This is based on wait_startup() from the Linux tpm_tis driver.
Signed-off-by: Stephen Douthit <stephend@silicom-usa.com>
Tested-by: Stephen Douthit <stephend@silicom-usa.com>
---
src/hw/tpm_drivers.c | 13 ++++++++++++-
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/src/hw/tpm_drivers.c b/src/hw/tpm_drivers.c
index 13ad821..da8bb63 100644
--- a/src/hw/tpm_drivers.c
+++ b/src/hw/tpm_drivers.c
@@ -86,6 +86,11 @@ static u32 wait_reg8(u8* reg, u32 time, u8 mask, u8 expect)
return rc;
}
+static u32 tis_wait_access(u8 locty, u32 time, u8 mask, u8 expect)
+{
+ return wait_reg8(TIS_REG(locty, TIS_REG_ACCESS), time, mask, expect);
+}
+
static u32 tis_wait_sts(u8 locty, u32 time, u8 mask, u8 expect)
{
return wait_reg8(TIS_REG(locty, TIS_REG_STS), time, mask, expect);
@@ -102,7 +107,13 @@ static u32 tis_probe(void)
if (!CONFIG_TCGBIOS)
return 0;
- u32 rc = 0;
+ /* Wait for the interface to report it's ready */
+ u32 rc = tis_wait_access(0, TIS_DEFAULT_TIMEOUT_A,
+ TIS_ACCESS_TPM_REG_VALID_STS,
+ TIS_ACCESS_TPM_REG_VALID_STS);
+ if (rc)
+ return 0;
+
u32 didvid = readl(TIS_REG(0, TIS_REG_DID_VID));
if ((didvid != 0) && (didvid != 0xffffffff))
--
2.14.3
_______________________________________________
SeaBIOS mailing list
SeaBIOS@seabios.org
https://mail.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/seabios
On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 02:17:10PM -0500, Stephen Douthit wrote:
> This is based on wait_startup() from the Linux tpm_tis driver.
>
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Douthit <stephend@silicom-usa.com>
> Tested-by: Stephen Douthit <stephend@silicom-usa.com>
> ---
> src/hw/tpm_drivers.c | 13 ++++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/src/hw/tpm_drivers.c b/src/hw/tpm_drivers.c
> index 13ad821..da8bb63 100644
> --- a/src/hw/tpm_drivers.c
> +++ b/src/hw/tpm_drivers.c
> @@ -86,6 +86,11 @@ static u32 wait_reg8(u8* reg, u32 time, u8 mask, u8 expect)
> return rc;
> }
>
> +static u32 tis_wait_access(u8 locty, u32 time, u8 mask, u8 expect)
> +{
> + return wait_reg8(TIS_REG(locty, TIS_REG_ACCESS), time, mask, expect);
> +}
> +
> static u32 tis_wait_sts(u8 locty, u32 time, u8 mask, u8 expect)
> {
> return wait_reg8(TIS_REG(locty, TIS_REG_STS), time, mask, expect);
> @@ -102,7 +107,13 @@ static u32 tis_probe(void)
> if (!CONFIG_TCGBIOS)
> return 0;
>
> - u32 rc = 0;
> + /* Wait for the interface to report it's ready */
> + u32 rc = tis_wait_access(0, TIS_DEFAULT_TIMEOUT_A,
> + TIS_ACCESS_TPM_REG_VALID_STS,
> + TIS_ACCESS_TPM_REG_VALID_STS);
> + if (rc)
> + return 0;
> +
Thanks. I was about to commit this when I noticed the above. In the
case where tis_wait_access() fails due to a timeout, shouldn't
tis_probe() return an error indicator instead of success?
-Kevin
_______________________________________________
SeaBIOS mailing list
SeaBIOS@seabios.org
https://mail.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/seabios
On 03/02/2018 11:05 AM, Kevin O'Connor wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 02:17:10PM -0500, Stephen Douthit wrote:
>> This is based on wait_startup() from the Linux tpm_tis driver.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Stephen Douthit <stephend@silicom-usa.com>
>> Tested-by: Stephen Douthit <stephend@silicom-usa.com>
>> ---
>> src/hw/tpm_drivers.c | 13 ++++++++++++-
>> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/src/hw/tpm_drivers.c b/src/hw/tpm_drivers.c
>> index 13ad821..da8bb63 100644
>> --- a/src/hw/tpm_drivers.c
>> +++ b/src/hw/tpm_drivers.c
>> @@ -86,6 +86,11 @@ static u32 wait_reg8(u8* reg, u32 time, u8 mask, u8 expect)
>> return rc;
>> }
>>
>> +static u32 tis_wait_access(u8 locty, u32 time, u8 mask, u8 expect)
>> +{
>> + return wait_reg8(TIS_REG(locty, TIS_REG_ACCESS), time, mask, expect);
>> +}
>> +
>> static u32 tis_wait_sts(u8 locty, u32 time, u8 mask, u8 expect)
>> {
>> return wait_reg8(TIS_REG(locty, TIS_REG_STS), time, mask, expect);
>> @@ -102,7 +107,13 @@ static u32 tis_probe(void)
>> if (!CONFIG_TCGBIOS)
>> return 0;
>>
>> - u32 rc = 0;
>> + /* Wait for the interface to report it's ready */
>> + u32 rc = tis_wait_access(0, TIS_DEFAULT_TIMEOUT_A,
>> + TIS_ACCESS_TPM_REG_VALID_STS,
>> + TIS_ACCESS_TPM_REG_VALID_STS);
>> + if (rc)
>> + return 0;
>> +
>
> Thanks. I was about to commit this when I noticed the above. In the
> case where tis_wait_access() fails due to a timeout, shouldn't
> tis_probe() return an error indicator instead of success?
tis_probe() returns 0 for no device, '1' for device present.
Take a look at the usage in tpmhw_probe(), or the comment on
tis_probe() itself.
Thanks,
Steve
_______________________________________________
SeaBIOS mailing list
SeaBIOS@seabios.org
https://mail.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/seabios
On Fri, Mar 02, 2018 at 11:27:46AM -0500, Stephen Douthit wrote:
> On 03/02/2018 11:05 AM, Kevin O'Connor wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 02:17:10PM -0500, Stephen Douthit wrote:
> > > This is based on wait_startup() from the Linux tpm_tis driver.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Stephen Douthit <stephend@silicom-usa.com>
> > > Tested-by: Stephen Douthit <stephend@silicom-usa.com>
> > > ---
> > > src/hw/tpm_drivers.c | 13 ++++++++++++-
> > > 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/src/hw/tpm_drivers.c b/src/hw/tpm_drivers.c
> > > index 13ad821..da8bb63 100644
> > > --- a/src/hw/tpm_drivers.c
> > > +++ b/src/hw/tpm_drivers.c
> > > @@ -86,6 +86,11 @@ static u32 wait_reg8(u8* reg, u32 time, u8 mask, u8 expect)
> > > return rc;
> > > }
> > > +static u32 tis_wait_access(u8 locty, u32 time, u8 mask, u8 expect)
> > > +{
> > > + return wait_reg8(TIS_REG(locty, TIS_REG_ACCESS), time, mask, expect);
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > static u32 tis_wait_sts(u8 locty, u32 time, u8 mask, u8 expect)
> > > {
> > > return wait_reg8(TIS_REG(locty, TIS_REG_STS), time, mask, expect);
> > > @@ -102,7 +107,13 @@ static u32 tis_probe(void)
> > > if (!CONFIG_TCGBIOS)
> > > return 0;
> > > - u32 rc = 0;
> > > + /* Wait for the interface to report it's ready */
> > > + u32 rc = tis_wait_access(0, TIS_DEFAULT_TIMEOUT_A,
> > > + TIS_ACCESS_TPM_REG_VALID_STS,
> > > + TIS_ACCESS_TPM_REG_VALID_STS);
> > > + if (rc)
> > > + return 0;
> > > +
> >
> > Thanks. I was about to commit this when I noticed the above. In the
> > case where tis_wait_access() fails due to a timeout, shouldn't
> > tis_probe() return an error indicator instead of success?
>
> tis_probe() returns 0 for no device, '1' for device present.
>
> Take a look at the usage in tpmhw_probe(), or the comment on
> tis_probe() itself.
Okay, thanks for clarifying.
-Kevin
_______________________________________________
SeaBIOS mailing list
SeaBIOS@seabios.org
https://mail.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/seabios
On 02/27/2018 02:17 PM, Stephen Douthit wrote:
> This is based on wait_startup() from the Linux tpm_tis driver.
>
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Douthit <stephend@silicom-usa.com>
> Tested-by: Stephen Douthit <stephend@silicom-usa.com>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Berger <stefanb@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> ---
> src/hw/tpm_drivers.c | 13 ++++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/src/hw/tpm_drivers.c b/src/hw/tpm_drivers.c
> index 13ad821..da8bb63 100644
> --- a/src/hw/tpm_drivers.c
> +++ b/src/hw/tpm_drivers.c
> @@ -86,6 +86,11 @@ static u32 wait_reg8(u8* reg, u32 time, u8 mask, u8 expect)
> return rc;
> }
>
> +static u32 tis_wait_access(u8 locty, u32 time, u8 mask, u8 expect)
> +{
> + return wait_reg8(TIS_REG(locty, TIS_REG_ACCESS), time, mask, expect);
> +}
> +
> static u32 tis_wait_sts(u8 locty, u32 time, u8 mask, u8 expect)
> {
> return wait_reg8(TIS_REG(locty, TIS_REG_STS), time, mask, expect);
> @@ -102,7 +107,13 @@ static u32 tis_probe(void)
> if (!CONFIG_TCGBIOS)
> return 0;
>
> - u32 rc = 0;
> + /* Wait for the interface to report it's ready */
> + u32 rc = tis_wait_access(0, TIS_DEFAULT_TIMEOUT_A,
> + TIS_ACCESS_TPM_REG_VALID_STS,
> + TIS_ACCESS_TPM_REG_VALID_STS);
> + if (rc)
> + return 0;
> +
> u32 didvid = readl(TIS_REG(0, TIS_REG_DID_VID));
>
> if ((didvid != 0) && (didvid != 0xffffffff))
_______________________________________________
SeaBIOS mailing list
SeaBIOS@seabios.org
https://mail.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/seabios
© 2016 - 2025 Red Hat, Inc.