From nobody Wed May 14 20:51:20 2025 Delivered-To: importer@patchew.org Received-SPF: pass (zoho.com: domain of redhat.com designates 209.132.183.28 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.183.28; envelope-from=libvir-list-bounces@redhat.com; helo=mx1.redhat.com; Authentication-Results: mx.zohomail.com; spf=pass (zoho.com: domain of redhat.com designates 209.132.183.28 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=libvir-list-bounces@redhat.com; dmarc=pass(p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Return-Path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx1.redhat.com [209.132.183.28]) by mx.zohomail.com with SMTPS id 1518617850136878.7745101315638; Wed, 14 Feb 2018 06:17:30 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx06.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.16]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8C1C15B30A; Wed, 14 Feb 2018 14:17:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from colo-mx.corp.redhat.com (colo-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.21]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 62F695C890; Wed, 14 Feb 2018 14:17:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists01.pubmisc.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com (lists01.pubmisc.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.19.33]) by colo-mx.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 248A94A470; Wed, 14 Feb 2018 14:17:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx04.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.4]) by lists01.pubmisc.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id w1EEBiHK006812 for ; Wed, 14 Feb 2018 09:11:44 -0500 Received: by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) id EC6472024CA8; Wed, 14 Feb 2018 14:11:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from virval.usersys.redhat.com (unknown [10.43.2.20]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CC5952024CA4 for ; Wed, 14 Feb 2018 14:11:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: by virval.usersys.redhat.com (Postfix, from userid 500) id D4D251008E9; Wed, 14 Feb 2018 15:11:42 +0100 (CET) From: Jiri Denemark To: libvir-list@redhat.com Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2018 15:11:36 +0100 Message-Id: <509ec56e282965438685e1e4156826335703ccc9.1518616951.git.jdenemar@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: References: In-Reply-To: References: Mail-Followup-To: libvir-list@redhat.com X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.78 on 10.11.54.4 X-loop: libvir-list@redhat.com Subject: [libvirt] [PATCH 1/6] spec: Enable fuse only if LXC is enabled X-BeenThere: libvir-list@redhat.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: junk List-Id: Development discussions about the libvirt library & tools List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Sender: libvir-list-bounces@redhat.com Errors-To: libvir-list-bounces@redhat.com X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.16 X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.26]); Wed, 14 Feb 2018 14:17:28 +0000 (UTC) X-ZohoMail: RSF_0 Z_629925259 SPT_0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Enabling fuse without LXC does not make a lot of sense because fuse is used only by LXC. Signed-off-by: Jiri Denemark Reviewed-by: Daniel P. Berrang=C3=A9 --- libvirt.spec.in | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/libvirt.spec.in b/libvirt.spec.in index 44f846a169..4821da826e 100644 --- a/libvirt.spec.in +++ b/libvirt.spec.in @@ -163,7 +163,7 @@ %endif =20 # fuse is used to provide virtualized /proc for LXC -%if 0%{?fedora} || 0%{?rhel} >=3D 7 +%if %{with_lxc} %define with_fuse 0%{!?_without_fuse:1} %endif =20 --=20 2.16.1 -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list