src/hw/tpm_drivers.c | 226 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--- src/hw/tpm_drivers.h | 26 ++++++ src/x86.h | 5 ++ 3 files changed, 245 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
From: Marc-André Lureau <marcandre.lureau@redhat.com> Hi, The following series implements a limited TPM CRB driver. The TIS device with a TPM 2.0 seems to be ignored by Windows 10, so I implemented a simple CRB device that I will send shortly on the qemu-devel. With the CRB device, Windows 10 correctly recognized and exchange with a TPM 2.0. As long as the device isn't in qemu, I suppose this series should remain RFC. Feedback welcome! Marc-André Lureau (4): x86: add readq() tpm: generalize init_timeout() tpm: use get_tpm_version() callback WIP: add TPM CRB device support src/hw/tpm_drivers.c | 226 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--- src/hw/tpm_drivers.h | 26 ++++++ src/x86.h | 5 ++ 3 files changed, 245 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) -- 2.14.1.146.gd35faa819 _______________________________________________ SeaBIOS mailing list SeaBIOS@seabios.org https://mail.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/seabios
On Fri, Oct 06, 2017 at 04:33:23PM +0200, marcandre.lureau@redhat.com wrote: > From: Marc-André Lureau <marcandre.lureau@redhat.com> > > Hi, > > The following series implements a limited TPM CRB driver. The TIS > device with a TPM 2.0 seems to be ignored by Windows 10, so I > implemented a simple CRB device that I will send shortly on the > qemu-devel. With the CRB device, Windows 10 correctly recognized and > exchange with a TPM 2.0. > > As long as the device isn't in qemu, I suppose this series should > remain RFC. Thanks. The patches look fine to me, but the corresponding patches will need to be committed to qemu before seabios. -Kevin _______________________________________________ SeaBIOS mailing list SeaBIOS@seabios.org https://mail.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/seabios
On 10/06/2017 10:33 AM, marcandre.lureau@redhat.com wrote: > From: Marc-André Lureau <marcandre.lureau@redhat.com> > > Hi, > > The following series implements a limited TPM CRB driver. The TIS > device with a TPM 2.0 seems to be ignored by Windows 10, so I > implemented a simple CRB device that I will send shortly on the > qemu-devel. With the CRB device, Windows 10 correctly recognized and > exchange with a TPM 2.0. > > As long as the device isn't in qemu, I suppose this series should > remain RFC. I think you can repost it now... _______________________________________________ SeaBIOS mailing list SeaBIOS@seabios.org https://mail.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/seabios
Hi On Sun, Feb 11, 2018 at 5:53 PM, Stefan Berger <stefanb@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote: > On 10/06/2017 10:33 AM, marcandre.lureau@redhat.com wrote: >> >> From: Marc-André Lureau <marcandre.lureau@redhat.com> >> >> Hi, >> >> The following series implements a limited TPM CRB driver. The TIS >> device with a TPM 2.0 seems to be ignored by Windows 10, so I >> implemented a simple CRB device that I will send shortly on the >> qemu-devel. With the CRB device, Windows 10 correctly recognized and >> exchange with a TPM 2.0. >> >> As long as the device isn't in qemu, I suppose this series should >> remain RFC. > > > I think you can repost it now... Indeed, the device is now in qemu. However, I don't have much time / priority to work on seabios support for now. Since you have additional patches on top, and you are experienced with that, perhaps you could send the whole series including my patches (adding your reviewed-by / signed-off and some text if you modified my patches)? I suppose that would work for Kevin too? thanks _______________________________________________ SeaBIOS mailing list SeaBIOS@seabios.org https://mail.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/seabios
On 02/12/2018 01:17 PM, Marc-Andre Lureau wrote:
> Hi
>
> On Sun, Feb 11, 2018 at 5:53 PM, Stefan Berger
> <stefanb@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
>> On 10/06/2017 10:33 AM, marcandre.lureau@redhat.com wrote:
>>> From: Marc-André Lureau <marcandre.lureau@redhat.com>
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> The following series implements a limited TPM CRB driver. The TIS
>>> device with a TPM 2.0 seems to be ignored by Windows 10, so I
>>> implemented a simple CRB device that I will send shortly on the
>>> qemu-devel. With the CRB device, Windows 10 correctly recognized and
>>> exchange with a TPM 2.0.
>>>
>>> As long as the device isn't in qemu, I suppose this series should
>>> remain RFC.
>>
>> I think you can repost it now...
> Indeed, the device is now in qemu. However, I don't have much time /
> priority to work on seabios support for now. Since you have additional
> patches on top, and you are experienced with that, perhaps you could
> send the whole series including my patches (adding your reviewed-by /
> signed-off and some text if you modified my patches)? I suppose that
> would work for Kevin too?
Fine by me.
Stefan
_______________________________________________
SeaBIOS mailing list
SeaBIOS@seabios.org
https://mail.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/seabios
© 2016 - 2025 Red Hat, Inc.