From nobody Sun Dec 29 18:25:53 2024 Delivered-To: importer2@patchew.org Authentication-Results: mx.zohomail.com; spf=pass (zohomail.com: domain of gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+importer2=patchew.org@nongnu.org; dmarc=pass(p=none dis=none) header.from=nongnu.org ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1718899470; cv=none; d=zohomail.com; s=zohoarc; b=i71BTZB9Ogun4c4BrUTA2oVymJ4jOp4DLnl8K16nUnrTj5MIlezQ1vyrMDrQgd+Eqe4DZwBXBj7+pI8488l1+pfCVDBMjPH3i27tmvX/TdoVWbgk9bn3SIuRHYcGcWTFyTgqW1I8sk2NerwFzcGdEs1HPZE/qwnEe03Pqkd0g2s= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=zohomail.com; s=zohoarc; t=1718899470; h=Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Cc:Cc:Date:Date:From:From:In-Reply-To:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Id:List-Archive:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:MIME-Version:Message-ID:Reply-To:Reply-To:References:Sender:Subject:Subject:To:To:Message-Id; bh=lxLAgb1usqdrbP/KGVzwv11kOprj+q+S+Ap0X/Pohds=; b=EiCemNR/9NbbPzWFj5NQgCVn0LIfGjpQqyYH0liyGlcLKxpGChzUSkcthY65L7/ZyBt0rPjS+6AtysS5zxGWiOYRWsB16QeRbTONGijn07xZU3hvNBb8dxJUM8LhUIJcYYQWlIFoucQe/S9xrCXHB6xbYLcfI1dU9qXaYNOwtl4= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.zohomail.com; spf=pass (zohomail.com: domain of gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+importer2=patchew.org@nongnu.org; dmarc=pass header.from= (p=none dis=none) Return-Path: Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) by mx.zohomail.com with SMTPS id 1718899470879978.62832021552; Thu, 20 Jun 2024 09:04:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sKKGW-0002R6-UA; Thu, 20 Jun 2024 12:04:00 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sKKGV-0002PR-Dl for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 20 Jun 2024 12:03:59 -0400 Received: from frasgout.his.huawei.com ([185.176.79.56]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sKKGT-0007OB-Qq for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 20 Jun 2024 12:03:59 -0400 Received: from mail.maildlp.com (unknown [172.18.186.231]) by frasgout.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4W4lcZ365Gz6K9Gf; Fri, 21 Jun 2024 00:02:22 +0800 (CST) Received: from lhrpeml500005.china.huawei.com (unknown [7.191.163.240]) by mail.maildlp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 529671400D7; Fri, 21 Jun 2024 00:03:56 +0800 (CST) Received: from SecurePC-101-06.china.huawei.com (10.122.19.247) by lhrpeml500005.china.huawei.com (7.191.163.240) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.1.2507.39; Thu, 20 Jun 2024 17:03:55 +0100 To: , , Markus Armbruster , , , , , Richard Henderson CC: , Dave Jiang , Huang Ying , Paolo Bonzini , , , Michael Roth , Ani Sinha Subject: [PATCH v3 01/11] hw/acpi: Fix ordering of BDF in Generic Initiator PCI Device Handle. Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2024 17:03:09 +0100 Message-ID: <20240620160324.109058-2-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.43.0 In-Reply-To: <20240620160324.109058-1-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> References: <20240620160324.109058-1-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Originating-IP: [10.122.19.247] X-ClientProxiedBy: lhrpeml500001.china.huawei.com (7.191.163.213) To lhrpeml500005.china.huawei.com (7.191.163.240) Received-SPF: pass (zohomail.com: domain of gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.51.188.17; envelope-from=qemu-devel-bounces+importer2=patchew.org@nongnu.org; helo=lists.gnu.org; Received-SPF: pass client-ip=185.176.79.56; envelope-from=jonathan.cameron@huawei.com; helo=frasgout.his.huawei.com X-Spam_score_int: -41 X-Spam_score: -4.2 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.2 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-to: Jonathan Cameron From: Jonathan Cameron via Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+importer2=patchew.org@nongnu.org Sender: qemu-devel-bounces+importer2=patchew.org@nongnu.org X-ZM-MESSAGEID: 1718899472621100005 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" The ordering in ACPI specification [1] has bus number in the lowest byte. As ACPI tables are little endian this is the reverse of the ordering used by PCI_BUILD_BDF(). As a minimal fix split the QEMU BDF up into bus and devfn and write them as single bytes in the correct order. [1] ACPI Spec 6.3, Table 5.80 Fixes: 0a5b5acdf2d8 ("hw/acpi: Implement the SRAT GI affinity structure") Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron Reviewed-by: Igor Mammedov --- v3: New patch. Note this code will go away, so this is intended for backporting purposes --- hw/acpi/acpi_generic_initiator.c | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/hw/acpi/acpi_generic_initiator.c b/hw/acpi/acpi_generic_initia= tor.c index 17b9a052f5..3d2b567999 100644 --- a/hw/acpi/acpi_generic_initiator.c +++ b/hw/acpi/acpi_generic_initiator.c @@ -92,7 +92,8 @@ build_srat_generic_pci_initiator_affinity(GArray *table_d= ata, int node, =20 /* Device Handle - PCI */ build_append_int_noprefix(table_data, handle->segment, 2); - build_append_int_noprefix(table_data, handle->bdf, 2); + build_append_int_noprefix(table_data, PCI_BUS_NUM(handle->bdf), 1); + build_append_int_noprefix(table_data, PCI_BDF_TO_DEVFN(handle->bdf), 1= ); for (index =3D 0; index < 12; index++) { build_append_int_noprefix(table_data, 0, 1); } --=20 2.43.0