On 11/24/2017 06:18 PM, John Ferlan wrote:
> Don't use a unary comparison for an int value - compare against zero
> directly instead.
>
> Signed-off-by: John Ferlan <jferlan@redhat.com>
> ---
> src/conf/numa_conf.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/src/conf/numa_conf.c b/src/conf/numa_conf.c
> index 3aae705a5d..eadf8f2282 100644
> --- a/src/conf/numa_conf.c
> +++ b/src/conf/numa_conf.c
> @@ -992,7 +992,7 @@ virDomainNumaDefCPUFormatXML(virBufferPtr buf,
> virDomainMemoryAccessTypeToString(memAccess));
>
> ndistances = def->mem_nodes[i].ndistances;
> - if (!ndistances) {
> + if (ndistances == 0) {
> virBufferAddLit(buf, "/>\n");
> } else {
> size_t j;
>
You know that I don't care that much :-) But at the same time, if !int
and int == 0 are equal to me, but you prefer one, we can use the one you
prefer (since those two options are equal to me).
Michal
--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list