Range check in virPortAllocatorSetUsed is not useful anymore
when we manage ports for entire unsigned short range values.
---
src/bhyve/bhyve_command.c | 4 +---
src/bhyve/bhyve_process.c | 4 +---
src/qemu/qemu_process.c | 41 +++++++++++------------------------------
src/util/virportallocator.c | 9 +--------
src/util/virportallocator.h | 4 +---
5 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 47 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/bhyve/bhyve_command.c b/src/bhyve/bhyve_command.c
index 55032ae..9d21788 100644
--- a/src/bhyve/bhyve_command.c
+++ b/src/bhyve/bhyve_command.c
@@ -411,9 +411,7 @@ bhyveBuildGraphicsArgStr(const virDomainDef *def,
return -1;
graphics->data.vnc.port = port;
} else {
- if (virPortAllocatorSetUsed(driver->remotePorts,
- graphics->data.vnc.port,
- true) < 0)
+ if (virPortAllocatorSetUsed(graphics->data.vnc.port, true) < 0)
VIR_WARN("Failed to mark VNC port '%d' as used by '%s'",
graphics->data.vnc.port, def->name);
}
diff --git a/src/bhyve/bhyve_process.c b/src/bhyve/bhyve_process.c
index 5076246..e215f6a 100644
--- a/src/bhyve/bhyve_process.c
+++ b/src/bhyve/bhyve_process.c
@@ -425,9 +425,7 @@ virBhyveProcessReconnect(virDomainObjPtr vm,
if (vm->def->ngraphics == 1 &&
vm->def->graphics[0]->type == VIR_DOMAIN_GRAPHICS_TYPE_VNC) {
int vnc_port = vm->def->graphics[0]->data.vnc.port;
- if (virPortAllocatorSetUsed(data->driver->remotePorts,
- vnc_port,
- true) < 0) {
+ if (virPortAllocatorSetUsed(vnc_port, true) < 0) {
VIR_WARN("Failed to mark VNC port '%d' as used by '%s'",
vnc_port, vm->def->name);
}
diff --git a/src/qemu/qemu_process.c b/src/qemu/qemu_process.c
index a0f430f..b0f8ea8 100644
--- a/src/qemu/qemu_process.c
+++ b/src/qemu/qemu_process.c
@@ -4153,8 +4153,7 @@ qemuProcessStartHook(virQEMUDriverPtr driver,
static int
-qemuProcessGraphicsReservePorts(virQEMUDriverPtr driver,
- virDomainGraphicsDefPtr graphics,
+qemuProcessGraphicsReservePorts(virDomainGraphicsDefPtr graphics,
bool reconnect)
{
virDomainGraphicsListenDefPtr glisten;
@@ -4172,16 +4171,12 @@ qemuProcessGraphicsReservePorts(virQEMUDriverPtr driver,
case VIR_DOMAIN_GRAPHICS_TYPE_VNC:
if (!graphics->data.vnc.autoport ||
reconnect) {
- if (virPortAllocatorSetUsed(driver->remotePorts,
- graphics->data.vnc.port,
- true) < 0)
+ if (virPortAllocatorSetUsed(graphics->data.vnc.port, true) < 0)
return -1;
graphics->data.vnc.portReserved = true;
}
if (graphics->data.vnc.websocket > 0 &&
- virPortAllocatorSetUsed(driver->remotePorts,
- graphics->data.vnc.websocket,
- true) < 0)
+ virPortAllocatorSetUsed(graphics->data.vnc.websocket, true) < 0)
return -1;
break;
@@ -4190,17 +4185,13 @@ qemuProcessGraphicsReservePorts(virQEMUDriverPtr driver,
return 0;
if (graphics->data.spice.port > 0) {
- if (virPortAllocatorSetUsed(driver->remotePorts,
- graphics->data.spice.port,
- true) < 0)
+ if (virPortAllocatorSetUsed(graphics->data.spice.port, true) < 0)
return -1;
graphics->data.spice.portReserved = true;
}
if (graphics->data.spice.tlsPort > 0) {
- if (virPortAllocatorSetUsed(driver->remotePorts,
- graphics->data.spice.tlsPort,
- true) < 0)
+ if (virPortAllocatorSetUsed(graphics->data.spice.tlsPort, true) < 0)
return -1;
graphics->data.spice.tlsPortReserved = true;
}
@@ -4390,7 +4381,7 @@ qemuProcessSetupGraphics(virQEMUDriverPtr driver,
for (i = 0; i < vm->def->ngraphics; i++) {
graphics = vm->def->graphics[i];
- if (qemuProcessGraphicsReservePorts(driver, graphics, false) < 0)
+ if (qemuProcessGraphicsReservePorts(graphics, false) < 0)
goto cleanup;
}
}
@@ -6551,9 +6542,7 @@ void qemuProcessStop(virQEMUDriverPtr driver,
virPortAllocatorRelease(driver->remotePorts,
graphics->data.vnc.port);
} else if (graphics->data.vnc.portReserved) {
- virPortAllocatorSetUsed(driver->remotePorts,
- graphics->data.spice.port,
- false);
+ virPortAllocatorSetUsed(graphics->data.spice.port, false);
graphics->data.vnc.portReserved = false;
}
if (graphics->data.vnc.websocketGenerated) {
@@ -6562,9 +6551,7 @@ void qemuProcessStop(virQEMUDriverPtr driver,
graphics->data.vnc.websocketGenerated = false;
graphics->data.vnc.websocket = -1;
} else if (graphics->data.vnc.websocket) {
- virPortAllocatorSetUsed(driver->remotePorts,
- graphics->data.vnc.websocket,
- false);
+ virPortAllocatorSetUsed(graphics->data.vnc.websocket, false);
}
}
if (graphics->type == VIR_DOMAIN_GRAPHICS_TYPE_SPICE) {
@@ -6575,16 +6562,12 @@ void qemuProcessStop(virQEMUDriverPtr driver,
graphics->data.spice.tlsPort);
} else {
if (graphics->data.spice.portReserved) {
- virPortAllocatorSetUsed(driver->remotePorts,
- graphics->data.spice.port,
- false);
+ virPortAllocatorSetUsed(graphics->data.spice.port, false);
graphics->data.spice.portReserved = false;
}
if (graphics->data.spice.tlsPortReserved) {
- virPortAllocatorSetUsed(driver->remotePorts,
- graphics->data.spice.tlsPort,
- false);
+ virPortAllocatorSetUsed(graphics->data.spice.tlsPort, false);
graphics->data.spice.tlsPortReserved = false;
}
}
@@ -7177,9 +7160,7 @@ qemuProcessReconnect(void *opaque)
}
for (i = 0; i < obj->def->ngraphics; i++) {
- if (qemuProcessGraphicsReservePorts(driver,
- obj->def->graphics[i],
- true) < 0)
+ if (qemuProcessGraphicsReservePorts(obj->def->graphics[i], true) < 0)
goto error;
}
diff --git a/src/util/virportallocator.c b/src/util/virportallocator.c
index cd64356..76346c7 100644
--- a/src/util/virportallocator.c
+++ b/src/util/virportallocator.c
@@ -293,8 +293,7 @@ int virPortAllocatorRelease(virPortRangePtr range,
return ret;
}
-int virPortAllocatorSetUsed(virPortRangePtr range,
- unsigned short port,
+int virPortAllocatorSetUsed(unsigned short port,
bool value)
{
int ret = -1;
@@ -305,12 +304,6 @@ int virPortAllocatorSetUsed(virPortRangePtr range,
virObjectLock(pa);
- if (port < range->start ||
- port > range->end) {
- ret = 0;
- goto cleanup;
- }
-
if (value) {
if (virBitmapIsBitSet(pa->bitmap, port) ||
virBitmapSetBit(pa->bitmap, port) < 0) {
diff --git a/src/util/virportallocator.h b/src/util/virportallocator.h
index e9b9038..8511eca 100644
--- a/src/util/virportallocator.h
+++ b/src/util/virportallocator.h
@@ -45,8 +45,6 @@ int virPortAllocatorAcquire(virPortRangePtr range,
int virPortAllocatorRelease(virPortRangePtr range,
unsigned short port);
-int virPortAllocatorSetUsed(virPortRangePtr range,
- unsigned short port,
- bool value);
+int virPortAllocatorSetUsed(unsigned short port, bool value);
#endif /* __VIR_PORT_ALLOCATOR_H__ */
--
1.8.3.1
--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
On 12/20/2017 07:35 AM, Nikolay Shirokovskiy wrote: > Range check in virPortAllocatorSetUsed is not useful anymore > when we manage ports for entire unsigned short range values. > --- > src/bhyve/bhyve_command.c | 4 +--- > src/bhyve/bhyve_process.c | 4 +--- > src/qemu/qemu_process.c | 41 +++++++++++------------------------------ > src/util/virportallocator.c | 9 +-------- > src/util/virportallocator.h | 4 +--- > 5 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 47 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/src/util/virportallocator.c b/src/util/virportallocator.c > index cd64356..76346c7 100644 > --- a/src/util/virportallocator.c > +++ b/src/util/virportallocator.c > @@ -293,8 +293,7 @@ int virPortAllocatorRelease(virPortRangePtr range, > return ret; > } > > -int virPortAllocatorSetUsed(virPortRangePtr range, > - unsigned short port, > +int virPortAllocatorSetUsed(unsigned short port, > bool value) > { > int ret = -1; > @@ -305,12 +304,6 @@ int virPortAllocatorSetUsed(virPortRangePtr range, > > virObjectLock(pa); > > - if (port < range->start || > - port > range->end) { > - ret = 0; > - goto cleanup; > - } > - 1: ^^^ > if (value) { > if (virBitmapIsBitSet(pa->bitmap, port) || > virBitmapSetBit(pa->bitmap, port) < 0) { > diff --git a/src/util/virportallocator.h b/src/util/virportallocator.h > index e9b9038..8511eca 100644 > --- a/src/util/virportallocator.h > +++ b/src/util/virportallocator.h > @@ -45,8 +45,6 @@ int virPortAllocatorAcquire(virPortRangePtr range, > int virPortAllocatorRelease(virPortRangePtr range, > unsigned short port); > > -int virPortAllocatorSetUsed(virPortRangePtr range, > - unsigned short port, > - bool value); > +int virPortAllocatorSetUsed(unsigned short port, bool value); I'm not a big fan of this. Since virPortRange (or whatever name you'll give it) is going to have a pointer to virPortAllocator object I rather leave this signature as is. The idea (hunk 1) makes sense though Michal -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
On 29.01.2018 09:09, Michal Privoznik wrote: > On 12/20/2017 07:35 AM, Nikolay Shirokovskiy wrote: >> Range check in virPortAllocatorSetUsed is not useful anymore >> when we manage ports for entire unsigned short range values. >> --- >> src/bhyve/bhyve_command.c | 4 +--- >> src/bhyve/bhyve_process.c | 4 +--- >> src/qemu/qemu_process.c | 41 +++++++++++------------------------------ >> src/util/virportallocator.c | 9 +-------- >> src/util/virportallocator.h | 4 +--- >> 5 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 47 deletions(-) >> > >> diff --git a/src/util/virportallocator.c b/src/util/virportallocator.c >> index cd64356..76346c7 100644 >> --- a/src/util/virportallocator.c >> +++ b/src/util/virportallocator.c >> @@ -293,8 +293,7 @@ int virPortAllocatorRelease(virPortRangePtr range, >> return ret; >> } >> >> -int virPortAllocatorSetUsed(virPortRangePtr range, >> - unsigned short port, >> +int virPortAllocatorSetUsed(unsigned short port, >> bool value) >> { >> int ret = -1; >> @@ -305,12 +304,6 @@ int virPortAllocatorSetUsed(virPortRangePtr range, >> >> virObjectLock(pa); >> >> - if (port < range->start || >> - port > range->end) { >> - ret = 0; >> - goto cleanup; >> - } >> - > > > 1: ^^^ > >> if (value) { >> if (virBitmapIsBitSet(pa->bitmap, port) || >> virBitmapSetBit(pa->bitmap, port) < 0) { >> diff --git a/src/util/virportallocator.h b/src/util/virportallocator.h >> index e9b9038..8511eca 100644 >> --- a/src/util/virportallocator.h >> +++ b/src/util/virportallocator.h >> @@ -45,8 +45,6 @@ int virPortAllocatorAcquire(virPortRangePtr range, >> int virPortAllocatorRelease(virPortRangePtr range, >> unsigned short port); >> >> -int virPortAllocatorSetUsed(virPortRangePtr range, >> - unsigned short port, >> - bool value); >> +int virPortAllocatorSetUsed(unsigned short port, bool value); > > I'm not a big fan of this. Since virPortRange (or whatever name you'll > give it) is going to have a pointer to virPortAllocator object I rather > leave this signature as is. The idea (hunk 1) makes sense though > So this depends on how we get virPortAllocator object reference. Let's discuss later after we come to agreement on previous patch. Nikolay -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
© 2016 - 2025 Red Hat, Inc.