[PATCH v3] target/arm: Add Neoverse-N1 registers

Chen Baozi posted 1 patch 1 year, 1 month ago
There is a newer version of this series
target/arm/cpu64.c     |  2 ++
target/arm/cpu_tcg.c   | 66 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
target/arm/internals.h |  2 ++
3 files changed, 70 insertions(+)
[PATCH v3] target/arm: Add Neoverse-N1 registers
Posted by Chen Baozi 1 year, 1 month ago
Add implementation defined registers for neoverse-n1 which
would be accessed by TF-A. Since there is no DSU in Qemu,
CPUCFR_EL1.SCU bit is set to 1 to avoid DSU registers definition.

Signed-off-by: Chen Baozi <chenbaozi@phytium.com.cn>
Tested-by: Marcin Juszkiewicz <marcin.juszkiewicz@linaro.org>
---
 target/arm/cpu64.c     |  2 ++
 target/arm/cpu_tcg.c   | 66 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 target/arm/internals.h |  2 ++
 3 files changed, 70 insertions(+)

diff --git a/target/arm/cpu64.c b/target/arm/cpu64.c
index 4066950da1..a6ae7cafac 100644
--- a/target/arm/cpu64.c
+++ b/target/arm/cpu64.c
@@ -1094,6 +1094,8 @@ static void aarch64_neoverse_n1_initfn(Object *obj)
 
     /* From D5.1 AArch64 PMU register summary */
     cpu->isar.reset_pmcr_el0 = 0x410c3000;
+
+    define_neoverse_n1_cp_reginfo(cpu);
 }
 
 static void aarch64_host_initfn(Object *obj)
diff --git a/target/arm/cpu_tcg.c b/target/arm/cpu_tcg.c
index df0c45e523..40ec120eb2 100644
--- a/target/arm/cpu_tcg.c
+++ b/target/arm/cpu_tcg.c
@@ -150,6 +150,72 @@ void define_cortex_a72_a57_a53_cp_reginfo(ARMCPU *cpu)
 {
     define_arm_cp_regs(cpu, cortex_a72_a57_a53_cp_reginfo);
 }
+
+static const ARMCPRegInfo neoverse_n1_cp_reginfo[] = {
+    { .name = "ATCR_EL1", .state = ARM_CP_STATE_AA64,
+      .opc0 = 3, .opc1 = 0, .crn = 15, .crm = 7, .opc2 = 0,
+      .access = PL1_RW, .type = ARM_CP_CONST, .resetvalue = 0 },
+    { .name = "ATCR_EL2", .state = ARM_CP_STATE_AA64,
+      .opc0 = 3, .opc1 = 4, .crn = 15, .crm = 7, .opc2 = 0,
+      .access = PL2_RW, .type = ARM_CP_CONST, .resetvalue = 0 },
+    { .name = "ATCR_EL3", .state = ARM_CP_STATE_AA64,
+      .opc0 = 3, .opc1 = 6, .crn = 15, .crm = 7, .opc2 = 0,
+      .access = PL3_RW, .type = ARM_CP_CONST, .resetvalue = 0 },
+    { .name = "ATCR_EL12", .state = ARM_CP_STATE_AA64,
+      .opc0 = 3, .opc1 = 5, .crn = 15, .crm = 7, .opc2 = 0,
+      .access = PL2_RW, .type = ARM_CP_CONST, .resetvalue = 0 },
+    { .name = "AVTCR_EL2", .state = ARM_CP_STATE_AA64,
+      .opc0 = 3, .opc1 = 4, .crn = 15, .crm = 7, .opc2 = 1,
+      .access = PL2_RW, .type = ARM_CP_CONST, .resetvalue = 0 },
+    { .name = "CPUACTLR_EL1", .state = ARM_CP_STATE_AA64,
+      .opc0 = 3, .opc1 = 0, .crn = 15, .crm = 1, .opc2 = 0,
+      .access = PL1_RW, .type = ARM_CP_CONST, .resetvalue = 0 },
+    { .name = "CPUACTLR2_EL1", .state = ARM_CP_STATE_AA64,
+      .opc0 = 3, .opc1 = 0, .crn = 15, .crm = 1, .opc2 = 1,
+      .access = PL1_RW, .type = ARM_CP_CONST, .resetvalue = 0 },
+    { .name = "CPUACTLR3_EL1", .state = ARM_CP_STATE_AA64,
+      .opc0 = 3, .opc1 = 0, .crn = 15, .crm = 1, .opc2 = 2,
+      .access = PL1_RW, .type = ARM_CP_CONST, .resetvalue = 0 },
+    /*
+     * Report CPUCFR_EL1.SCU as 1, as we do not implement the DSU
+     * (and in particular its system registers).
+     */
+    { .name = "CPUCFR_EL1", .state = ARM_CP_STATE_AA64,
+      .opc0 = 3, .opc1 = 0, .crn = 15, .crm = 0, .opc2 = 0,
+      .access = PL1_R, .type = ARM_CP_CONST, .resetvalue = 4 },
+    { .name = "CPUECTLR_EL1", .state = ARM_CP_STATE_AA64,
+      .opc0 = 3, .opc1 = 0, .crn = 15, .crm = 1, .opc2 = 4,
+      .access = PL1_RW, .type = ARM_CP_CONST, .resetvalue = 0x961563010 },
+    { .name = "CPUPCR_EL3", .state = ARM_CP_STATE_AA64,
+      .opc0 = 3, .opc1 = 6, .crn = 15, .crm = 8, .opc2 = 1,
+      .access = PL3_RW, .type = ARM_CP_CONST, .resetvalue = 0 },
+    { .name = "CPUPMR_EL3", .state = ARM_CP_STATE_AA64,
+      .opc0 = 3, .opc1 = 6, .crn = 15, .crm = 8, .opc2 = 3,
+      .access = PL3_RW, .type = ARM_CP_CONST, .resetvalue = 0 },
+    { .name = "CPUPOR_EL3", .state = ARM_CP_STATE_AA64,
+      .opc0 = 3, .opc1 = 6, .crn = 15, .crm = 8, .opc2 = 2,
+      .access = PL3_RW, .type = ARM_CP_CONST, .resetvalue = 0 },
+    { .name = "CPUPSELR_EL3", .state = ARM_CP_STATE_AA64,
+      .opc0 = 3, .opc1 = 6, .crn = 15, .crm = 8, .opc2 = 0,
+      .access = PL3_RW, .type = ARM_CP_CONST, .resetvalue = 0 },
+    { .name = "CPUPWRCTLR_EL1", .state = ARM_CP_STATE_AA64,
+      .opc0 = 3, .opc1 = 0, .crn = 15, .crm = 2, .opc2 = 7,
+      .access = PL1_RW, .type = ARM_CP_CONST, .resetvalue = 0 },
+    { .name = "ERXPFGCDN_EL1", .state = ARM_CP_STATE_AA64,
+      .opc0 = 3, .opc1 = 0, .crn = 15, .crm = 2, .opc2 = 2,
+      .access = PL1_RW, .type = ARM_CP_CONST, .resetvalue = 0 },
+    { .name = "ERXPFGCTL_EL1", .state = ARM_CP_STATE_AA64,
+      .opc0 = 3, .opc1 = 0, .crn = 15, .crm = 2, .opc2 = 1,
+      .access = PL1_RW, .type = ARM_CP_CONST, .resetvalue = 0 },
+    { .name = "ERXPFGF_EL1", .state = ARM_CP_STATE_AA64,
+      .opc0 = 3, .opc1 = 0, .crn = 15, .crm = 2, .opc2 = 0,
+      .access = PL1_RW, .type = ARM_CP_CONST, .resetvalue = 0 },
+};
+
+void define_neoverse_n1_cp_reginfo(ARMCPU *cpu)
+{
+    define_arm_cp_regs(cpu, neoverse_n1_cp_reginfo);
+}
 #endif /* !CONFIG_USER_ONLY */
 
 /* CPU models. These are not needed for the AArch64 linux-user build. */
diff --git a/target/arm/internals.h b/target/arm/internals.h
index 3c7341e774..0c393e971a 100644
--- a/target/arm/internals.h
+++ b/target/arm/internals.h
@@ -1356,8 +1356,10 @@ void arm_cpu_lpa2_finalize(ARMCPU *cpu, Error **errp);
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_USER_ONLY
 static inline void define_cortex_a72_a57_a53_cp_reginfo(ARMCPU *cpu) { }
+static inline void define_neoverse_n1_cp_reginfo(ARMCPU *cpu) {}
 #else
 void define_cortex_a72_a57_a53_cp_reginfo(ARMCPU *cpu);
+void define_neoverse_n1_cp_reginfo(ARMCPU *cpu);
 #endif
 
 bool el_is_in_host(CPUARMState *env, int el);
-- 
2.37.3
Re: [PATCH v3] target/arm: Add Neoverse-N1 registers
Posted by Richard Henderson 1 year, 1 month ago
On 3/6/23 18:14, Chen Baozi wrote:
> Add implementation defined registers for neoverse-n1 which
> would be accessed by TF-A. Since there is no DSU in Qemu,
> CPUCFR_EL1.SCU bit is set to 1 to avoid DSU registers definition.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Chen Baozi <chenbaozi@phytium.com.cn>
> Tested-by: Marcin Juszkiewicz <marcin.juszkiewicz@linaro.org>
> ---
>   target/arm/cpu64.c     |  2 ++
>   target/arm/cpu_tcg.c   | 66 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>   target/arm/internals.h |  2 ++
>   3 files changed, 70 insertions(+)

You really need to base on upstream master, as these files have moved.

> 
> diff --git a/target/arm/cpu64.c b/target/arm/cpu64.c
> index 4066950da1..a6ae7cafac 100644
> --- a/target/arm/cpu64.c
> +++ b/target/arm/cpu64.c
> @@ -1094,6 +1094,8 @@ static void aarch64_neoverse_n1_initfn(Object *obj)
>   
>       /* From D5.1 AArch64 PMU register summary */
>       cpu->isar.reset_pmcr_el0 = 0x410c3000;
> +
> +    define_neoverse_n1_cp_reginfo(cpu);
>   }
>   
>   static void aarch64_host_initfn(Object *obj)
> diff --git a/target/arm/cpu_tcg.c b/target/arm/cpu_tcg.c
> index df0c45e523..40ec120eb2 100644
> --- a/target/arm/cpu_tcg.c
> +++ b/target/arm/cpu_tcg.c
> @@ -150,6 +150,72 @@ void define_cortex_a72_a57_a53_cp_reginfo(ARMCPU *cpu)
>   {
>       define_arm_cp_regs(cpu, cortex_a72_a57_a53_cp_reginfo);
>   }
> +
> +static const ARMCPRegInfo neoverse_n1_cp_reginfo[] = {

This belongs in target/arm/tcg/cpu64.c, adjacent to or inside aarch64_neoverse_n1_initfn.

You do not want to match the placement of define_cortex_a72_a57_a53_cp_reginfo, because 
that has a more complex usage across aarch64 kvm and tcg, along with arm32 "-cpu max".

> diff --git a/target/arm/internals.h b/target/arm/internals.h
> index 3c7341e774..0c393e971a 100644
> --- a/target/arm/internals.h
> +++ b/target/arm/internals.h
> @@ -1356,8 +1356,10 @@ void arm_cpu_lpa2_finalize(ARMCPU *cpu, Error **errp);
>   
>   #ifdef CONFIG_USER_ONLY
>   static inline void define_cortex_a72_a57_a53_cp_reginfo(ARMCPU *cpu) { }
> +static inline void define_neoverse_n1_cp_reginfo(ARMCPU *cpu) {}
>   #else
>   void define_cortex_a72_a57_a53_cp_reginfo(ARMCPU *cpu);
> +void define_neoverse_n1_cp_reginfo(ARMCPU *cpu);

No need for a public declaration at all.


r~
Re: [PATCH v3] target/arm: Add Neoverse-N1 registers
Posted by Richard Henderson 1 year, 1 month ago
On 3/6/23 18:29, Richard Henderson wrote:
> On 3/6/23 18:14, Chen Baozi wrote:
>> Add implementation defined registers for neoverse-n1 which
>> would be accessed by TF-A. Since there is no DSU in Qemu,
>> CPUCFR_EL1.SCU bit is set to 1 to avoid DSU registers definition.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Chen Baozi <chenbaozi@phytium.com.cn>
>> Tested-by: Marcin Juszkiewicz <marcin.juszkiewicz@linaro.org>
>> ---
>>   target/arm/cpu64.c     |  2 ++
>>   target/arm/cpu_tcg.c   | 66 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>   target/arm/internals.h |  2 ++
>>   3 files changed, 70 insertions(+)
> 
> You really need to base on upstream master, as these files have moved.

I beg your pardon, my mistake.  Only half of the patch set which moves these files was 
applied.  I had to do my own rebase around file movement today, but these three are not 
yet affected.

But do be aware that there is a potential conflict out there.

My comments re the placement of the array still apply.


r~

Re: [PATCH v3] target/arm: Add Neoverse-N1 registers
Posted by Chen Baozi 1 year, 1 month ago
Hi Richard,

> On Mar 7, 2023, at 10:33, Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org> wrote:
> 
> On 3/6/23 18:29, Richard Henderson wrote:
>> On 3/6/23 18:14, Chen Baozi wrote:
>>> Add implementation defined registers for neoverse-n1 which
>>> would be accessed by TF-A. Since there is no DSU in Qemu,
>>> CPUCFR_EL1.SCU bit is set to 1 to avoid DSU registers definition.
>>> 
>>> Signed-off-by: Chen Baozi <chenbaozi@phytium.com.cn>
>>> Tested-by: Marcin Juszkiewicz <marcin.juszkiewicz@linaro.org>
>>> ---
>>>   target/arm/cpu64.c     |  2 ++
>>>   target/arm/cpu_tcg.c   | 66 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>   target/arm/internals.h |  2 ++
>>>   3 files changed, 70 insertions(+)
>> You really need to base on upstream master, as these files have moved.
> 
> I beg your pardon, my mistake.  Only half of the patch set which moves these files was applied.  I had to do my own rebase around file movement today, but these three are not yet affected.

Never mind. I was aware of that. Waiting for them to be applied and then rework.
> 
> But do be aware that there is a potential conflict out there.
> 
> My comments re the placement of the array still apply.

Ack.

Cheers,

Baozi.