkg: PciHostBridgeLib: install 64-bit PCI host aperture > > diff --git a/OvmfPkg/Library/PciHostBridgeLib/PciHostBridgeLib.c b/OvmfPkg/Library/PciHostBridgeLib/PciHostBridgeLib > index 3e02778..1d3d10a 100644 > --- a/OvmfPkg/Library/PciHostBridgeLib/PciHostBridgeLib.c > +++ b/OvmfPkg/Library/PciHostBridgeLib/PciHostBridgeLib.c > @@ -132,6 +132,13 @@ InitRootBridge ( > RootBus->MemAbove4G.Base = 0; > RootBus->MemAbove4G.Limit = 0; > + if (PcdGet64 (PcdPciMmio64Size) > 0) { > + RootBus->AllocationAttributes |= EFI_PCI_HOST_BRIDGE_MEM64_DECODE; > + RootBus->MemAbove4G.Base = PcdGet64 (PcdPciMmio64Base); > + RootBus->MemAbove4G.Limit = PcdGet64 (PcdPciMmio64Base) + > + (PcdGet64 (PcdPciMmio64Size) - 1); > + } > + > RootBus->Bus.Base = RootBusNumber; > RootBus->Bus.Limit = MaxSubBusNumber; > RootBus->Io.Base = PcdGet64 (PcdPciIoBase); > diff --git a/OvmfPkg/Library/PciHostBridgeLib/PciHostBridgeLib.inf b/OvmfPkg/Library/PciHostBridgeLib/PciHostBridgeL > index bbec746..7a964c7 100644 > --- a/OvmfPkg/Library/PciHostBridgeLib/PciHostBridgeLib.inf > +++ b/OvmfPkg/Library/PciHostBridgeLib/PciHostBridgeLib.inf > @@ -51,4 +51,6 @@ > gUefiOvmfPkgTokenSpaceGuid.PcdPciIoSize > gUefiOvmfPkgTokenSpaceGuid.PcdPciMmio32Base > gUefiOvmfPkgTokenSpaceGuid.PcdPciMmio32Size > + gUefiOvmfPkgTokenSpaceGuid.PcdPciMmio64Base > + gUefiOvmfPkgTokenSpaceGuid.PcdPciMmio64Size > gUefiOvmfPkgTokenSpaceGuid.PcdOvmfHostBridgePciDevId > *********************************************** > > > Config1 > *********************************************** > <maxMemory slots='256' unit='KiB'>4294967296</maxMemory> > <memory unit='KiB'>4294967</memory> > <currentMemory unit='KiB'>4294967</currentMemory> > Xxxx > <controller type='usb' index='2' model='nec-xhci'> > <address type='pci' domain='0x0000' bus='0x00' slot='0x1c' function='0x0'/> > </controller> > *********************************************** The patch that you identified is responsible for exposing the 64-bit MMIO aperture for PCI MMIO BAR allocation purposes. Reverting this patch might mask the issue, but I don't expect the actual problem to be in this patch. Instead, the base address and the size of the aperture in question is determined in the file OvmfPkg/PlatformPei/MemDetect.c in the function GetFirstNonAddress() This function takes the memory (DIMM) hotplug range in question, the end of which is presented by QEMU in the fw_cfg file etc/reserved-memory-end To my knowledge, this fw_cfg file is an 8-byte integer in LE encoding. Quoting the code: > // > // If QEMU presents an E820 map, then get the highest exclusive >=4GB RAM > // address from it. This can express an address >= 4GB+1TB. > // > // Otherwise, get the flat size of the memory above 4GB from the CMOS (which > // can only express a size smaller than 1TB), and add it to 4GB. > // > Status = ScanOrAdd64BitE820Ram (&FirstNonAddress); > if (EFI_ERROR (Status)) { > FirstNonAddress = BASE_4GB + GetSystemMemorySizeAbove4gb (); > } > > ... > > // > // The "etc/reserved-memory-end" fw_cfg file, when present, contains an > // absolute, exclusive end address for the memory hotplug area. This area > // starts right at the end of the memory above 4GB. The 64-bit PCI host > // aperture must be placed above it. > // > Status = QemuFwCfgFindFile ("etc/reserved-memory-end", &FwCfgItem, > &FwCfgSize); > if (!EFI_ERROR (Status) && FwCfgSize == sizeof HotPlugMemoryEnd) { > QemuFwCfgSelectItem (FwCfgItem); > QemuFwCfgReadBytes (FwCfgSize, &HotPlugMemoryEnd); > > ASSERT (HotPlugMemoryEnd >= FirstNonAddress); > FirstNonAddress = HotPlugMemoryEnd; > } Can you check if the ASSERT fires for you? For that, please capture the OVMF debug log like this: (1) build OVMF with the following flag: --pcd=gEfiMdePkgTokenSpaceGuid.PcdDebugPrintErrorLevel=0x8040004F (2) modify your domain XML as follows: <domain type='kvm' xmlns:qemu='http://libvirt.org/schemas/domain/qemu/1.0'> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ <--- don't forget this attribute! <qemu:commandline> <qemu:arg value='-global'/> <qemu:arg value='isa-debugcon.iobase=0x402'/> <qemu:arg value='-debugcon'/> <qemu:arg value='file:/tmp/ovmf.log'/> </qemu:commandline> </domain> Then the file "/tmp/ovmf.log" should contain a verbose OVMF log -- please attach it. Thanks Laszlo _______________________________________________ edk2-devel mailing list edk2-devel@lists.01.org https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/edk2-devel
Hi, Laszlo Ersek; Thanks for your reply. I have trying to shoot this trouble: 1. edk get the MtrrValidBitsMask by "AsmCpuid (CPUID_VIR_PHY_ADDRESS_SIZE, &VirPhyAddressSize.Uint32, NULL, NULL, NULL); "(0x80000008) 2. Cpuid(0x80000008) is held in kvm struct (&vcpu->arch.cpuid_entries[i]) 3. (0x80000008) is set by qemu; Part1: We set the <maxMemory slots='256' unit='KiB'>4294967296</maxMemory>, the "GetFirstNonAddress: Pci64Base=0x44800000000" But the MtrrValidBitsMask get 0x3FF FFFF FFFF; Does not pass the check. MtrrLibInitializeMtrrMask (&MtrrValidBitsMask, &MtrrValidAddressMask); if (((BaseAddress & ~MtrrValidAddressMask) != 0) || (Length & ~MtrrValidAddressMask) != 0) { return RETURN_UNSUPPORTED; } Part2: Xhci_hcd will use the address above maxMemory, so we visit the wrong address. Checking by starting a <maxMemory slots='256' unit='KiB'>3294967296</maxMemory> memory with USB3.0. So , I think edk2 is ok; maxMemory depend on CPU support more the 42bit. *********************** Hi, sorry about the delayed response. CC'ing Igor, and commenting below: On 10/31/17 15:29, Hangaohuai wrote: > Hi, Laszlo Ersek; > > I have tested the uefi booting KVM vm with the configuration(xml); but > start hang. > Enable the memoryhotplug, with usb3.0 config. The config as Config1 > below. > > Tested branches: > UDK2017 eea98eea4ccbb1d640657770bccb5497fddc6064 > Master 76fd5a660d704538a1b14a58d03a4eef9682b01c > > Both hang on the snapshot TianoCore in VNC > > Try to shoot the problem; > I find the early version can boot success with the same config. > Maybe the patch1 below cause the problem; > > Try to ignore the patch does, the master/ UDK2017 both can boot > success. > But I don't know why. Hope for your help,thanks. > > Patch1 > *********************************************** > commit 4f5eff8193096eb847639f090a7dfae3cff95fde > Author: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com> > Date: Fri Mar 4 20:06:26 2016 +0100 > > OvmfPkg: PciHostBridgeLib: install 64-bit PCI host aperture > > diff --git a/OvmfPkg/Library/PciHostBridgeLib/PciHostBridgeLib.c > b/OvmfPkg/Library/PciHostBridgeLib/PciHostBridgeLib > index 3e02778..1d3d10a 100644 > --- a/OvmfPkg/Library/PciHostBridgeLib/PciHostBridgeLib.c > +++ b/OvmfPkg/Library/PciHostBridgeLib/PciHostBridgeLib.c > @@ -132,6 +132,13 @@ InitRootBridge ( > RootBus->MemAbove4G.Base = 0; > RootBus->MemAbove4G.Limit = 0; > + if (PcdGet64 (PcdPciMmio64Size) > 0) { > + RootBus->AllocationAttributes |= EFI_PCI_HOST_BRIDGE_MEM64_DECODE; > + RootBus->MemAbove4G.Base = PcdGet64 (PcdPciMmio64Base); > + RootBus->MemAbove4G.Limit = PcdGet64 (PcdPciMmio64Base) + > + (PcdGet64 (PcdPciMmio64Size) - > + 1); } > + > RootBus->Bus.Base = RootBusNumber; > RootBus->Bus.Limit = MaxSubBusNumber; > RootBus->Io.Base = PcdGet64 (PcdPciIoBase); > diff --git a/OvmfPkg/Library/PciHostBridgeLib/PciHostBridgeLib.inf > b/OvmfPkg/Library/PciHostBridgeLib/PciHostBridgeL > index bbec746..7a964c7 100644 > --- a/OvmfPkg/Library/PciHostBridgeLib/PciHostBridgeLib.inf > +++ b/OvmfPkg/Library/PciHostBridgeLib/PciHostBridgeLib.inf > @@ -51,4 +51,6 @@ > gUefiOvmfPkgTokenSpaceGuid.PcdPciIoSize > gUefiOvmfPkgTokenSpaceGuid.PcdPciMmio32Base > gUefiOvmfPkgTokenSpaceGuid.PcdPciMmio32Size > + gUefiOvmfPkgTokenSpaceGuid.PcdPciMmio64Base > + gUefiOvmfPkgTokenSpaceGuid.PcdPciMmio64Size > gUefiOvmfPkgTokenSpaceGuid.PcdOvmfHostBridgePciDevId > *********************************************** > > > Config1 > *********************************************** > <maxMemory slots='256' unit='KiB'>4294967296</maxMemory> > <memory unit='KiB'>4294967</memory> > <currentMemory unit='KiB'>4294967</currentMemory> > Xxxx > <controller type='usb' index='2' model='nec-xhci'> > <address type='pci' domain='0x0000' bus='0x00' slot='0x1c' > function='0x0'/> </controller> > *********************************************** The patch that you identified is responsible for exposing the 64-bit MMIO aperture for PCI MMIO BAR allocation purposes. Reverting this patch might mask the issue, but I don't expect the actual problem to be in this patch. Instead, the base address and the size of the aperture in question is determined in the file OvmfPkg/PlatformPei/MemDetect.c in the function GetFirstNonAddress() This function takes the memory (DIMM) hotplug range in question, the end of which is presented by QEMU in the fw_cfg file etc/reserved-memory-end To my knowledge, this fw_cfg file is an 8-byte integer in LE encoding. Quoting the code: > // > // If QEMU presents an E820 map, then get the highest exclusive >=4GB RAM > // address from it. This can express an address >= 4GB+1TB. > // > // Otherwise, get the flat size of the memory above 4GB from the CMOS (which > // can only express a size smaller than 1TB), and add it to 4GB. > // > Status = ScanOrAdd64BitE820Ram (&FirstNonAddress); > if (EFI_ERROR (Status)) { > FirstNonAddress = BASE_4GB + GetSystemMemorySizeAbove4gb (); > } > > ... > > // > // The "etc/reserved-memory-end" fw_cfg file, when present, contains an > // absolute, exclusive end address for the memory hotplug area. This area > // starts right at the end of the memory above 4GB. The 64-bit PCI host > // aperture must be placed above it. > // > Status = QemuFwCfgFindFile ("etc/reserved-memory-end", &FwCfgItem, > &FwCfgSize); > if (!EFI_ERROR (Status) && FwCfgSize == sizeof HotPlugMemoryEnd) { > QemuFwCfgSelectItem (FwCfgItem); > QemuFwCfgReadBytes (FwCfgSize, &HotPlugMemoryEnd); > > ASSERT (HotPlugMemoryEnd >= FirstNonAddress); > FirstNonAddress = HotPlugMemoryEnd; > } Can you check if the ASSERT fires for you? For that, please capture the OVMF debug log like this: (1) build OVMF with the following flag: --pcd=gEfiMdePkgTokenSpaceGuid.PcdDebugPrintErrorLevel=0x8040004F (2) modify your domain XML as follows: <domain type='kvm' xmlns:qemu='http://libvirt.org/schemas/domain/qemu/1.0'> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ <--- don't forget this attribute! <qemu:commandline> <qemu:arg value='-global'/> <qemu:arg value='isa-debugcon.iobase=0x402'/> <qemu:arg value='-debugcon'/> <qemu:arg value='file:/tmp/ovmf.log'/> </qemu:commandline> </domain> Then the file "/tmp/ovmf.log" should contain a verbose OVMF log -- please attach it. Thanks Laszlo _______________________________________________ edk2-devel mailing list edk2-devel@lists.01.org https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/edk2-devel
On 11/07/17 03:39, Hangaohuai wrote: > Hi, Laszlo Ersek; > Thanks for your reply. > > I have trying to shoot this trouble: > > 1. edk get the MtrrValidBitsMask by "AsmCpuid (CPUID_VIR_PHY_ADDRESS_SIZE, &VirPhyAddressSize.Uint32, NULL, NULL, NULL); "(0x80000008) > 2. Cpuid(0x80000008) is held in kvm struct (&vcpu->arch.cpuid_entries[i]) > 3. (0x80000008) is set by qemu; > > Part1: > We set the <maxMemory slots='256' unit='KiB'>4294967296</maxMemory>, the "GetFirstNonAddress: Pci64Base=0x44800000000" > But the MtrrValidBitsMask get 0x3FF FFFF FFFF; > Does not pass the check. > MtrrLibInitializeMtrrMask (&MtrrValidBitsMask, &MtrrValidAddressMask); > if (((BaseAddress & ~MtrrValidAddressMask) != 0) || (Length & ~MtrrValidAddressMask) != 0) { > return RETURN_UNSUPPORTED; > } > > Part2: > Xhci_hcd will use the address above maxMemory, so we visit the wrong address. > Checking by starting a <maxMemory slots='256' unit='KiB'>3294967296</maxMemory> memory with USB3.0. > > So , I think edk2 is ok; maxMemory depend on CPU support more the 42bit. That's right; if you look at /proc/cpuinfo on your KVM host, it will say something like: address sizes : 39 bits physical, 48 bits virtual ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ (the actual number will vary). With EPT enabled (see "/sys/module/kvm_intel/parameters/ept"), the guest cannot have a larger guest-phys address space than what's supported by the host CPU's physical address width. Thanks, Laszlo > > > *********************** > Hi, > > sorry about the delayed response. > > CC'ing Igor, and commenting below: > > On 10/31/17 15:29, Hangaohuai wrote: >> Hi, Laszlo Ersek; >> >> I have tested the uefi booting KVM vm with the configuration(xml); but >> start hang. >> Enable the memoryhotplug, with usb3.0 config. The config as Config1 >> below. >> >> Tested branches: >> UDK2017 eea98eea4ccbb1d640657770bccb5497fddc6064 >> Master 76fd5a660d704538a1b14a58d03a4eef9682b01c >> >> Both hang on the snapshot TianoCore in VNC >> >> Try to shoot the problem; >> I find the early version can boot success with the same config. >> Maybe the patch1 below cause the problem; >> >> Try to ignore the patch does, the master/ UDK2017 both can boot >> success. >> But I don't know why. Hope for your help,thanks. >> >> Patch1 >> *********************************************** >> commit 4f5eff8193096eb847639f090a7dfae3cff95fde >> Author: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com> >> Date: Fri Mar 4 20:06:26 2016 +0100 >> >> OvmfPkg: PciHostBridgeLib: install 64-bit PCI host aperture >> >> diff --git a/OvmfPkg/Library/PciHostBridgeLib/PciHostBridgeLib.c >> b/OvmfPkg/Library/PciHostBridgeLib/PciHostBridgeLib >> index 3e02778..1d3d10a 100644 >> --- a/OvmfPkg/Library/PciHostBridgeLib/PciHostBridgeLib.c >> +++ b/OvmfPkg/Library/PciHostBridgeLib/PciHostBridgeLib.c >> @@ -132,6 +132,13 @@ InitRootBridge ( >> RootBus->MemAbove4G.Base = 0; >> RootBus->MemAbove4G.Limit = 0; >> + if (PcdGet64 (PcdPciMmio64Size) > 0) { >> + RootBus->AllocationAttributes |= EFI_PCI_HOST_BRIDGE_MEM64_DECODE; >> + RootBus->MemAbove4G.Base = PcdGet64 (PcdPciMmio64Base); >> + RootBus->MemAbove4G.Limit = PcdGet64 (PcdPciMmio64Base) + >> + (PcdGet64 (PcdPciMmio64Size) - >> + 1); } >> + >> RootBus->Bus.Base = RootBusNumber; >> RootBus->Bus.Limit = MaxSubBusNumber; >> RootBus->Io.Base = PcdGet64 (PcdPciIoBase); >> diff --git a/OvmfPkg/Library/PciHostBridgeLib/PciHostBridgeLib.inf >> b/OvmfPkg/Library/PciHostBridgeLib/PciHostBridgeL >> index bbec746..7a964c7 100644 >> --- a/OvmfPkg/Library/PciHostBridgeLib/PciHostBridgeLib.inf >> +++ b/OvmfPkg/Library/PciHostBridgeLib/PciHostBridgeLib.inf >> @@ -51,4 +51,6 @@ >> gUefiOvmfPkgTokenSpaceGuid.PcdPciIoSize >> gUefiOvmfPkgTokenSpaceGuid.PcdPciMmio32Base >> gUefiOvmfPkgTokenSpaceGuid.PcdPciMmio32Size >> + gUefiOvmfPkgTokenSpaceGuid.PcdPciMmio64Base >> + gUefiOvmfPkgTokenSpaceGuid.PcdPciMmio64Size >> gUefiOvmfPkgTokenSpaceGuid.PcdOvmfHostBridgePciDevId >> *********************************************** >> >> >> Config1 >> *********************************************** >> <maxMemory slots='256' unit='KiB'>4294967296</maxMemory> >> <memory unit='KiB'>4294967</memory> >> <currentMemory unit='KiB'>4294967</currentMemory> >> Xxxx >> <controller type='usb' index='2' model='nec-xhci'> >> <address type='pci' domain='0x0000' bus='0x00' slot='0x1c' >> function='0x0'/> </controller> >> *********************************************** > > The patch that you identified is responsible for exposing the 64-bit MMIO aperture for PCI MMIO BAR allocation purposes. > > Reverting this patch might mask the issue, but I don't expect the actual problem to be in this patch. > > Instead, the base address and the size of the aperture in question is determined in the file > > OvmfPkg/PlatformPei/MemDetect.c > > in the function > > GetFirstNonAddress() > > This function takes the memory (DIMM) hotplug range in question, the end of which is presented by QEMU in the fw_cfg file > > etc/reserved-memory-end > > To my knowledge, this fw_cfg file is an 8-byte integer in LE encoding. > > Quoting the code: > >> // >> // If QEMU presents an E820 map, then get the highest exclusive >=4GB RAM >> // address from it. This can express an address >= 4GB+1TB. >> // >> // Otherwise, get the flat size of the memory above 4GB from the CMOS (which >> // can only express a size smaller than 1TB), and add it to 4GB. >> // >> Status = ScanOrAdd64BitE820Ram (&FirstNonAddress); >> if (EFI_ERROR (Status)) { >> FirstNonAddress = BASE_4GB + GetSystemMemorySizeAbove4gb (); >> } >> >> ... >> >> // >> // The "etc/reserved-memory-end" fw_cfg file, when present, contains an >> // absolute, exclusive end address for the memory hotplug area. This area >> // starts right at the end of the memory above 4GB. The 64-bit PCI host >> // aperture must be placed above it. >> // >> Status = QemuFwCfgFindFile ("etc/reserved-memory-end", &FwCfgItem, >> &FwCfgSize); >> if (!EFI_ERROR (Status) && FwCfgSize == sizeof HotPlugMemoryEnd) { >> QemuFwCfgSelectItem (FwCfgItem); >> QemuFwCfgReadBytes (FwCfgSize, &HotPlugMemoryEnd); >> >> ASSERT (HotPlugMemoryEnd >= FirstNonAddress); >> FirstNonAddress = HotPlugMemoryEnd; >> } > > Can you check if the ASSERT fires for you? > > For that, please capture the OVMF debug log like this: > > (1) build OVMF with the following flag: > > --pcd=gEfiMdePkgTokenSpaceGuid.PcdDebugPrintErrorLevel=0x8040004F > > (2) modify your domain XML as follows: > > <domain type='kvm' xmlns:qemu='http://libvirt.org/schemas/domain/qemu/1.0'> > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ <--- don't forget this attribute! > <qemu:commandline> > <qemu:arg value='-global'/> > <qemu:arg value='isa-debugcon.iobase=0x402'/> > <qemu:arg value='-debugcon'/> > <qemu:arg value='file:/tmp/ovmf.log'/> > </qemu:commandline> > </domain> > > Then the file "/tmp/ovmf.log" should contain a verbose OVMF log -- please attach it. > > Thanks > Laszlo > _______________________________________________ edk2-devel mailing list edk2-devel@lists.01.org https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/edk2-devel
© 2016 - 2024 Red Hat, Inc.