On Fri, Apr 07, 2017 at 09:53:40 -0400, John Ferlan wrote:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1439132
>
> Add "bsd" to the list of format types to not checked during blkid
> processing even though it supposedly knows the format - for some
> (now unknown) reason it's returning partiion not found. So let's
s/partiion/partition/
Also it's not really a partition, it's a disklabel or partition table.
> just let PARTED handle "bsd" too.
>
> Signed-off-by: John Ferlan <jferlan@redhat.com>
> ---
>
> Difference to v1: Just pull out and send separately.
>
> src/storage/storage_util.c | 6 ++++--
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/src/storage/storage_util.c b/src/storage/storage_util.c
> index 4ced81e..812429e 100644
> --- a/src/storage/storage_util.c
> +++ b/src/storage/storage_util.c
> @@ -3034,10 +3034,12 @@ virStorageBackendBLKIDFindPart(blkid_probe probe,
>
> /* A blkid_known_pttype on "dvh" and "pc98" returns a failure;
> * however, the blkid_do_probe for "dvh" returns "sgi" and
> - * for "pc98" it returns "dos". So since those will cause problems
> + * for "pc98" it returns "dos". Although "bsd" is recognized,
> + * it seems that the parted created partition table is not being
> + * properly recogized. Since each of these will cause problems
> * with startup comparison, let's just treat them as UNKNOWN causing
> * the caller to fallback to using PARTED */
> - if (STREQ(format, "dvh") || STREQ(format, "pc98"))
> + if (STREQ(format, "dvh") || STREQ(format, "pc98") || STREQ(format, "bsd"))
> return VIR_STORAGE_BLKID_PROBE_UNKNOWN;
>
> /* Make sure we're doing a partitions probe from the start */
ACK
--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list