[PATCH v2 1/5] tcg: Do not elide memory barriers for !CF_PARALLEL

Richard Henderson posted 5 patches 2 years, 4 months ago
There is a newer version of this series
[PATCH v2 1/5] tcg: Do not elide memory barriers for !CF_PARALLEL
Posted by Richard Henderson 2 years, 4 months ago
The virtio devices require proper memory ordering between
the vcpus and the iothreads.

Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
---
 tcg/tcg-op.c | 10 +++++++---
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tcg/tcg-op.c b/tcg/tcg-op.c
index 77658a88f0..75fdcdaac7 100644
--- a/tcg/tcg-op.c
+++ b/tcg/tcg-op.c
@@ -102,9 +102,13 @@ void tcg_gen_br(TCGLabel *l)
 
 void tcg_gen_mb(TCGBar mb_type)
 {
-    if (tcg_ctx->gen_tb->cflags & CF_PARALLEL) {
-        tcg_gen_op1(INDEX_op_mb, mb_type);
-    }
+    /*
+     * It is tempting to elide the barrier in a single-threaded context
+     * (i.e. !(cflags & CF_PARALLEL)), however, even with a single cpu
+     * we have i/o threads running in parallel, and lack of memory order
+     * can result in e.g. virtio queue entries being read incorrectly.
+     */
+    tcg_gen_op1(INDEX_op_mb, mb_type);
 }
 
 /* 32 bit ops */
-- 
2.34.1
Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] tcg: Do not elide memory barriers for !CF_PARALLEL
Posted by Philippe Mathieu-Daudé 2 years, 4 months ago
On 6/3/23 02:57, Richard Henderson wrote:
> The virtio devices require proper memory ordering between
> the vcpus and the iothreads.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
> ---
>   tcg/tcg-op.c | 10 +++++++---
>   1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org>