I like to use it that way and every time I try running it I just
instinctively use '-i' (like with sed, etc.) and it makes sense, IMHO.
Signed-off-by: Martin Kletzander <mkletzan@redhat.com>
---
tests/test-wrap-argv.pl | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/tests/test-wrap-argv.pl b/tests/test-wrap-argv.pl
index f0d3c0ba2d10..7867e9d7194e 100755
--- a/tests/test-wrap-argv.pl
+++ b/tests/test-wrap-argv.pl
@@ -31,7 +31,7 @@
$in_place = 0;
$check = 0;
-if (@ARGV[0] eq "--in-place") {
+if (@ARGV[0] eq "--in-place" or @ARGV[0] eq "-i") {
$in_place = 1;
shift @ARGV;
} elsif (@ARGV[0] eq "--check") {
--
2.12.2
--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
On Fri, May 12, 2017 at 03:11:27PM +0200, Martin Kletzander wrote: > I like to use it that way and every time I try running it I just > instinctively use '-i' (like with sed, etc.) and it makes sense, IMHO. > > Signed-off-by: Martin Kletzander <mkletzan@redhat.com> > --- > tests/test-wrap-argv.pl | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) Reviewed-by: Pavel Hrdina <phrdina@redhat.com> -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
On Fri, May 12, 2017 at 03:15:58PM +0200, Pavel Hrdina wrote: >On Fri, May 12, 2017 at 03:11:27PM +0200, Martin Kletzander wrote: >> I like to use it that way and every time I try running it I just >> instinctively use '-i' (like with sed, etc.) and it makes sense, IMHO. >> >> Signed-off-by: Martin Kletzander <mkletzan@redhat.com> >> --- >> tests/test-wrap-argv.pl | 2 +- >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > >Reviewed-by: Pavel Hrdina <phrdina@redhat.com> Does that mean ACK? -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
On Fri, May 12, 2017 at 03:59:46PM +0200, Martin Kletzander wrote: > On Fri, May 12, 2017 at 03:15:58PM +0200, Pavel Hrdina wrote: > >On Fri, May 12, 2017 at 03:11:27PM +0200, Martin Kletzander wrote: > >> I like to use it that way and every time I try running it I just > >> instinctively use '-i' (like with sed, etc.) and it makes sense, IMHO. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Martin Kletzander <mkletzan@redhat.com> > >> --- > >> tests/test-wrap-argv.pl | 2 +- > >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > >Reviewed-by: Pavel Hrdina <phrdina@redhat.com> > > Does that mean ACK? https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/submitting-patches.html#reviewer-s-statement-of-oversight s/kernel/libvirt/ for the text Pavel -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
On Fri, May 12, 2017 at 04:12:06PM +0200, Pavel Hrdina wrote: >On Fri, May 12, 2017 at 03:59:46PM +0200, Martin Kletzander wrote: >> On Fri, May 12, 2017 at 03:15:58PM +0200, Pavel Hrdina wrote: >> >On Fri, May 12, 2017 at 03:11:27PM +0200, Martin Kletzander wrote: >> >> I like to use it that way and every time I try running it I just >> >> instinctively use '-i' (like with sed, etc.) and it makes sense, IMHO. >> >> >> >> Signed-off-by: Martin Kletzander <mkletzan@redhat.com> >> >> --- >> >> tests/test-wrap-argv.pl | 2 +- >> >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) >> > >> >Reviewed-by: Pavel Hrdina <phrdina@redhat.com> >> >> Does that mean ACK? > >https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/submitting-patches.html#reviewer-s-statement-of-oversight > >s/kernel/libvirt/ for the text > Honestly, I didn't know there is also definition of other -by:'s, I probably read those docs back when there was just Signed-of-by definition. So thanks for new info ;) Anyway, do we have some documentation about libvirt using these tags as well? I only remember talking about S-o-b being "preferred", not even required. Any news on that front? BTW: I'll push this in a while. >Pavel -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
On Fri, May 12, 2017 at 04:32:15PM +0200, Martin Kletzander wrote: > On Fri, May 12, 2017 at 04:12:06PM +0200, Pavel Hrdina wrote: > >On Fri, May 12, 2017 at 03:59:46PM +0200, Martin Kletzander wrote: > >> On Fri, May 12, 2017 at 03:15:58PM +0200, Pavel Hrdina wrote: > >> >On Fri, May 12, 2017 at 03:11:27PM +0200, Martin Kletzander wrote: > >> >> I like to use it that way and every time I try running it I just > >> >> instinctively use '-i' (like with sed, etc.) and it makes sense, IMHO. > >> >> > >> >> Signed-off-by: Martin Kletzander <mkletzan@redhat.com> > >> >> --- > >> >> tests/test-wrap-argv.pl | 2 +- > >> >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > >> > > >> >Reviewed-by: Pavel Hrdina <phrdina@redhat.com> > >> > >> Does that mean ACK? > > > >https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/submitting-patches.html#reviewer-s-statement-of-oversight > > > >s/kernel/libvirt/ for the text > > > > Honestly, I didn't know there is also definition of other -by:'s, I > probably read those docs back when there was just Signed-of-by > definition. So thanks for new info ;) Anyway, do we have some > documentation about libvirt using these tags as well? I only remember > talking about S-o-b being "preferred", not even required. Any news on > that front? BTW: I'll push this in a while. No there is no documentation yet and nothing is required. I just like the idea of using Signed-of-by, Reviewed-by, Tested-by and Reported-by tags :) . Pavel -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
On Fri, May 12, 2017 at 03:11:27PM +0200, Martin Kletzander wrote: >I like to use it that way and every time I try running it I just >instinctively use '-i' (like with sed, etc.) and it makes sense, IMHO. > >Signed-off-by: Martin Kletzander <mkletzan@redhat.com> >--- > tests/test-wrap-argv.pl | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > >diff --git a/tests/test-wrap-argv.pl b/tests/test-wrap-argv.pl >index f0d3c0ba2d10..7867e9d7194e 100755 >--- a/tests/test-wrap-argv.pl >+++ b/tests/test-wrap-argv.pl >@@ -31,7 +31,7 @@ > $in_place = 0; > $check = 0; > >-if (@ARGV[0] eq "--in-place") { >+if (@ARGV[0] eq "--in-place" or @ARGV[0] eq "-i") { > $in_place = 1; > shift @ARGV; > } elsif (@ARGV[0] eq "--check") { or @ARGV[0] eq "-c" maybe? Jan -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
On Fri, May 12, 2017 at 03:23:27PM +0200, Ján Tomko wrote: >On Fri, May 12, 2017 at 03:11:27PM +0200, Martin Kletzander wrote: >>I like to use it that way and every time I try running it I just >>instinctively use '-i' (like with sed, etc.) and it makes sense, IMHO. >> >>Signed-off-by: Martin Kletzander <mkletzan@redhat.com> >>--- >> tests/test-wrap-argv.pl | 2 +- >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) >> >>diff --git a/tests/test-wrap-argv.pl b/tests/test-wrap-argv.pl >>index f0d3c0ba2d10..7867e9d7194e 100755 >>--- a/tests/test-wrap-argv.pl >>+++ b/tests/test-wrap-argv.pl >>@@ -31,7 +31,7 @@ >> $in_place = 0; >> $check = 0; >> >>-if (@ARGV[0] eq "--in-place") { >>+if (@ARGV[0] eq "--in-place" or @ARGV[0] eq "-i") { >> $in_place = 1; >> shift @ARGV; >> } elsif (@ARGV[0] eq "--check") { > >or @ARGV[0] eq "-c" maybe? > Does that mean ACK with that added as well? >Jan -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
On Fri, May 12, 2017 at 04:00:06PM +0200, Martin Kletzander wrote: >On Fri, May 12, 2017 at 03:23:27PM +0200, Ján Tomko wrote: >>On Fri, May 12, 2017 at 03:11:27PM +0200, Martin Kletzander wrote: >>>I like to use it that way and every time I try running it I just >>>instinctively use '-i' (like with sed, etc.) and it makes sense, IMHO. >>> >>>Signed-off-by: Martin Kletzander <mkletzan@redhat.com> >>>--- >>> tests/test-wrap-argv.pl | 2 +- >>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) >>> >>>diff --git a/tests/test-wrap-argv.pl b/tests/test-wrap-argv.pl >>>index f0d3c0ba2d10..7867e9d7194e 100755 >>>--- a/tests/test-wrap-argv.pl >>>+++ b/tests/test-wrap-argv.pl >>>@@ -31,7 +31,7 @@ >>> $in_place = 0; >>> $check = 0; >>> >>>-if (@ARGV[0] eq "--in-place") { >>>+if (@ARGV[0] eq "--in-place" or @ARGV[0] eq "-i") { >>> $in_place = 1; >>> shift @ARGV; >>> } elsif (@ARGV[0] eq "--check") { >> >>or @ARGV[0] eq "-c" maybe? >> > >Does that mean ACK with that added as well? Hopefully P.H.'s R-b served as an ACK. It was just a thought I had and liked so much I had to share it with the world. Feel free to include it in the commit or disregard it completely. Have a nice weekend. Jan -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
© 2016 - 2025 Red Hat, Inc.