From nobody Wed May 14 23:19:37 2025 Delivered-To: importer@patchew.org Received-SPF: pass (zoho.com: domain of redhat.com designates 209.132.183.28 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.183.28; envelope-from=libvir-list-bounces@redhat.com; helo=mx1.redhat.com; Authentication-Results: mx.zohomail.com; spf=pass (zoho.com: domain of redhat.com designates 209.132.183.28 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=libvir-list-bounces@redhat.com Return-Path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx1.redhat.com [209.132.183.28]) by mx.zohomail.com with SMTPS id 1515537973343298.8215685749361; Tue, 9 Jan 2018 14:46:13 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx03.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.13]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AA310C0587FA; Tue, 9 Jan 2018 22:46:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from colo-mx.corp.redhat.com (colo-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.21]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3905E17A9F; Tue, 9 Jan 2018 22:46:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists01.pubmisc.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com (lists01.pubmisc.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.19.33]) by colo-mx.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B29AF285; Tue, 9 Jan 2018 22:46:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.12]) by lists01.pubmisc.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id w09MjcOv023760 for ; Tue, 9 Jan 2018 17:45:38 -0500 Received: by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) id D340716914; Tue, 9 Jan 2018 22:45:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mamuti.net (ovpn-204-169.brq.redhat.com [10.40.204.169]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A230F183A7 for ; Tue, 9 Jan 2018 22:45:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mamuti.net (Postfix, from userid 500) id 75E331093E7; Tue, 9 Jan 2018 23:45:31 +0100 (CET) From: Jiri Denemark To: libvir-list@redhat.com Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2018 23:45:25 +0100 Message-Id: In-Reply-To: References: In-Reply-To: References: Mail-Followup-To: libvir-list@redhat.com X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.12 X-loop: libvir-list@redhat.com Subject: [libvirt] [PATCH 12/17] cpu: Add Haswell-IBRS CPU model X-BeenThere: libvir-list@redhat.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: junk List-Id: Development discussions about the libvirt library & tools List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Sender: libvir-list-bounces@redhat.com Errors-To: libvir-list-bounces@redhat.com X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.13 X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.32]); Tue, 09 Jan 2018 22:46:12 +0000 (UTC) X-ZohoMail: RSF_0 Z_629925259 SPT_0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" This is a variant of Haswell with indirect branch prediction protection. The only difference between Haswell and Haswell-IBRS is the added "spec-ctrl" feature. The Haswell-IBRS model in QEMU is a bit different since Haswell got several additional features since we added it in cpu_map.xml: arat, abm, f16c, rdrand, vme, xsaveopt Adding them only to the -IBRS variant would confuse our CPU detection code. Signed-off-by: Jiri Denemark --- src/cpu/cpu_map.xml | 56 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++= ++++ 1 file changed, 56 insertions(+) diff --git a/src/cpu/cpu_map.xml b/src/cpu/cpu_map.xml index 6d4b31c507..3b1d484bd5 100644 --- a/src/cpu/cpu_map.xml +++ b/src/cpu/cpu_map.xml @@ -1335,6 +1335,62 @@ =20 + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + --=20 2.15.1 -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list