From nobody Mon May 13 11:15:43 2024 Delivered-To: importer2@patchew.org Authentication-Results: mx.zohomail.com; dkim=fail; spf=pass (zohomail.com: domain of gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+importer2=patchew.org@nongnu.org; dmarc=fail(p=none dis=none) header.from=verisilicon.com Return-Path: Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) by mx.zohomail.com with SMTPS id 1652150418294940.8596649929062; Mon, 9 May 2022 19:40:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([::1]:46198 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1noFnM-0008Fk-RL for importer2@patchew.org; Mon, 09 May 2022 22:40:16 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:41066) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1noFmB-0007QZ-Tp; Mon, 09 May 2022 22:39:04 -0400 Received: from shasxm06.verisilicon.com ([101.89.135.45]:47791 helo=shasxm03.verisilicon.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1noFm8-0000Zr-SB; Mon, 09 May 2022 22:39:03 -0400 Received: from SHASXM03.verisilicon.com ([fe80::938:4dda:a2f9:38aa]) by SHASXM06.verisilicon.com ([fe80::59a8:ce34:dc14:ddda%16]) with mapi id 14.03.0408.000; Tue, 10 May 2022 10:38:43 +0800 Content-Language: zh-CN Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=Verisilicon.com; s=default; c=simple/simple; t=1652150324; h=from:subject:to:date:message-id; bh=xmTYP2gyBpcYotOXr2Ri9mNGCpegRuvWugSaO3Ql2xk=; b=bUvFpTHV17EBfv/lo2MAca50e9m6NIYukMS0g/mHgpEeq6+ctXjM/hpnKwaNmCK4Knrv+AakG4b 6o5ddH8HB1GRHulh6wyxAjBUhPP1gplDrxpYG9hNnETOrBem2dmtO9iFa0S+V50nu2yZt8G570KGw /valSNTK0K8rvHw5eGY= From: "Gao, Lu" To: "qemu-devel@nongnu.org" , =?gb2312?B?UGhpbGlwcGUgTWF0aGlldS1EYXVkqKY=?= , Bin Meng CC: "Wen, Jianxian" , "open list:SD (Secure Card)" Subject: =?gb2312?B?tPC4tDogW1BBVENIXSBody9zZC9zZGhjaTogQmxvY2sgU2l6ZSBSZWdpc3Rl?= =?gb2312?Q?r_bits_[14:12]_is_lost?= Thread-Topic: [PATCH] hw/sd/sdhci: Block Size Register bits [14:12] is lost Thread-Index: AQHYPOiHQ0Dy2cvFy0+IfX/zeZSb4q0ADs8AgBelF0A= Date: Tue, 10 May 2022 02:38:42 +0000 Message-ID: <34781C803212B140A51E6B66D9092E5D01A9227952@SHASXM03.verisilicon.com> References: <20220321055618.4026-1-lu.gao@verisilicon.com> Accept-Language: en-US, zh-CN X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.10.166.47] x-tm-as-product-ver: SMEX-11.0.0.4283-8.100.1062-25628.004 x-tm-as-result: No--4.710200-0.000000-31 x-tm-as-matchedid: 151186-700225-703140-701090-703503-139703-106230-704010-7 03408-704706-700273-700523-704186-704318-703880-700535-702880-700598-703001 -705244-703115-704822-701510-705248-704240-702395-188019-704477-703968-7028 98-700946-703953-704959-702299-701812-703812-704990-702975-704849-704823-89 9220-148004-148133-42000-42003 x-tm-as-user-approved-sender: Yes x-tm-as-user-blocked-sender: No MIME-Version: 1.0 Received-SPF: pass (zohomail.com: domain of gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.51.188.17; envelope-from=qemu-devel-bounces+importer2=patchew.org@nongnu.org; helo=lists.gnu.org; Received-SPF: pass client-ip=101.89.135.45; envelope-from=Lu.Gao@verisilicon.com; helo=shasxm03.verisilicon.com X-Spam_score_int: 35 X-Spam_score: 3.5 X-Spam_bar: +++ X-Spam_report: (3.5 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, CHARSET_FARAWAY_HEADER=3.2, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, MIME_CHARSET_FARAWAY=2.45, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+importer2=patchew.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" X-ZohoMail-DKIM: fail (Header signature does not verify) X-ZM-MESSAGEID: 1652150419723100001 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Ping https://patchew.org/QEMU/20220321055618.4026-1-lu.gao@verisilicon.com/ Please help review the patch. Thanks. B.R. -----=E9=82=AE=E4=BB=B6=E5=8E=9F=E4=BB=B6----- =E5=8F=91=E4=BB=B6=E4=BA=BA: Gao, Lu=20 =E5=8F=91=E9=80=81=E6=97=B6=E9=97=B4: Monday, April 25, 2022 9:35 AM =E6=94=B6=E4=BB=B6=E4=BA=BA: Gao, Lu; qemu-devel@nongnu.org =E6=8A=84=E9=80=81: Wen, Jianxian; Philippe Mathieu-Daud=C3=A9; Bin Meng; o= pen list:SD (Secure Card) =E4=B8=BB=E9=A2=98: =E7=AD=94=E5=A4=8D: [PATCH] hw/sd/sdhci: Block Size Reg= ister bits [14:12] is lost ping https://patchew.org/QEMU/20220321055618.4026-1-lu.gao@verisilicon.com/ Please help review the patch. Thanks. B.R. -----=E9=82=AE=E4=BB=B6=E5=8E=9F=E4=BB=B6----- =E5=8F=91=E4=BB=B6=E4=BA=BA: Gao, Lu=20 =E5=8F=91=E9=80=81=E6=97=B6=E9=97=B4: Monday, March 21, 2022 1:56 PM =E6=94=B6=E4=BB=B6=E4=BA=BA: qemu-devel@nongnu.org =E6=8A=84=E9=80=81: Gao, Lu; Wen, Jianxian; Philippe Mathieu-Daud=C3=A9; Bi= n Meng; open list:SD (Secure Card) =E4=B8=BB=E9=A2=98: [PATCH] hw/sd/sdhci: Block Size Register bits [14:12] i= s lost Block Size Register bits [14:12] is SDMA Buffer Boundary, it is missed in register write, but it is needed in SDMA transfer. e.g. it will be used in sdhci_sdma_transfer_multi_blocks to calculate boundary_ variables. Missing this field will cause wrong operation for different SDMA Buffer Boundary settings. Signed-off-by: Lu Gao Signed-off-by: Jianxian Wen --- hw/sd/sdhci.c | 15 +++++++++++---- 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/hw/sd/sdhci.c b/hw/sd/sdhci.c index e0bbc90344..350ceb487d 100644 --- a/hw/sd/sdhci.c +++ b/hw/sd/sdhci.c @@ -321,6 +321,8 @@ static void sdhci_poweron_reset(DeviceState *dev) =20 static void sdhci_data_transfer(void *opaque); =20 +#define BLOCK_SIZE_MASK (4 * KiB - 1) + static void sdhci_send_command(SDHCIState *s) { SDRequest request; @@ -371,7 +373,8 @@ static void sdhci_send_command(SDHCIState *s) =20 sdhci_update_irq(s); =20 - if (!timeout && s->blksize && (s->cmdreg & SDHC_CMD_DATA_PRESENT)) { + if (!timeout && (s->blksize & BLOCK_SIZE_MASK) && + (s->cmdreg & SDHC_CMD_DATA_PRESENT)) { s->data_count =3D 0; sdhci_data_transfer(s); } @@ -406,7 +409,6 @@ static void sdhci_end_transfer(SDHCIState *s) /* * Programmed i/o data transfer */ -#define BLOCK_SIZE_MASK (4 * KiB - 1) =20 /* Fill host controller's read buffer with BLKSIZE bytes of data from card= */ static void sdhci_read_block_from_card(SDHCIState *s) @@ -1137,7 +1139,8 @@ sdhci_write(void *opaque, hwaddr offset, uint64_t val= , unsigned size) s->sdmasysad =3D (s->sdmasysad & mask) | value; MASKED_WRITE(s->sdmasysad, mask, value); /* Writing to last byte of sdmasysad might trigger transfer */ - if (!(mask & 0xFF000000) && s->blkcnt && s->blksize && + if (!(mask & 0xFF000000) && s->blkcnt && + (s->blksize & BLOCK_SIZE_MASK) && SDHC_DMA_TYPE(s->hostctl1) =3D=3D SDHC_CTRL_SDMA) { if (s->trnmod & SDHC_TRNS_MULTI) { sdhci_sdma_transfer_multi_blocks(s); @@ -1151,7 +1154,11 @@ sdhci_write(void *opaque, hwaddr offset, uint64_t va= l, unsigned size) if (!TRANSFERRING_DATA(s->prnsts)) { uint16_t blksize =3D s->blksize; =20 - MASKED_WRITE(s->blksize, mask, extract32(value, 0, 12)); + /* + * [14:12] SDMA Buffer Boundary + * [11:00] Transfer Block Size + */ + MASKED_WRITE(s->blksize, mask, extract32(value, 0, 15)); MASKED_WRITE(s->blkcnt, mask >> 16, value >> 16); =20 /* Limit block size to the maximum buffer size */ --=20 2.17.1