From nobody Wed May 14 23:39:50 2025 Delivered-To: importer@patchew.org Received-SPF: pass (zoho.com: domain of redhat.com designates 209.132.183.28 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.183.28; envelope-from=libvir-list-bounces@redhat.com; helo=mx1.redhat.com; Authentication-Results: mx.zohomail.com; spf=pass (zoho.com: domain of redhat.com designates 209.132.183.28 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=libvir-list-bounces@redhat.com Return-Path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx1.redhat.com [209.132.183.28]) by mx.zohomail.com with SMTPS id 151975005056570.59913259678217; Tue, 27 Feb 2018 08:47:30 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 774732C9711; Tue, 27 Feb 2018 16:47:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from colo-mx.corp.redhat.com (colo-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.21]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 465C919E2E; Tue, 27 Feb 2018 16:47:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists01.pubmisc.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com (lists01.pubmisc.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.19.33]) by colo-mx.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC1FB4A47D; Tue, 27 Feb 2018 16:46:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx04.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.4]) by lists01.pubmisc.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id w1RGkR1i021823 for ; Tue, 27 Feb 2018 11:46:27 -0500 Received: by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) id E24CF2026E04; Tue, 27 Feb 2018 16:46:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from inaba.usersys.redhat.com (unknown [10.43.2.98]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8A0982024CA2 for ; Tue, 27 Feb 2018 16:46:26 +0000 (UTC) From: Andrea Bolognani To: libvir-list@redhat.com Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2018 17:46:14 +0100 Message-Id: <20180227164618.31590-8-abologna@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20180227164618.31590-1-abologna@redhat.com> References: <20180227164618.31590-1-abologna@redhat.com> X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.78 on 10.11.54.4 X-loop: libvir-list@redhat.com Subject: [libvirt] [PATCH v4 07/11] qemu: Validate PCI controller options (numaNode) X-BeenThere: libvir-list@redhat.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: junk List-Id: Development discussions about the libvirt library & tools List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Sender: libvir-list-bounces@redhat.com Errors-To: libvir-list-bounces@redhat.com X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.11 X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.29]); Tue, 27 Feb 2018 16:47:29 +0000 (UTC) X-ZohoMail: RSF_0 Z_629925259 SPT_0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" This change catches an invalid use of the option in our test suite. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3D1483816 Signed-off-by: Andrea Bolognani --- src/qemu/qemu_domain.c | 54 ++++++++++++++++++++++= ++++ tests/qemuxml2argvdata/pcie-expander-bus.xml | 3 -- tests/qemuxml2xmloutdata/pcie-expander-bus.xml | 4 +- 3 files changed, 55 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/qemu/qemu_domain.c b/src/qemu/qemu_domain.c index 4cc7482c06..f8c7c03dc2 100644 --- a/src/qemu/qemu_domain.c +++ b/src/qemu/qemu_domain.c @@ -4763,6 +4763,60 @@ qemuDomainDeviceDefValidateControllerPCI(const virDo= mainControllerDef *cont, return -1; } =20 + /* numaNode */ + switch ((virDomainControllerModelPCI) cont->model) { + case VIR_DOMAIN_CONTROLLER_MODEL_PCI_EXPANDER_BUS: + case VIR_DOMAIN_CONTROLLER_MODEL_PCIE_EXPANDER_BUS: + /* numaNode can be used for these controllers, but it's not set + * automatically so it can be missing */ + break; + + case VIR_DOMAIN_CONTROLLER_MODEL_PCI_ROOT: + /* Only PHBs support numaNode */ + if (pciopts->numaNode !=3D -1 && + pciopts->modelName !=3D VIR_DOMAIN_CONTROLLER_PCI_MODEL_NAME_S= PAPR_PCI_HOST_BRIDGE) { + virReportError(VIR_ERR_CONFIG_UNSUPPORTED, + _("Option '%s' is not valid for '%s' controller= "), + "numaNode", model); + return -1; + } + + /* However, the default PHB doesn't support numaNode */ + if (pciopts->numaNode !=3D -1 && + pciopts->modelName =3D=3D VIR_DOMAIN_CONTROLLER_PCI_MODEL_NAME= _SPAPR_PCI_HOST_BRIDGE && + pciopts->targetIndex =3D=3D 0) { + virReportError(VIR_ERR_CONFIG_UNSUPPORTED, + _("Option '%s' is not valid for '%s' controller= " + "with '%s' equal to 0"), + "numaNode", model, + "targetIndex"); + return -1; + } + break; + + case VIR_DOMAIN_CONTROLLER_MODEL_PCI_BRIDGE: + case VIR_DOMAIN_CONTROLLER_MODEL_DMI_TO_PCI_BRIDGE: + case VIR_DOMAIN_CONTROLLER_MODEL_PCIE_ROOT_PORT: + case VIR_DOMAIN_CONTROLLER_MODEL_PCIE_SWITCH_UPSTREAM_PORT: + case VIR_DOMAIN_CONTROLLER_MODEL_PCIE_SWITCH_DOWNSTREAM_PORT: + case VIR_DOMAIN_CONTROLLER_MODEL_PCIE_ROOT: + if (pciopts->numaNode !=3D -1) { + virReportError(VIR_ERR_CONFIG_UNSUPPORTED, + _("Option '%s' is not valid for '%s' controller= "), + "numaNode", model); + return -1; + } + break; + + case VIR_DOMAIN_CONTROLLER_MODEL_PCI_DEFAULT: + case VIR_DOMAIN_CONTROLLER_MODEL_PCI_LAST: + default: + virReportError(VIR_ERR_INTERNAL_ERROR, + _("Invalid '%s' value '%d'"), + "virDomainControllerModelPCI", cont->model); + return -1; + } + return qemuDomainDeviceDefValidateControllerPCIOld(cont, def, qemuCaps= ); } =20 diff --git a/tests/qemuxml2argvdata/pcie-expander-bus.xml b/tests/qemuxml2a= rgvdata/pcie-expander-bus.xml index 237430a1e5..5c5d34d1e0 100644 --- a/tests/qemuxml2argvdata/pcie-expander-bus.xml +++ b/tests/qemuxml2argvdata/pcie-expander-bus.xml @@ -35,9 +35,6 @@
- - 1 -
diff --git a/tests/qemuxml2xmloutdata/pcie-expander-bus.xml b/tests/qemuxml= 2xmloutdata/pcie-expander-bus.xml index d5e741b80d..b6498fd2eb 100644 --- a/tests/qemuxml2xmloutdata/pcie-expander-bus.xml +++ b/tests/qemuxml2xmloutdata/pcie-expander-bus.xml @@ -36,9 +36,7 @@ - - 1 - +
--=20 2.14.3 -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list