[PATCH v42 38/98] hw/sd/sdcard: Prepare SDProto to contain more fields

Philippe Mathieu-Daudé posted 98 patches 6 months ago
There is a newer version of this series
[PATCH v42 38/98] hw/sd/sdcard: Prepare SDProto to contain more fields
Posted by Philippe Mathieu-Daudé 6 months ago
Convert array of command handlers to array of structures.
The structure contains the command handler. No logical
change intended.

Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org>
---
 hw/sd/sd.c | 29 +++++++++++++++--------------
 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

diff --git a/hw/sd/sd.c b/hw/sd/sd.c
index f4bdd12b26..558c39419d 100644
--- a/hw/sd/sd.c
+++ b/hw/sd/sd.c
@@ -94,8 +94,9 @@ typedef sd_rsp_type_t (*sd_cmd_handler)(SDState *sd, SDRequest req);
 
 typedef struct SDProto {
     const char *name;
-    sd_cmd_handler cmd[SDMMC_CMD_MAX];
-    sd_cmd_handler acmd[SDMMC_CMD_MAX];
+    struct {
+        sd_cmd_handler handler;
+    } cmd[SDMMC_CMD_MAX], acmd[SDMMC_CMD_MAX];
 } SDProto;
 
 struct SDState {
@@ -1305,8 +1306,8 @@ static sd_rsp_type_t sd_normal_command(SDState *sd, SDRequest req)
         return sd_illegal;
     }
 
-    if (sd->proto->cmd[req.cmd]) {
-        return sd->proto->cmd[req.cmd](sd, req);
+    if (sd->proto->cmd[req.cmd].handler) {
+        return sd->proto->cmd[req.cmd].handler(sd, req);
     }
 
     switch (req.cmd) {
@@ -1753,8 +1754,8 @@ static sd_rsp_type_t sd_app_command(SDState *sd,
                              req.cmd, req.arg, sd_state_name(sd->state));
     sd->card_status |= APP_CMD;
 
-    if (sd->proto->acmd[req.cmd]) {
-        return sd->proto->acmd[req.cmd](sd, req);
+    if (sd->proto->acmd[req.cmd].handler) {
+        return sd->proto->acmd[req.cmd].handler(sd, req);
     }
 
     switch (req.cmd) {
@@ -2267,22 +2268,22 @@ void sd_enable(SDState *sd, bool enable)
 static const SDProto sd_proto_spi = {
     .name = "SPI",
     .cmd = {
-        [0]         = sd_cmd_GO_IDLE_STATE,
-        [1]         = spi_cmd_SEND_OP_COND,
+        [0]  = {sd_cmd_GO_IDLE_STATE},
+        [1]  = {spi_cmd_SEND_OP_COND},
     },
     .acmd = {
-        [41]        = spi_cmd_SEND_OP_COND,
+        [41] = {spi_cmd_SEND_OP_COND},
     },
 };
 
 static const SDProto sd_proto_sd = {
     .name = "SD",
     .cmd = {
-        [0]         = sd_cmd_GO_IDLE_STATE,
-        [2]         = sd_cmd_ALL_SEND_CID,
-        [3]         = sd_cmd_SEND_RELATIVE_ADDR,
-        [19]        = sd_cmd_SEND_TUNING_BLOCK,
-        [23]        = sd_cmd_SET_BLOCK_COUNT,
+        [0]  = {sd_cmd_GO_IDLE_STATE},
+        [2]  = {sd_cmd_ALL_SEND_CID},
+        [3]  = {sd_cmd_SEND_RELATIVE_ADDR},
+        [19] = {sd_cmd_SEND_TUNING_BLOCK},
+        [23] = {sd_cmd_SET_BLOCK_COUNT},
     },
 };
 
-- 
2.41.0


Re: [PATCH v42 38/98] hw/sd/sdcard: Prepare SDProto to contain more fields
Posted by Cédric Le Goater 6 months ago
On 6/28/24 9:01 AM, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> Convert array of command handlers to array of structures.
> The structure contains the command handler. No logical
> change intended.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org>


Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@redhat.com>

Thanks,

C.


> ---
>   hw/sd/sd.c | 29 +++++++++++++++--------------
>   1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/hw/sd/sd.c b/hw/sd/sd.c
> index f4bdd12b26..558c39419d 100644
> --- a/hw/sd/sd.c
> +++ b/hw/sd/sd.c
> @@ -94,8 +94,9 @@ typedef sd_rsp_type_t (*sd_cmd_handler)(SDState *sd, SDRequest req);
>   
>   typedef struct SDProto {
>       const char *name;
> -    sd_cmd_handler cmd[SDMMC_CMD_MAX];
> -    sd_cmd_handler acmd[SDMMC_CMD_MAX];
> +    struct {
> +        sd_cmd_handler handler;
> +    } cmd[SDMMC_CMD_MAX], acmd[SDMMC_CMD_MAX];
>   } SDProto;
>   
>   struct SDState {
> @@ -1305,8 +1306,8 @@ static sd_rsp_type_t sd_normal_command(SDState *sd, SDRequest req)
>           return sd_illegal;
>       }
>   
> -    if (sd->proto->cmd[req.cmd]) {
> -        return sd->proto->cmd[req.cmd](sd, req);
> +    if (sd->proto->cmd[req.cmd].handler) {
> +        return sd->proto->cmd[req.cmd].handler(sd, req);
>       }
>   
>       switch (req.cmd) {
> @@ -1753,8 +1754,8 @@ static sd_rsp_type_t sd_app_command(SDState *sd,
>                                req.cmd, req.arg, sd_state_name(sd->state));
>       sd->card_status |= APP_CMD;
>   
> -    if (sd->proto->acmd[req.cmd]) {
> -        return sd->proto->acmd[req.cmd](sd, req);
> +    if (sd->proto->acmd[req.cmd].handler) {
> +        return sd->proto->acmd[req.cmd].handler(sd, req);
>       }
>   
>       switch (req.cmd) {
> @@ -2267,22 +2268,22 @@ void sd_enable(SDState *sd, bool enable)
>   static const SDProto sd_proto_spi = {
>       .name = "SPI",
>       .cmd = {
> -        [0]         = sd_cmd_GO_IDLE_STATE,
> -        [1]         = spi_cmd_SEND_OP_COND,
> +        [0]  = {sd_cmd_GO_IDLE_STATE},
> +        [1]  = {spi_cmd_SEND_OP_COND},
>       },
>       .acmd = {
> -        [41]        = spi_cmd_SEND_OP_COND,
> +        [41] = {spi_cmd_SEND_OP_COND},
>       },
>   };
>   
>   static const SDProto sd_proto_sd = {
>       .name = "SD",
>       .cmd = {
> -        [0]         = sd_cmd_GO_IDLE_STATE,
> -        [2]         = sd_cmd_ALL_SEND_CID,
> -        [3]         = sd_cmd_SEND_RELATIVE_ADDR,
> -        [19]        = sd_cmd_SEND_TUNING_BLOCK,
> -        [23]        = sd_cmd_SET_BLOCK_COUNT,
> +        [0]  = {sd_cmd_GO_IDLE_STATE},
> +        [2]  = {sd_cmd_ALL_SEND_CID},
> +        [3]  = {sd_cmd_SEND_RELATIVE_ADDR},
> +        [19] = {sd_cmd_SEND_TUNING_BLOCK},
> +        [23] = {sd_cmd_SET_BLOCK_COUNT},
>       },
>   };
>