They are no longer relevant and misleading.
Signed-off-by: Andrea Bolognani <abologna@redhat.com>
---
prepare-release.sh | 14 +++-----------
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/prepare-release.sh b/prepare-release.sh
index 8a6d102..22f9155 100755
--- a/prepare-release.sh
+++ b/prepare-release.sh
@@ -1,21 +1,17 @@
#!/bin/sh
-#
-# This script is used to Test::AutoBuild (http://www.autobuild.org)
-# to perform automated builds of the Sys-Virt module
NAME=Sys-Virt
set -e
test -n "$1" && RESULTS=$1 || RESULTS=results.log
-: ${AUTOBUILD_INSTALL_ROOT=$HOME/builder}
make -k realclean ||:
rm -rf MANIFEST blib pm_to_blib
export TEST_MAINTAINER=1
-perl Makefile.PL PREFIX=$AUTOBUILD_INSTALL_ROOT
+perl Makefile.PL PREFIX=$HOME/builder
rm -f MANIFEST
@@ -56,12 +52,8 @@ rm -f $NAME-*.tar.gz
make dist
if [ -f /usr/bin/rpmbuild ]; then
- if [ -n "$AUTOBUILD_COUNTER" ]; then
- EXTRA_RELEASE=".auto$AUTOBUILD_COUNTER"
- else
- NOW=`date +"%s"`
- EXTRA_RELEASE=".$USER$NOW"
- fi
+ NOW=`date +"%s"`
+ EXTRA_RELEASE=".$USER$NOW"
rpmbuild --nodeps -ta --define "extra_release $EXTRA_RELEASE" --clean $NAME-*.tar.gz
fi
--
2.17.0
--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
On Fri, May 04, 2018 at 02:20:25PM +0200, Andrea Bolognani wrote: > They are no longer relevant and misleading. > > Signed-off-by: Andrea Bolognani <abologna@redhat.com> > --- > prepare-release.sh | 14 +++----------- > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/prepare-release.sh b/prepare-release.sh > index 8a6d102..22f9155 100755 > --- a/prepare-release.sh > +++ b/prepare-release.sh > @@ -1,21 +1,17 @@ > #!/bin/sh > -# > -# This script is used to Test::AutoBuild (http://www.autobuild.org) > -# to perform automated builds of the Sys-Virt module > > NAME=Sys-Virt > > set -e > > test -n "$1" && RESULTS=$1 || RESULTS=results.log > -: ${AUTOBUILD_INSTALL_ROOT=$HOME/builder} > > make -k realclean ||: > rm -rf MANIFEST blib pm_to_blib > > export TEST_MAINTAINER=1 > > -perl Makefile.PL PREFIX=$AUTOBUILD_INSTALL_ROOT > +perl Makefile.PL PREFIX=$HOME/builder > > rm -f MANIFEST > > @@ -56,12 +52,8 @@ rm -f $NAME-*.tar.gz > make dist > > if [ -f /usr/bin/rpmbuild ]; then > - if [ -n "$AUTOBUILD_COUNTER" ]; then > - EXTRA_RELEASE=".auto$AUTOBUILD_COUNTER" > - else > - NOW=`date +"%s"` > - EXTRA_RELEASE=".$USER$NOW" > - fi > + NOW=`date +"%s"` > + EXTRA_RELEASE=".$USER$NOW" > rpmbuild --nodeps -ta --define "extra_release $EXTRA_RELEASE" --clean $NAME-*.tar.gz > fi We can actually chop the 'extra_release' bit out of the RPM spec entirely, as it is only useful for automated CI builds. Regards, Daniel -- |: https://berrange.com -o- https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :| |: https://libvirt.org -o- https://fstop138.berrange.com :| |: https://entangle-photo.org -o- https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :| -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
On Fri, 2018-05-04 at 13:38 +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > On Fri, May 04, 2018 at 02:20:25PM +0200, Andrea Bolognani wrote: [...] > > if [ -f /usr/bin/rpmbuild ]; then > > - if [ -n "$AUTOBUILD_COUNTER" ]; then > > - EXTRA_RELEASE=".auto$AUTOBUILD_COUNTER" > > - else > > - NOW=`date +"%s"` > > - EXTRA_RELEASE=".$USER$NOW" > > - fi > > + NOW=`date +"%s"` > > + EXTRA_RELEASE=".$USER$NOW" > > rpmbuild --nodeps -ta --define "extra_release $EXTRA_RELEASE" --clean $NAME-*.tar.gz > > fi > > We can actually chop the 'extra_release' bit out of the RPM spec > entirely, as it is only useful for automated CI builds. Neat. I assume you meant that we can avoid defining it when calling rpmbuild in the script, not that we want to remove it from the spec altogether, right? The latter can still be useful. Can I just squash in the following diff and push, or do you want me to respin? diff --git a/prepare-release.sh b/prepare-release.sh index 22f9155..25a5cda 100755 --- a/prepare-release.sh +++ b/prepare-release.sh @@ -52,9 +52,7 @@ rm -f $NAME-*.tar.gz make dist if [ -f /usr/bin/rpmbuild ]; then - NOW=`date +"%s"` - EXTRA_RELEASE=".$USER$NOW" - rpmbuild --nodeps -ta --define "extra_release $EXTRA_RELEASE" --clean $NAME-*.tar.gz + rpmbuild --nodeps -ta --clean $NAME-*.tar.gz fi # Skip debian pkg for now -- Andrea Bolognani / Red Hat / Virtualization -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
On Fri, May 04, 2018 at 03:14:04PM +0200, Andrea Bolognani wrote: > On Fri, 2018-05-04 at 13:38 +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > > On Fri, May 04, 2018 at 02:20:25PM +0200, Andrea Bolognani wrote: > [...] > > > if [ -f /usr/bin/rpmbuild ]; then > > > - if [ -n "$AUTOBUILD_COUNTER" ]; then > > > - EXTRA_RELEASE=".auto$AUTOBUILD_COUNTER" > > > - else > > > - NOW=`date +"%s"` > > > - EXTRA_RELEASE=".$USER$NOW" > > > - fi > > > + NOW=`date +"%s"` > > > + EXTRA_RELEASE=".$USER$NOW" > > > rpmbuild --nodeps -ta --define "extra_release $EXTRA_RELEASE" --clean $NAME-*.tar.gz > > > fi > > > > We can actually chop the 'extra_release' bit out of the RPM spec > > entirely, as it is only useful for automated CI builds. > > Neat. I assume you meant that we can avoid defining it when calling > rpmbuild in the script, not that we want to remove it from the spec > altogether, right? The latter can still be useful. I did actually mean removing it from the RPM spec entirely - Fedora reviewers have complained about it existing multiple times, but at least in past I could justify it for CI purposes. > > Can I just squash in the following diff and push, or do you want me > to respin? > > > diff --git a/prepare-release.sh b/prepare-release.sh > index 22f9155..25a5cda 100755 > --- a/prepare-release.sh > +++ b/prepare-release.sh > @@ -52,9 +52,7 @@ rm -f $NAME-*.tar.gz > make dist > > if [ -f /usr/bin/rpmbuild ]; then > - NOW=`date +"%s"` > - EXTRA_RELEASE=".$USER$NOW" > - rpmbuild --nodeps -ta --define "extra_release $EXTRA_RELEASE" --clean $NAME-*.tar.gz > + rpmbuild --nodeps -ta --clean $NAME-*.tar.gz > fi > > # Skip debian pkg for now > -- > Andrea Bolognani / Red Hat / Virtualization Regards, Daniel -- |: https://berrange.com -o- https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :| |: https://libvirt.org -o- https://fstop138.berrange.com :| |: https://entangle-photo.org -o- https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :| -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
On Fri, 2018-05-04 at 14:20 +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > On Fri, May 04, 2018 at 03:14:04PM +0200, Andrea Bolognani wrote: > > On Fri, 2018-05-04 at 13:38 +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > > > We can actually chop the 'extra_release' bit out of the RPM spec > > > entirely, as it is only useful for automated CI builds. > > > > Neat. I assume you meant that we can avoid defining it when calling > > rpmbuild in the script, not that we want to remove it from the spec > > altogether, right? The latter can still be useful. > > I did actually mean removing it from the RPM spec entirely - Fedora > reviewers have complained about it existing multiple times, but at > least in past I could justify it for CI purposes. Not sure I agree, but I don't feel strongly enough to oppose the change either :) That IMHO puts it squarely into separate patch territory though, so if you're okay with it I'll push this one as originally posted and follow up with another that drops extra_release completely. -- Andrea Bolognani / Red Hat / Virtualization -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
On Fri, May 04, 2018 at 03:37:50PM +0200, Andrea Bolognani wrote: > On Fri, 2018-05-04 at 14:20 +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > > On Fri, May 04, 2018 at 03:14:04PM +0200, Andrea Bolognani wrote: > > > On Fri, 2018-05-04 at 13:38 +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > > > > We can actually chop the 'extra_release' bit out of the RPM spec > > > > entirely, as it is only useful for automated CI builds. > > > > > > Neat. I assume you meant that we can avoid defining it when calling > > > rpmbuild in the script, not that we want to remove it from the spec > > > altogether, right? The latter can still be useful. > > > > I did actually mean removing it from the RPM spec entirely - Fedora > > reviewers have complained about it existing multiple times, but at > > least in past I could justify it for CI purposes. > > Not sure I agree, but I don't feel strongly enough to oppose the > change either :) > > That IMHO puts it squarely into separate patch territory though, > so if you're okay with it I'll push this one as originally posted > and follow up with another that drops extra_release completely. Sure, consider it Reviewed-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com> Regards, Daniel -- |: https://berrange.com -o- https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :| |: https://libvirt.org -o- https://fstop138.berrange.com :| |: https://entangle-photo.org -o- https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :| -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
© 2016 - 2025 Red Hat, Inc.