hw/rdma/vmw/pvrdma_main.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
---
hw/rdma/vmw/pvrdma_main.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/hw/rdma/vmw/pvrdma_main.c b/hw/rdma/vmw/pvrdma_main.c
index 84ae8024fc..e229c19564 100644
--- a/hw/rdma/vmw/pvrdma_main.c
+++ b/hw/rdma/vmw/pvrdma_main.c
@@ -427,7 +427,7 @@ static void pvrdma_regs_write(void *opaque, hwaddr addr, uint64_t val,
case PVRDMA_REG_REQUEST:
if (val == 0) {
trace_pvrdma_regs_write(addr, val, "REQUEST", "");
- pvrdma_exec_cmd(dev);
+ pvrdma_exec_cmd(dev); // this is a test comment
}
break;
default:
--
2.31.1
On Fri, Jun 11, 2021 at 6:43 PM Mauro Matteo Cascella <mcascell@redhat.com> wrote: > > --- > hw/rdma/vmw/pvrdma_main.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/hw/rdma/vmw/pvrdma_main.c b/hw/rdma/vmw/pvrdma_main.c > index 84ae8024fc..e229c19564 100644 > --- a/hw/rdma/vmw/pvrdma_main.c > +++ b/hw/rdma/vmw/pvrdma_main.c > @@ -427,7 +427,7 @@ static void pvrdma_regs_write(void *opaque, hwaddr addr, uint64_t val, > case PVRDMA_REG_REQUEST: > if (val == 0) { > trace_pvrdma_regs_write(addr, val, "REQUEST", ""); > - pvrdma_exec_cmd(dev); > + pvrdma_exec_cmd(dev); // this is a test comment > } > break; > default: > -- > 2.31.1 > Again, sorry for the spam. Can someone please explain how to *not* use the profiles defined in .gitpublish? I used the following command, evidently with no success: $ git publish --override-cc --override-to --to=mcascell@redhat.com -- Mauro Matteo Cascella Red Hat Product Security PGP-Key ID: BB3410B0
Patchew URL: https://patchew.org/QEMU/20210611164305.440633-1-mcascell@redhat.com/ Hi, This series seems to have some coding style problems. See output below for more information: Type: series Message-id: 20210611164305.440633-1-mcascell@redhat.com Subject: [PATCH v2] Test comment for git-publish === TEST SCRIPT BEGIN === #!/bin/bash git rev-parse base > /dev/null || exit 0 git config --local diff.renamelimit 0 git config --local diff.renames True git config --local diff.algorithm histogram ./scripts/checkpatch.pl --mailback base.. === TEST SCRIPT END === Updating 3c8cf5a9c21ff8782164d1def7f44bd888713384 Switched to a new branch 'test' bf784f4 Test comment for git-publish === OUTPUT BEGIN === ERROR: do not use C99 // comments #21: FILE: hw/rdma/vmw/pvrdma_main.c:430: + pvrdma_exec_cmd(dev); // this is a test comment ERROR: Missing Signed-off-by: line(s) total: 2 errors, 0 warnings, 8 lines checked Commit bf784f48ac5f (Test comment for git-publish) has style problems, please review. If any of these errors are false positives report them to the maintainer, see CHECKPATCH in MAINTAINERS. === OUTPUT END === Test command exited with code: 1 The full log is available at http://patchew.org/logs/20210611164305.440633-1-mcascell@redhat.com/testing.checkpatch/?type=message. --- Email generated automatically by Patchew [https://patchew.org/]. Please send your feedback to patchew-devel@redhat.com
© 2016 - 2024 Red Hat, Inc.