Range check in virPortAllocatorSetUsed is not useful anymore
when we manage ports for entire unsigned short range values.
---
src/bhyve/bhyve_command.c | 4 +---
src/bhyve/bhyve_process.c | 4 +---
src/qemu/qemu_process.c | 41 +++++++++++------------------------------
src/util/virportallocator.c | 9 +--------
src/util/virportallocator.h | 4 +---
5 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 47 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/bhyve/bhyve_command.c b/src/bhyve/bhyve_command.c
index 55032ae..9d21788 100644
--- a/src/bhyve/bhyve_command.c
+++ b/src/bhyve/bhyve_command.c
@@ -411,9 +411,7 @@ bhyveBuildGraphicsArgStr(const virDomainDef *def,
return -1;
graphics->data.vnc.port = port;
} else {
- if (virPortAllocatorSetUsed(driver->remotePorts,
- graphics->data.vnc.port,
- true) < 0)
+ if (virPortAllocatorSetUsed(graphics->data.vnc.port, true) < 0)
VIR_WARN("Failed to mark VNC port '%d' as used by '%s'",
graphics->data.vnc.port, def->name);
}
diff --git a/src/bhyve/bhyve_process.c b/src/bhyve/bhyve_process.c
index 5076246..e215f6a 100644
--- a/src/bhyve/bhyve_process.c
+++ b/src/bhyve/bhyve_process.c
@@ -425,9 +425,7 @@ virBhyveProcessReconnect(virDomainObjPtr vm,
if (vm->def->ngraphics == 1 &&
vm->def->graphics[0]->type == VIR_DOMAIN_GRAPHICS_TYPE_VNC) {
int vnc_port = vm->def->graphics[0]->data.vnc.port;
- if (virPortAllocatorSetUsed(data->driver->remotePorts,
- vnc_port,
- true) < 0) {
+ if (virPortAllocatorSetUsed(vnc_port, true) < 0) {
VIR_WARN("Failed to mark VNC port '%d' as used by '%s'",
vnc_port, vm->def->name);
}
diff --git a/src/qemu/qemu_process.c b/src/qemu/qemu_process.c
index a0f430f..b0f8ea8 100644
--- a/src/qemu/qemu_process.c
+++ b/src/qemu/qemu_process.c
@@ -4153,8 +4153,7 @@ qemuProcessStartHook(virQEMUDriverPtr driver,
static int
-qemuProcessGraphicsReservePorts(virQEMUDriverPtr driver,
- virDomainGraphicsDefPtr graphics,
+qemuProcessGraphicsReservePorts(virDomainGraphicsDefPtr graphics,
bool reconnect)
{
virDomainGraphicsListenDefPtr glisten;
@@ -4172,16 +4171,12 @@ qemuProcessGraphicsReservePorts(virQEMUDriverPtr driver,
case VIR_DOMAIN_GRAPHICS_TYPE_VNC:
if (!graphics->data.vnc.autoport ||
reconnect) {
- if (virPortAllocatorSetUsed(driver->remotePorts,
- graphics->data.vnc.port,
- true) < 0)
+ if (virPortAllocatorSetUsed(graphics->data.vnc.port, true) < 0)
return -1;
graphics->data.vnc.portReserved = true;
}
if (graphics->data.vnc.websocket > 0 &&
- virPortAllocatorSetUsed(driver->remotePorts,
- graphics->data.vnc.websocket,
- true) < 0)
+ virPortAllocatorSetUsed(graphics->data.vnc.websocket, true) < 0)
return -1;
break;
@@ -4190,17 +4185,13 @@ qemuProcessGraphicsReservePorts(virQEMUDriverPtr driver,
return 0;
if (graphics->data.spice.port > 0) {
- if (virPortAllocatorSetUsed(driver->remotePorts,
- graphics->data.spice.port,
- true) < 0)
+ if (virPortAllocatorSetUsed(graphics->data.spice.port, true) < 0)
return -1;
graphics->data.spice.portReserved = true;
}
if (graphics->data.spice.tlsPort > 0) {
- if (virPortAllocatorSetUsed(driver->remotePorts,
- graphics->data.spice.tlsPort,
- true) < 0)
+ if (virPortAllocatorSetUsed(graphics->data.spice.tlsPort, true) < 0)
return -1;
graphics->data.spice.tlsPortReserved = true;
}
@@ -4390,7 +4381,7 @@ qemuProcessSetupGraphics(virQEMUDriverPtr driver,
for (i = 0; i < vm->def->ngraphics; i++) {
graphics = vm->def->graphics[i];
- if (qemuProcessGraphicsReservePorts(driver, graphics, false) < 0)
+ if (qemuProcessGraphicsReservePorts(graphics, false) < 0)
goto cleanup;
}
}
@@ -6551,9 +6542,7 @@ void qemuProcessStop(virQEMUDriverPtr driver,
virPortAllocatorRelease(driver->remotePorts,
graphics->data.vnc.port);
} else if (graphics->data.vnc.portReserved) {
- virPortAllocatorSetUsed(driver->remotePorts,
- graphics->data.spice.port,
- false);
+ virPortAllocatorSetUsed(graphics->data.spice.port, false);
graphics->data.vnc.portReserved = false;
}
if (graphics->data.vnc.websocketGenerated) {
@@ -6562,9 +6551,7 @@ void qemuProcessStop(virQEMUDriverPtr driver,
graphics->data.vnc.websocketGenerated = false;
graphics->data.vnc.websocket = -1;
} else if (graphics->data.vnc.websocket) {
- virPortAllocatorSetUsed(driver->remotePorts,
- graphics->data.vnc.websocket,
- false);
+ virPortAllocatorSetUsed(graphics->data.vnc.websocket, false);
}
}
if (graphics->type == VIR_DOMAIN_GRAPHICS_TYPE_SPICE) {
@@ -6575,16 +6562,12 @@ void qemuProcessStop(virQEMUDriverPtr driver,
graphics->data.spice.tlsPort);
} else {
if (graphics->data.spice.portReserved) {
- virPortAllocatorSetUsed(driver->remotePorts,
- graphics->data.spice.port,
- false);
+ virPortAllocatorSetUsed(graphics->data.spice.port, false);
graphics->data.spice.portReserved = false;
}
if (graphics->data.spice.tlsPortReserved) {
- virPortAllocatorSetUsed(driver->remotePorts,
- graphics->data.spice.tlsPort,
- false);
+ virPortAllocatorSetUsed(graphics->data.spice.tlsPort, false);
graphics->data.spice.tlsPortReserved = false;
}
}
@@ -7177,9 +7160,7 @@ qemuProcessReconnect(void *opaque)
}
for (i = 0; i < obj->def->ngraphics; i++) {
- if (qemuProcessGraphicsReservePorts(driver,
- obj->def->graphics[i],
- true) < 0)
+ if (qemuProcessGraphicsReservePorts(obj->def->graphics[i], true) < 0)
goto error;
}
diff --git a/src/util/virportallocator.c b/src/util/virportallocator.c
index cd64356..76346c7 100644
--- a/src/util/virportallocator.c
+++ b/src/util/virportallocator.c
@@ -293,8 +293,7 @@ int virPortAllocatorRelease(virPortRangePtr range,
return ret;
}
-int virPortAllocatorSetUsed(virPortRangePtr range,
- unsigned short port,
+int virPortAllocatorSetUsed(unsigned short port,
bool value)
{
int ret = -1;
@@ -305,12 +304,6 @@ int virPortAllocatorSetUsed(virPortRangePtr range,
virObjectLock(pa);
- if (port < range->start ||
- port > range->end) {
- ret = 0;
- goto cleanup;
- }
-
if (value) {
if (virBitmapIsBitSet(pa->bitmap, port) ||
virBitmapSetBit(pa->bitmap, port) < 0) {
diff --git a/src/util/virportallocator.h b/src/util/virportallocator.h
index e9b9038..8511eca 100644
--- a/src/util/virportallocator.h
+++ b/src/util/virportallocator.h
@@ -45,8 +45,6 @@ int virPortAllocatorAcquire(virPortRangePtr range,
int virPortAllocatorRelease(virPortRangePtr range,
unsigned short port);
-int virPortAllocatorSetUsed(virPortRangePtr range,
- unsigned short port,
- bool value);
+int virPortAllocatorSetUsed(unsigned short port, bool value);
#endif /* __VIR_PORT_ALLOCATOR_H__ */
--
1.8.3.1
--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
On 12/20/2017 07:35 AM, Nikolay Shirokovskiy wrote:
> Range check in virPortAllocatorSetUsed is not useful anymore
> when we manage ports for entire unsigned short range values.
> ---
> src/bhyve/bhyve_command.c | 4 +---
> src/bhyve/bhyve_process.c | 4 +---
> src/qemu/qemu_process.c | 41 +++++++++++------------------------------
> src/util/virportallocator.c | 9 +--------
> src/util/virportallocator.h | 4 +---
> 5 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 47 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/src/util/virportallocator.c b/src/util/virportallocator.c
> index cd64356..76346c7 100644
> --- a/src/util/virportallocator.c
> +++ b/src/util/virportallocator.c
> @@ -293,8 +293,7 @@ int virPortAllocatorRelease(virPortRangePtr range,
> return ret;
> }
>
> -int virPortAllocatorSetUsed(virPortRangePtr range,
> - unsigned short port,
> +int virPortAllocatorSetUsed(unsigned short port,
> bool value)
> {
> int ret = -1;
> @@ -305,12 +304,6 @@ int virPortAllocatorSetUsed(virPortRangePtr range,
>
> virObjectLock(pa);
>
> - if (port < range->start ||
> - port > range->end) {
> - ret = 0;
> - goto cleanup;
> - }
> -
1: ^^^
> if (value) {
> if (virBitmapIsBitSet(pa->bitmap, port) ||
> virBitmapSetBit(pa->bitmap, port) < 0) {
> diff --git a/src/util/virportallocator.h b/src/util/virportallocator.h
> index e9b9038..8511eca 100644
> --- a/src/util/virportallocator.h
> +++ b/src/util/virportallocator.h
> @@ -45,8 +45,6 @@ int virPortAllocatorAcquire(virPortRangePtr range,
> int virPortAllocatorRelease(virPortRangePtr range,
> unsigned short port);
>
> -int virPortAllocatorSetUsed(virPortRangePtr range,
> - unsigned short port,
> - bool value);
> +int virPortAllocatorSetUsed(unsigned short port, bool value);
I'm not a big fan of this. Since virPortRange (or whatever name you'll
give it) is going to have a pointer to virPortAllocator object I rather
leave this signature as is. The idea (hunk 1) makes sense though
Michal
--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
On 29.01.2018 09:09, Michal Privoznik wrote:
> On 12/20/2017 07:35 AM, Nikolay Shirokovskiy wrote:
>> Range check in virPortAllocatorSetUsed is not useful anymore
>> when we manage ports for entire unsigned short range values.
>> ---
>> src/bhyve/bhyve_command.c | 4 +---
>> src/bhyve/bhyve_process.c | 4 +---
>> src/qemu/qemu_process.c | 41 +++++++++++------------------------------
>> src/util/virportallocator.c | 9 +--------
>> src/util/virportallocator.h | 4 +---
>> 5 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 47 deletions(-)
>>
>
>> diff --git a/src/util/virportallocator.c b/src/util/virportallocator.c
>> index cd64356..76346c7 100644
>> --- a/src/util/virportallocator.c
>> +++ b/src/util/virportallocator.c
>> @@ -293,8 +293,7 @@ int virPortAllocatorRelease(virPortRangePtr range,
>> return ret;
>> }
>>
>> -int virPortAllocatorSetUsed(virPortRangePtr range,
>> - unsigned short port,
>> +int virPortAllocatorSetUsed(unsigned short port,
>> bool value)
>> {
>> int ret = -1;
>> @@ -305,12 +304,6 @@ int virPortAllocatorSetUsed(virPortRangePtr range,
>>
>> virObjectLock(pa);
>>
>> - if (port < range->start ||
>> - port > range->end) {
>> - ret = 0;
>> - goto cleanup;
>> - }
>> -
>
>
> 1: ^^^
>
>> if (value) {
>> if (virBitmapIsBitSet(pa->bitmap, port) ||
>> virBitmapSetBit(pa->bitmap, port) < 0) {
>> diff --git a/src/util/virportallocator.h b/src/util/virportallocator.h
>> index e9b9038..8511eca 100644
>> --- a/src/util/virportallocator.h
>> +++ b/src/util/virportallocator.h
>> @@ -45,8 +45,6 @@ int virPortAllocatorAcquire(virPortRangePtr range,
>> int virPortAllocatorRelease(virPortRangePtr range,
>> unsigned short port);
>>
>> -int virPortAllocatorSetUsed(virPortRangePtr range,
>> - unsigned short port,
>> - bool value);
>> +int virPortAllocatorSetUsed(unsigned short port, bool value);
>
> I'm not a big fan of this. Since virPortRange (or whatever name you'll
> give it) is going to have a pointer to virPortAllocator object I rather
> leave this signature as is. The idea (hunk 1) makes sense though
>
So this depends on how we get virPortAllocator object reference. Let's discuss later
after we come to agreement on previous patch.
Nikolay
--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
© 2016 - 2026 Red Hat, Inc.