From nobody Wed May 14 23:55:40 2025 Delivered-To: importer@patchew.org Received-SPF: pass (zoho.com: domain of redhat.com designates 209.132.183.28 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.183.28; envelope-from=libvir-list-bounces@redhat.com; helo=mx1.redhat.com; Authentication-Results: mx.zohomail.com; spf=pass (zoho.com: domain of redhat.com designates 209.132.183.28 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=libvir-list-bounces@redhat.com; dmarc=pass(p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Return-Path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx1.redhat.com [209.132.183.28]) by mx.zohomail.com with SMTPS id 151959879893623.240012316472644; Sun, 25 Feb 2018 14:46:38 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx05.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.15]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 509BD7ED0A; Sun, 25 Feb 2018 22:46:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from colo-mx.corp.redhat.com (colo-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.20]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1D8B25D75F; Sun, 25 Feb 2018 22:46:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists01.pubmisc.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com (lists01.pubmisc.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.19.33]) by colo-mx.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C460318033EF; Sun, 25 Feb 2018 22:46:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx05.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.5]) by lists01.pubmisc.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id w1PMk7r5025760 for ; Sun, 25 Feb 2018 17:46:07 -0500 Received: by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) id 19291AFD7D; Sun, 25 Feb 2018 22:46:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ridgehead.usersys.redhat.com (ovpn-200-23.brq.redhat.com [10.40.200.23]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14C5115562; Sun, 25 Feb 2018 22:46:04 +0000 (UTC) From: Erik Skultety To: libvir-list@redhat.com Date: Sun, 25 Feb 2018 23:45:45 +0100 Message-Id: <763da99313168c6bc475509d256d870bd7065424.1519598619.git.eskultet@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: References: In-Reply-To: References: X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.11.54.5 X-loop: libvir-list@redhat.com Cc: Erik Skultety Subject: [libvirt] [PATCH 2/2] docs: logos: Resize the 'Drop shadow' filter bounding box X-BeenThere: libvir-list@redhat.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: junk List-Id: Development discussions about the libvirt library & tools List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Sender: libvir-list-bounces@redhat.com Errors-To: libvir-list-bounces@redhat.com X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.15 X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.28]); Sun, 25 Feb 2018 22:46:36 +0000 (UTC) X-ZohoMail: RSF_0 Z_629925259 SPT_0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Inkscape makes "Drop shadow" filter's bounding box unnecessarily large. Since inkscape will make a union of all the objects to form an image, which means that our logos end up having an undesired "space" padding from one side only which in turn makes usage of vertical alignment of objects clumsy, since it the spacing would always make it look as out of alignment. The official way to "fix" this is to fiddle with the coordinates of the box and adjust its dimensions, not ideal as it lacks precision, but makes a difference. Signed-off-by: Erik Skultety --- docs/logos/logo-banner-dark.svg | 6 +++++- docs/logos/logo-banner-light.svg | 6 +++++- 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/docs/logos/logo-banner-dark.svg b/docs/logos/logo-banner-dark.= svg index 0af83fd59..47080bb40 100644 --- a/docs/logos/logo-banner-dark.svg +++ b/docs/logos/logo-banner-dark.svg @@ -22,7 +22,11 @@ + id=3D"filter5799" + x=3D"-0.030000000000000000" + y=3D"-0.030000000000000000" + width=3D"1.0800000000000000" + height=3D"1.0800000000000000"> + id=3D"filter5799-39" + x=3D"-0.030000000000000000" + y=3D"-0.030000000000000000" + width=3D"1.0800000000000000" + height=3D"1.0800000000000000">