[PATCH] target/arm: Make number of counters in PMCR follow the CPU

Peter Maydell posted 1 patch 1 year, 11 months ago
target/arm/cpu.h       |  1 +
target/arm/internals.h |  4 +++-
target/arm/cpu64.c     | 10 ++++++++++
target/arm/cpu_tcg.c   |  6 ++++++
target/arm/helper.c    | 25 ++++++++++++++-----------
target/arm/kvm64.c     | 12 ++++++++++++
6 files changed, 46 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
[PATCH] target/arm: Make number of counters in PMCR follow the CPU
Posted by Peter Maydell 1 year, 11 months ago
Currently we give all the v7-and-up CPUs a PMU with 4 counters.  This
means that we don't provide the 6 counters that are required by the
Arm BSA (Base System Architecture) specification if the CPU supports
the Virtualization extensions.

Instead of having a single PMCR_NUM_COUNTERS, make each CPU type
specify the PMCR reset value (obtained from the appropriate TRM), and
use the 'N' field of that value to define the number of counters
provided.

This means that we now supply 6 counters instead of 4 for:
 Cortex-A9, Cortex-A15, Cortex-A53, Cortex-A57, Cortex-A72,
 Cortex-A76, Neoverse-N1, '-cpu max'
These CPUs remain with 4 counters:
 Cortex-A7, Cortex-A8
This CPU goes down from 4 to 3 counters:
 Cortex-R5

TODO: A64FX -- I don't know the correct PMCR_EL0 reset value.

Note that because we now use the PMCR reset value of the specific
implementation, we no longer set the LC bit out of reset.  This has
an UNKNOWN value out of reset for all cores with any AArch32 support,
so guest software should be setting it anyway if it wants it.

This change was originally landed in commit f7fb73b8cdd3f7 (during
the 6.0 release cycle) but was then reverted by commit
21c2dd77a6aa517 before that release because it did not work with KVM.
This version fixes that by creating the scratch vCPU in
kvm_arm_get_host_cpu_features() with the KVM_ARM_VCPU_PMU_V3 feature
if KVM supports it, and then only asking KVM for the PMCR_EL0 value
if the vCPU has a PMU.

Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
---
I'd forgotten that we'd dropped this fix in the 6.0 timeframe
and never picked it back up again until Alex reminded me of it...

Changes since original attempt:
 -- rebased
 -- fix the code in kvm_arm_get_host_cpu_features() that reads PMCR_EL0
 -- set PMCR value for new CPUs cortex-a76, neoverse-n1
 -- set PMCR value for now-separated-out aarch32 -cpu max
 -- TODO comment for a64fx

Shuuichirou, Itaru: this is another patch where we need to know
an A64FX register value...
---
 target/arm/cpu.h       |  1 +
 target/arm/internals.h |  4 +++-
 target/arm/cpu64.c     | 10 ++++++++++
 target/arm/cpu_tcg.c   |  6 ++++++
 target/arm/helper.c    | 25 ++++++++++++++-----------
 target/arm/kvm64.c     | 12 ++++++++++++
 6 files changed, 46 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

diff --git a/target/arm/cpu.h b/target/arm/cpu.h
index 18ca61e8e25..0551be62e88 100644
--- a/target/arm/cpu.h
+++ b/target/arm/cpu.h
@@ -965,6 +965,7 @@ struct ArchCPU {
         uint64_t id_aa64dfr0;
         uint64_t id_aa64dfr1;
         uint64_t id_aa64zfr0;
+        uint64_t reset_pmcr_el0;
     } isar;
     uint64_t midr;
     uint32_t revidr;
diff --git a/target/arm/internals.h b/target/arm/internals.h
index 6ca0e957468..b3b7737048b 100644
--- a/target/arm/internals.h
+++ b/target/arm/internals.h
@@ -1299,7 +1299,9 @@ enum MVEECIState {
 
 static inline uint32_t pmu_num_counters(CPUARMState *env)
 {
-  return (env->cp15.c9_pmcr & PMCRN_MASK) >> PMCRN_SHIFT;
+    ARMCPU *cpu = env_archcpu(env);
+
+    return (cpu->isar.reset_pmcr_el0 & PMCRN_MASK) >> PMCRN_SHIFT;
 }
 
 /* Bits allowed to be set/cleared for PMCNTEN* and PMINTEN* */
diff --git a/target/arm/cpu64.c b/target/arm/cpu64.c
index 04427e073f1..6008efcbbf0 100644
--- a/target/arm/cpu64.c
+++ b/target/arm/cpu64.c
@@ -79,6 +79,7 @@ static void aarch64_a57_initfn(Object *obj)
     cpu->isar.id_aa64isar0 = 0x00011120;
     cpu->isar.id_aa64mmfr0 = 0x00001124;
     cpu->isar.dbgdidr = 0x3516d000;
+    cpu->isar.reset_pmcr_el0 = 0x41013000;
     cpu->clidr = 0x0a200023;
     cpu->ccsidr[0] = 0x701fe00a; /* 32KB L1 dcache */
     cpu->ccsidr[1] = 0x201fe012; /* 48KB L1 icache */
@@ -132,6 +133,7 @@ static void aarch64_a53_initfn(Object *obj)
     cpu->isar.id_aa64isar0 = 0x00011120;
     cpu->isar.id_aa64mmfr0 = 0x00001122; /* 40 bit physical addr */
     cpu->isar.dbgdidr = 0x3516d000;
+    cpu->isar.reset_pmcr_el0 = 0x41033000;
     cpu->clidr = 0x0a200023;
     cpu->ccsidr[0] = 0x700fe01a; /* 32KB L1 dcache */
     cpu->ccsidr[1] = 0x201fe00a; /* 32KB L1 icache */
@@ -183,6 +185,7 @@ static void aarch64_a72_initfn(Object *obj)
     cpu->isar.id_aa64isar0 = 0x00011120;
     cpu->isar.id_aa64mmfr0 = 0x00001124;
     cpu->isar.dbgdidr = 0x3516d000;
+    cpu->isar.reset_pmcr_el0 = 0x41023000;
     cpu->clidr = 0x0a200023;
     cpu->ccsidr[0] = 0x701fe00a; /* 32KB L1 dcache */
     cpu->ccsidr[1] = 0x201fe012; /* 48KB L1 icache */
@@ -257,6 +260,9 @@ static void aarch64_a76_initfn(Object *obj)
     cpu->isar.mvfr0 = 0x10110222;
     cpu->isar.mvfr1 = 0x13211111;
     cpu->isar.mvfr2 = 0x00000043;
+
+    /* From D5.1 AArch64 PMU register summary */
+    cpu->isar.reset_pmcr_el0 = 0x410b3000;
 }
 
 static void aarch64_neoverse_n1_initfn(Object *obj)
@@ -322,6 +328,9 @@ static void aarch64_neoverse_n1_initfn(Object *obj)
     cpu->isar.mvfr0 = 0x10110222;
     cpu->isar.mvfr1 = 0x13211111;
     cpu->isar.mvfr2 = 0x00000043;
+
+    /* From D5.1 AArch64 PMU register summary */
+    cpu->isar.reset_pmcr_el0 = 0x410c3000;
 }
 
 void arm_cpu_sve_finalize(ARMCPU *cpu, Error **errp)
@@ -1005,6 +1014,7 @@ static void aarch64_a64fx_initfn(Object *obj)
     set_bit(3, cpu->sve_vq_supported); /* 512bit */
 
     /* TODO:  Add A64FX specific HPC extension registers */
+// FIXME reset_pmcr_el0
 }
 
 static const ARMCPUInfo aarch64_cpus[] = {
diff --git a/target/arm/cpu_tcg.c b/target/arm/cpu_tcg.c
index ea4eccddc35..b751a19c8a7 100644
--- a/target/arm/cpu_tcg.c
+++ b/target/arm/cpu_tcg.c
@@ -425,6 +425,7 @@ static void cortex_a8_initfn(Object *obj)
     cpu->ccsidr[1] = 0x2007e01a; /* 16k L1 icache. */
     cpu->ccsidr[2] = 0xf0000000; /* No L2 icache. */
     cpu->reset_auxcr = 2;
+    cpu->isar.reset_pmcr_el0 = 0x41002000;
     define_arm_cp_regs(cpu, cortexa8_cp_reginfo);
 }
 
@@ -496,6 +497,7 @@ static void cortex_a9_initfn(Object *obj)
     cpu->clidr = (1 << 27) | (1 << 24) | 3;
     cpu->ccsidr[0] = 0xe00fe019; /* 16k L1 dcache. */
     cpu->ccsidr[1] = 0x200fe019; /* 16k L1 icache. */
+    cpu->isar.reset_pmcr_el0 = 0x41093000;
     define_arm_cp_regs(cpu, cortexa9_cp_reginfo);
 }
 
@@ -565,6 +567,7 @@ static void cortex_a7_initfn(Object *obj)
     cpu->ccsidr[0] = 0x701fe00a; /* 32K L1 dcache */
     cpu->ccsidr[1] = 0x201fe00a; /* 32K L1 icache */
     cpu->ccsidr[2] = 0x711fe07a; /* 4096K L2 unified cache */
+    cpu->isar.reset_pmcr_el0 = 0x41072000;
     define_arm_cp_regs(cpu, cortexa15_cp_reginfo); /* Same as A15 */
 }
 
@@ -607,6 +610,7 @@ static void cortex_a15_initfn(Object *obj)
     cpu->ccsidr[0] = 0x701fe00a; /* 32K L1 dcache */
     cpu->ccsidr[1] = 0x201fe00a; /* 32K L1 icache */
     cpu->ccsidr[2] = 0x711fe07a; /* 4096K L2 unified cache */
+    cpu->isar.reset_pmcr_el0 = 0x410F3000;
     define_arm_cp_regs(cpu, cortexa15_cp_reginfo);
 }
 
@@ -835,6 +839,7 @@ static void cortex_r5_initfn(Object *obj)
     cpu->isar.id_isar6 = 0x0;
     cpu->mp_is_up = true;
     cpu->pmsav7_dregion = 16;
+    cpu->isar.reset_pmcr_el0 = 0x41151800;
     define_arm_cp_regs(cpu, cortexr5_cp_reginfo);
 }
 
@@ -1093,6 +1098,7 @@ static void arm_max_initfn(Object *obj)
     cpu->isar.id_isar5 = 0x00011121;
     cpu->isar.id_isar6 = 0;
     cpu->isar.dbgdidr = 0x3516d000;
+    cpu->isar.reset_pmcr_el0 = 0x41013000;
     cpu->clidr = 0x0a200023;
     cpu->ccsidr[0] = 0x701fe00a; /* 32KB L1 dcache */
     cpu->ccsidr[1] = 0x201fe012; /* 48KB L1 icache */
diff --git a/target/arm/helper.c b/target/arm/helper.c
index 432bd819195..439220e4574 100644
--- a/target/arm/helper.c
+++ b/target/arm/helper.c
@@ -39,7 +39,6 @@
 #include "cpregs.h"
 
 #define ARM_CPU_FREQ 1000000000 /* FIXME: 1 GHz, should be configurable */
-#define PMCR_NUM_COUNTERS 4 /* QEMU IMPDEF choice */
 
 #ifndef CONFIG_USER_ONLY
 
@@ -5533,13 +5532,6 @@ static const ARMCPRegInfo el2_cp_reginfo[] = {
       .resetvalue = 0,
       .writefn = gt_hyp_ctl_write, .raw_writefn = raw_write },
 #endif
-    /* The only field of MDCR_EL2 that has a defined architectural reset value
-     * is MDCR_EL2.HPMN which should reset to the value of PMCR_EL0.N.
-     */
-    { .name = "MDCR_EL2", .state = ARM_CP_STATE_BOTH,
-      .opc0 = 3, .opc1 = 4, .crn = 1, .crm = 1, .opc2 = 1,
-      .access = PL2_RW, .resetvalue = PMCR_NUM_COUNTERS,
-      .fieldoffset = offsetof(CPUARMState, cp15.mdcr_el2), },
     { .name = "HPFAR", .state = ARM_CP_STATE_AA32,
       .cp = 15, .opc1 = 4, .crn = 6, .crm = 0, .opc2 = 4,
       .access = PL2_RW, .accessfn = access_el3_aa32ns,
@@ -6586,7 +6578,7 @@ static void define_pmu_regs(ARMCPU *cpu)
      * field as main ID register, and we implement four counters in
      * addition to the cycle count register.
      */
-    unsigned int i, pmcrn = PMCR_NUM_COUNTERS;
+    unsigned int i, pmcrn = pmu_num_counters(&cpu->env);
     ARMCPRegInfo pmcr = {
         .name = "PMCR", .cp = 15, .crn = 9, .crm = 12, .opc1 = 0, .opc2 = 0,
         .access = PL0_RW,
@@ -6601,10 +6593,10 @@ static void define_pmu_regs(ARMCPU *cpu)
         .access = PL0_RW, .accessfn = pmreg_access,
         .type = ARM_CP_IO,
         .fieldoffset = offsetof(CPUARMState, cp15.c9_pmcr),
-        .resetvalue = (cpu->midr & 0xff000000) | (pmcrn << PMCRN_SHIFT) |
-                      PMCRLC,
+        .resetvalue = cpu->isar.reset_pmcr_el0,
         .writefn = pmcr_write, .raw_writefn = raw_write,
     };
+
     define_one_arm_cp_reg(cpu, &pmcr);
     define_one_arm_cp_reg(cpu, &pmcr64);
     for (i = 0; i < pmcrn; i++) {
@@ -7961,6 +7953,17 @@ void register_cp_regs_for_features(ARMCPU *cpu)
               .type = ARM_CP_EL3_NO_EL2_C_NZ,
               .fieldoffset = offsetof(CPUARMState, cp15.vmpidr_el2) },
         };
+        /*
+         * The only field of MDCR_EL2 that has a defined architectural reset
+         * value is MDCR_EL2.HPMN which should reset to the value of PMCR_EL0.N.
+         */
+        ARMCPRegInfo mdcr_el2 = {
+            .name = "MDCR_EL2", .state = ARM_CP_STATE_BOTH,
+            .opc0 = 3, .opc1 = 4, .crn = 1, .crm = 1, .opc2 = 1,
+            .access = PL2_RW, .resetvalue = pmu_num_counters(env),
+            .fieldoffset = offsetof(CPUARMState, cp15.mdcr_el2),
+        };
+        define_one_arm_cp_reg(cpu, &mdcr_el2);
         define_arm_cp_regs(cpu, vpidr_regs);
         define_arm_cp_regs(cpu, el2_cp_reginfo);
         if (arm_feature(env, ARM_FEATURE_V8)) {
diff --git a/target/arm/kvm64.c b/target/arm/kvm64.c
index b8cfaf5782a..363032da903 100644
--- a/target/arm/kvm64.c
+++ b/target/arm/kvm64.c
@@ -505,6 +505,7 @@ bool kvm_arm_get_host_cpu_features(ARMHostCPUFeatures *ahcf)
      */
     int fdarray[3];
     bool sve_supported;
+    bool pmu_supported = false;
     uint64_t features = 0;
     uint64_t t;
     int err;
@@ -537,6 +538,11 @@ bool kvm_arm_get_host_cpu_features(ARMHostCPUFeatures *ahcf)
                              1 << KVM_ARM_VCPU_PTRAUTH_GENERIC);
     }
 
+    if (kvm_arm_pmu_supported()) {
+        init.features[0] |= 1 << KVM_ARM_VCPU_PMU_V3;
+        pmu_supported = true;
+    }
+
     if (!kvm_arm_create_scratch_host_vcpu(cpus_to_try, fdarray, &init)) {
         return false;
     }
@@ -659,6 +665,12 @@ bool kvm_arm_get_host_cpu_features(ARMHostCPUFeatures *ahcf)
             dbgdidr |= (1 << 15); /* RES1 bit */
             ahcf->isar.dbgdidr = dbgdidr;
         }
+
+        if (pmu_supported) {
+            /* PMCR_EL0 is only accessible if the vCPU has feature PMU_V3 */
+            err |= read_sys_reg64(fdarray[2], &ahcf->isar.reset_pmcr_el0,
+                                  ARM64_SYS_REG(3, 3, 9, 12, 0));
+        }
     }
 
     sve_supported = ioctl(fdarray[0], KVM_CHECK_EXTENSION, KVM_CAP_ARM_SVE) > 0;
-- 
2.25.1
RE: [PATCH] target/arm: Make number of counters in PMCR follow the CPU
Posted by ishii.shuuichir@fujitsu.com 1 year, 11 months ago
Hi, Peter.

> Shuuichirou, Itaru: this is another patch where we need to know
> an A64FX register value...

Sorry for the late reply.

The initial value of the pmcr_el0 register in A64FX is 0x46014040.

After applying this Peter's patch, should we submit a new patch as a64fx patch from us?
or do you want to fix your own modifications to the patch that peter has posted?
Which is the best procedure?

Best regards,
Shuuichirou.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
> Sent: Friday, May 13, 2022 9:29 PM
> To: qemu-arm@nongnu.org; qemu-devel@nongnu.org
> Cc: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org>; Ishii, Shuuichirou/石井 周一郎
> <ishii.shuuichir@fujitsu.com>; Itaru Kitayama <itaru.kitayama@gmail.com>
> Subject: [PATCH] target/arm: Make number of counters in PMCR follow the CPU
> 
> Currently we give all the v7-and-up CPUs a PMU with 4 counters.  This
> means that we don't provide the 6 counters that are required by the
> Arm BSA (Base System Architecture) specification if the CPU supports
> the Virtualization extensions.
> 
> Instead of having a single PMCR_NUM_COUNTERS, make each CPU type
> specify the PMCR reset value (obtained from the appropriate TRM), and
> use the 'N' field of that value to define the number of counters
> provided.
> 
> This means that we now supply 6 counters instead of 4 for:
>  Cortex-A9, Cortex-A15, Cortex-A53, Cortex-A57, Cortex-A72,
>  Cortex-A76, Neoverse-N1, '-cpu max'
> These CPUs remain with 4 counters:
>  Cortex-A7, Cortex-A8
> This CPU goes down from 4 to 3 counters:
>  Cortex-R5
> 
> TODO: A64FX -- I don't know the correct PMCR_EL0 reset value.
> 
> Note that because we now use the PMCR reset value of the specific
> implementation, we no longer set the LC bit out of reset.  This has
> an UNKNOWN value out of reset for all cores with any AArch32 support,
> so guest software should be setting it anyway if it wants it.
> 
> This change was originally landed in commit f7fb73b8cdd3f7 (during
> the 6.0 release cycle) but was then reverted by commit
> 21c2dd77a6aa517 before that release because it did not work with KVM.
> This version fixes that by creating the scratch vCPU in
> kvm_arm_get_host_cpu_features() with the KVM_ARM_VCPU_PMU_V3 feature
> if KVM supports it, and then only asking KVM for the PMCR_EL0 value
> if the vCPU has a PMU.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
> ---
> I'd forgotten that we'd dropped this fix in the 6.0 timeframe
> and never picked it back up again until Alex reminded me of it...
> 
> Changes since original attempt:
>  -- rebased
>  -- fix the code in kvm_arm_get_host_cpu_features() that reads PMCR_EL0
>  -- set PMCR value for new CPUs cortex-a76, neoverse-n1
>  -- set PMCR value for now-separated-out aarch32 -cpu max
>  -- TODO comment for a64fx
> 
> Shuuichirou, Itaru: this is another patch where we need to know
> an A64FX register value...
> ---
>  target/arm/cpu.h       |  1 +
>  target/arm/internals.h |  4 +++-
>  target/arm/cpu64.c     | 10 ++++++++++
>  target/arm/cpu_tcg.c   |  6 ++++++
>  target/arm/helper.c    | 25 ++++++++++++++-----------
>  target/arm/kvm64.c     | 12 ++++++++++++
>  6 files changed, 46 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/target/arm/cpu.h b/target/arm/cpu.h
> index 18ca61e8e25..0551be62e88 100644
> --- a/target/arm/cpu.h
> +++ b/target/arm/cpu.h
> @@ -965,6 +965,7 @@ struct ArchCPU {
>          uint64_t id_aa64dfr0;
>          uint64_t id_aa64dfr1;
>          uint64_t id_aa64zfr0;
> +        uint64_t reset_pmcr_el0;
>      } isar;
>      uint64_t midr;
>      uint32_t revidr;
> diff --git a/target/arm/internals.h b/target/arm/internals.h
> index 6ca0e957468..b3b7737048b 100644
> --- a/target/arm/internals.h
> +++ b/target/arm/internals.h
> @@ -1299,7 +1299,9 @@ enum MVEECIState {
> 
>  static inline uint32_t pmu_num_counters(CPUARMState *env)
>  {
> -  return (env->cp15.c9_pmcr & PMCRN_MASK) >> PMCRN_SHIFT;
> +    ARMCPU *cpu = env_archcpu(env);
> +
> +    return (cpu->isar.reset_pmcr_el0 & PMCRN_MASK) >> PMCRN_SHIFT;
>  }
> 
>  /* Bits allowed to be set/cleared for PMCNTEN* and PMINTEN* */
> diff --git a/target/arm/cpu64.c b/target/arm/cpu64.c
> index 04427e073f1..6008efcbbf0 100644
> --- a/target/arm/cpu64.c
> +++ b/target/arm/cpu64.c
> @@ -79,6 +79,7 @@ static void aarch64_a57_initfn(Object *obj)
>      cpu->isar.id_aa64isar0 = 0x00011120;
>      cpu->isar.id_aa64mmfr0 = 0x00001124;
>      cpu->isar.dbgdidr = 0x3516d000;
> +    cpu->isar.reset_pmcr_el0 = 0x41013000;
>      cpu->clidr = 0x0a200023;
>      cpu->ccsidr[0] = 0x701fe00a; /* 32KB L1 dcache */
>      cpu->ccsidr[1] = 0x201fe012; /* 48KB L1 icache */
> @@ -132,6 +133,7 @@ static void aarch64_a53_initfn(Object *obj)
>      cpu->isar.id_aa64isar0 = 0x00011120;
>      cpu->isar.id_aa64mmfr0 = 0x00001122; /* 40 bit physical addr */
>      cpu->isar.dbgdidr = 0x3516d000;
> +    cpu->isar.reset_pmcr_el0 = 0x41033000;
>      cpu->clidr = 0x0a200023;
>      cpu->ccsidr[0] = 0x700fe01a; /* 32KB L1 dcache */
>      cpu->ccsidr[1] = 0x201fe00a; /* 32KB L1 icache */
> @@ -183,6 +185,7 @@ static void aarch64_a72_initfn(Object *obj)
>      cpu->isar.id_aa64isar0 = 0x00011120;
>      cpu->isar.id_aa64mmfr0 = 0x00001124;
>      cpu->isar.dbgdidr = 0x3516d000;
> +    cpu->isar.reset_pmcr_el0 = 0x41023000;
>      cpu->clidr = 0x0a200023;
>      cpu->ccsidr[0] = 0x701fe00a; /* 32KB L1 dcache */
>      cpu->ccsidr[1] = 0x201fe012; /* 48KB L1 icache */
> @@ -257,6 +260,9 @@ static void aarch64_a76_initfn(Object *obj)
>      cpu->isar.mvfr0 = 0x10110222;
>      cpu->isar.mvfr1 = 0x13211111;
>      cpu->isar.mvfr2 = 0x00000043;
> +
> +    /* From D5.1 AArch64 PMU register summary */
> +    cpu->isar.reset_pmcr_el0 = 0x410b3000;
>  }
> 
>  static void aarch64_neoverse_n1_initfn(Object *obj)
> @@ -322,6 +328,9 @@ static void aarch64_neoverse_n1_initfn(Object *obj)
>      cpu->isar.mvfr0 = 0x10110222;
>      cpu->isar.mvfr1 = 0x13211111;
>      cpu->isar.mvfr2 = 0x00000043;
> +
> +    /* From D5.1 AArch64 PMU register summary */
> +    cpu->isar.reset_pmcr_el0 = 0x410c3000;
>  }
> 
>  void arm_cpu_sve_finalize(ARMCPU *cpu, Error **errp)
> @@ -1005,6 +1014,7 @@ static void aarch64_a64fx_initfn(Object *obj)
>      set_bit(3, cpu->sve_vq_supported); /* 512bit */
> 
>      /* TODO:  Add A64FX specific HPC extension registers */
> +// FIXME reset_pmcr_el0
>  }
> 
>  static const ARMCPUInfo aarch64_cpus[] = {
> diff --git a/target/arm/cpu_tcg.c b/target/arm/cpu_tcg.c
> index ea4eccddc35..b751a19c8a7 100644
> --- a/target/arm/cpu_tcg.c
> +++ b/target/arm/cpu_tcg.c
> @@ -425,6 +425,7 @@ static void cortex_a8_initfn(Object *obj)
>      cpu->ccsidr[1] = 0x2007e01a; /* 16k L1 icache. */
>      cpu->ccsidr[2] = 0xf0000000; /* No L2 icache. */
>      cpu->reset_auxcr = 2;
> +    cpu->isar.reset_pmcr_el0 = 0x41002000;
>      define_arm_cp_regs(cpu, cortexa8_cp_reginfo);
>  }
> 
> @@ -496,6 +497,7 @@ static void cortex_a9_initfn(Object *obj)
>      cpu->clidr = (1 << 27) | (1 << 24) | 3;
>      cpu->ccsidr[0] = 0xe00fe019; /* 16k L1 dcache. */
>      cpu->ccsidr[1] = 0x200fe019; /* 16k L1 icache. */
> +    cpu->isar.reset_pmcr_el0 = 0x41093000;
>      define_arm_cp_regs(cpu, cortexa9_cp_reginfo);
>  }
> 
> @@ -565,6 +567,7 @@ static void cortex_a7_initfn(Object *obj)
>      cpu->ccsidr[0] = 0x701fe00a; /* 32K L1 dcache */
>      cpu->ccsidr[1] = 0x201fe00a; /* 32K L1 icache */
>      cpu->ccsidr[2] = 0x711fe07a; /* 4096K L2 unified cache */
> +    cpu->isar.reset_pmcr_el0 = 0x41072000;
>      define_arm_cp_regs(cpu, cortexa15_cp_reginfo); /* Same as A15 */
>  }
> 
> @@ -607,6 +610,7 @@ static void cortex_a15_initfn(Object *obj)
>      cpu->ccsidr[0] = 0x701fe00a; /* 32K L1 dcache */
>      cpu->ccsidr[1] = 0x201fe00a; /* 32K L1 icache */
>      cpu->ccsidr[2] = 0x711fe07a; /* 4096K L2 unified cache */
> +    cpu->isar.reset_pmcr_el0 = 0x410F3000;
>      define_arm_cp_regs(cpu, cortexa15_cp_reginfo);
>  }
> 
> @@ -835,6 +839,7 @@ static void cortex_r5_initfn(Object *obj)
>      cpu->isar.id_isar6 = 0x0;
>      cpu->mp_is_up = true;
>      cpu->pmsav7_dregion = 16;
> +    cpu->isar.reset_pmcr_el0 = 0x41151800;
>      define_arm_cp_regs(cpu, cortexr5_cp_reginfo);
>  }
> 
> @@ -1093,6 +1098,7 @@ static void arm_max_initfn(Object *obj)
>      cpu->isar.id_isar5 = 0x00011121;
>      cpu->isar.id_isar6 = 0;
>      cpu->isar.dbgdidr = 0x3516d000;
> +    cpu->isar.reset_pmcr_el0 = 0x41013000;
>      cpu->clidr = 0x0a200023;
>      cpu->ccsidr[0] = 0x701fe00a; /* 32KB L1 dcache */
>      cpu->ccsidr[1] = 0x201fe012; /* 48KB L1 icache */
> diff --git a/target/arm/helper.c b/target/arm/helper.c
> index 432bd819195..439220e4574 100644
> --- a/target/arm/helper.c
> +++ b/target/arm/helper.c
> @@ -39,7 +39,6 @@
>  #include "cpregs.h"
> 
>  #define ARM_CPU_FREQ 1000000000 /* FIXME: 1 GHz, should be configurable
> */
> -#define PMCR_NUM_COUNTERS 4 /* QEMU IMPDEF choice */
> 
>  #ifndef CONFIG_USER_ONLY
> 
> @@ -5533,13 +5532,6 @@ static const ARMCPRegInfo el2_cp_reginfo[] = {
>        .resetvalue = 0,
>        .writefn = gt_hyp_ctl_write, .raw_writefn = raw_write },
>  #endif
> -    /* The only field of MDCR_EL2 that has a defined architectural reset value
> -     * is MDCR_EL2.HPMN which should reset to the value of PMCR_EL0.N.
> -     */
> -    { .name = "MDCR_EL2", .state = ARM_CP_STATE_BOTH,
> -      .opc0 = 3, .opc1 = 4, .crn = 1, .crm = 1, .opc2 = 1,
> -      .access = PL2_RW, .resetvalue = PMCR_NUM_COUNTERS,
> -      .fieldoffset = offsetof(CPUARMState, cp15.mdcr_el2), },
>      { .name = "HPFAR", .state = ARM_CP_STATE_AA32,
>        .cp = 15, .opc1 = 4, .crn = 6, .crm = 0, .opc2 = 4,
>        .access = PL2_RW, .accessfn = access_el3_aa32ns,
> @@ -6586,7 +6578,7 @@ static void define_pmu_regs(ARMCPU *cpu)
>       * field as main ID register, and we implement four counters in
>       * addition to the cycle count register.
>       */
> -    unsigned int i, pmcrn = PMCR_NUM_COUNTERS;
> +    unsigned int i, pmcrn = pmu_num_counters(&cpu->env);
>      ARMCPRegInfo pmcr = {
>          .name = "PMCR", .cp = 15, .crn = 9, .crm = 12, .opc1 = 0, .opc2 = 0,
>          .access = PL0_RW,
> @@ -6601,10 +6593,10 @@ static void define_pmu_regs(ARMCPU *cpu)
>          .access = PL0_RW, .accessfn = pmreg_access,
>          .type = ARM_CP_IO,
>          .fieldoffset = offsetof(CPUARMState, cp15.c9_pmcr),
> -        .resetvalue = (cpu->midr & 0xff000000) | (pmcrn << PMCRN_SHIFT) |
> -                      PMCRLC,
> +        .resetvalue = cpu->isar.reset_pmcr_el0,
>          .writefn = pmcr_write, .raw_writefn = raw_write,
>      };
> +
>      define_one_arm_cp_reg(cpu, &pmcr);
>      define_one_arm_cp_reg(cpu, &pmcr64);
>      for (i = 0; i < pmcrn; i++) {
> @@ -7961,6 +7953,17 @@ void register_cp_regs_for_features(ARMCPU *cpu)
>                .type = ARM_CP_EL3_NO_EL2_C_NZ,
>                .fieldoffset = offsetof(CPUARMState, cp15.vmpidr_el2) },
>          };
> +        /*
> +         * The only field of MDCR_EL2 that has a defined architectural reset
> +         * value is MDCR_EL2.HPMN which should reset to the value of
> PMCR_EL0.N.
> +         */
> +        ARMCPRegInfo mdcr_el2 = {
> +            .name = "MDCR_EL2", .state = ARM_CP_STATE_BOTH,
> +            .opc0 = 3, .opc1 = 4, .crn = 1, .crm = 1, .opc2 = 1,
> +            .access = PL2_RW, .resetvalue = pmu_num_counters(env),
> +            .fieldoffset = offsetof(CPUARMState, cp15.mdcr_el2),
> +        };
> +        define_one_arm_cp_reg(cpu, &mdcr_el2);
>          define_arm_cp_regs(cpu, vpidr_regs);
>          define_arm_cp_regs(cpu, el2_cp_reginfo);
>          if (arm_feature(env, ARM_FEATURE_V8)) {
> diff --git a/target/arm/kvm64.c b/target/arm/kvm64.c
> index b8cfaf5782a..363032da903 100644
> --- a/target/arm/kvm64.c
> +++ b/target/arm/kvm64.c
> @@ -505,6 +505,7 @@ bool
> kvm_arm_get_host_cpu_features(ARMHostCPUFeatures *ahcf)
>       */
>      int fdarray[3];
>      bool sve_supported;
> +    bool pmu_supported = false;
>      uint64_t features = 0;
>      uint64_t t;
>      int err;
> @@ -537,6 +538,11 @@ bool
> kvm_arm_get_host_cpu_features(ARMHostCPUFeatures *ahcf)
>                               1 << KVM_ARM_VCPU_PTRAUTH_GENERIC);
>      }
> 
> +    if (kvm_arm_pmu_supported()) {
> +        init.features[0] |= 1 << KVM_ARM_VCPU_PMU_V3;
> +        pmu_supported = true;
> +    }
> +
>      if (!kvm_arm_create_scratch_host_vcpu(cpus_to_try, fdarray, &init)) {
>          return false;
>      }
> @@ -659,6 +665,12 @@ bool
> kvm_arm_get_host_cpu_features(ARMHostCPUFeatures *ahcf)
>              dbgdidr |= (1 << 15); /* RES1 bit */
>              ahcf->isar.dbgdidr = dbgdidr;
>          }
> +
> +        if (pmu_supported) {
> +            /* PMCR_EL0 is only accessible if the vCPU has feature PMU_V3
> */
> +            err |= read_sys_reg64(fdarray[2], &ahcf->isar.reset_pmcr_el0,
> +                                  ARM64_SYS_REG(3, 3, 9, 12, 0));
> +        }
>      }
> 
>      sve_supported = ioctl(fdarray[0], KVM_CHECK_EXTENSION,
> KVM_CAP_ARM_SVE) > 0;
> --
> 2.25.1

Re: [PATCH] target/arm: Make number of counters in PMCR follow the CPU
Posted by Peter Maydell 1 year, 11 months ago
On Wed, 18 May 2022 at 00:24, ishii.shuuichir@fujitsu.com
<ishii.shuuichir@fujitsu.com> wrote:
>
> Hi, Peter.
>
> > Shuuichirou, Itaru: this is another patch where we need to know
> > an A64FX register value...
>
> Sorry for the late reply.
>
> The initial value of the pmcr_el0 register in A64FX is 0x46014040.
>
> After applying this Peter's patch, should we submit a new patch as a64fx patch from us?
> or do you want to fix your own modifications to the patch that peter has posted?
> Which is the best procedure?

Thanks for looking up the a64fx register value. You don't need to
do anything more -- I'll fix up the TODO comment and put the right
value into this patch, either when I post a v2 of it or else when
I apply it to target-arm.next.

-- PMM
RE: [PATCH] target/arm: Make number of counters in PMCR follow the CPU
Posted by ishii.shuuichir@fujitsu.com 1 year, 11 months ago
> Thanks for looking up the a64fx register value. You don't need to
> do anything more -- I'll fix up the TODO comment and put the right
> value into this patch, either when I post a v2 of it or else when
> I apply it to target-arm.next.

I understand.
Thank you in advance.

Shuuichirou.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
> Sent: Wednesday, May 18, 2022 7:31 PM
> To: Ishii, Shuuichirou/石井 周一郎 <ishii.shuuichir@fujitsu.com>
> Cc: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org>; Itaru Kitayama
> <itaru.kitayama@gmail.com>; qemu-arm@nongnu.org; qemu-devel@nongnu.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] target/arm: Make number of counters in PMCR follow the
> CPU
> 
> On Wed, 18 May 2022 at 00:24, ishii.shuuichir@fujitsu.com
> <ishii.shuuichir@fujitsu.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi, Peter.
> >
> > > Shuuichirou, Itaru: this is another patch where we need to know
> > > an A64FX register value...
> >
> > Sorry for the late reply.
> >
> > The initial value of the pmcr_el0 register in A64FX is 0x46014040.
> >
> > After applying this Peter's patch, should we submit a new patch as a64fx patch
> from us?
> > or do you want to fix your own modifications to the patch that peter has posted?
> > Which is the best procedure?
> 
> Thanks for looking up the a64fx register value. You don't need to
> do anything more -- I'll fix up the TODO comment and put the right
> value into this patch, either when I post a v2 of it or else when
> I apply it to target-arm.next.
> 
> -- PMM
Re: [PATCH] target/arm: Make number of counters in PMCR follow the CPU
Posted by Richard Henderson 1 year, 11 months ago
On 5/13/22 05:28, Peter Maydell wrote:
> Currently we give all the v7-and-up CPUs a PMU with 4 counters.  This
> means that we don't provide the 6 counters that are required by the
> Arm BSA (Base System Architecture) specification if the CPU supports
> the Virtualization extensions.
> 
> Instead of having a single PMCR_NUM_COUNTERS, make each CPU type
> specify the PMCR reset value (obtained from the appropriate TRM), and
> use the 'N' field of that value to define the number of counters
> provided.
> 
> This means that we now supply 6 counters instead of 4 for:
>   Cortex-A9, Cortex-A15, Cortex-A53, Cortex-A57, Cortex-A72,
>   Cortex-A76, Neoverse-N1, '-cpu max'
> These CPUs remain with 4 counters:
>   Cortex-A7, Cortex-A8
> This CPU goes down from 4 to 3 counters:
>   Cortex-R5
> 
> TODO: A64FX -- I don't know the correct PMCR_EL0 reset value.
> 
> Note that because we now use the PMCR reset value of the specific
> implementation, we no longer set the LC bit out of reset.  This has
> an UNKNOWN value out of reset for all cores with any AArch32 support,
> so guest software should be setting it anyway if it wants it.
> 
> This change was originally landed in commit f7fb73b8cdd3f7 (during
> the 6.0 release cycle) but was then reverted by commit
> 21c2dd77a6aa517 before that release because it did not work with KVM.
> This version fixes that by creating the scratch vCPU in
> kvm_arm_get_host_cpu_features() with the KVM_ARM_VCPU_PMU_V3 feature
> if KVM supports it, and then only asking KVM for the PMCR_EL0 value
> if the vCPU has a PMU.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell<peter.maydell@linaro.org>
> ---
> I'd forgotten that we'd dropped this fix in the 6.0 timeframe
> and never picked it back up again until Alex reminded me of it...
> 
> Changes since original attempt:
>   -- rebased
>   -- fix the code in kvm_arm_get_host_cpu_features() that reads PMCR_EL0
>   -- set PMCR value for new CPUs cortex-a76, neoverse-n1
>   -- set PMCR value for now-separated-out aarch32 -cpu max
>   -- TODO comment for a64fx
> 
> Shuuichirou, Itaru: this is another patch where we need to know
> an A64FX register value...
> ---

Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>

r~