From nobody Sat May 10 05:31:02 2025 Delivered-To: importer2@patchew.org Received-SPF: pass (zohomail.com: domain of vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; envelope-from=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; helo=vger.kernel.org; Authentication-Results: mx.zohomail.com; dkim=fail; spf=pass (zohomail.com: domain of vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1607584529; cv=none; d=zohomail.com; s=zohoarc; b=k4iKGQvlPU1uexW4W+iOL92eV7ImrN7GfZN6qXXo7PVbS5vPhO2224sA6vyuZdf7On+HIiqSNB0nw6WYN1oOjGdqUCuVFf/KdDHs+VrPtkChTYJd3QpBvbxujFJDNYMwLHRl2QR28c5NVMIdchPpnQAEdxv2sAKk/hWexxGfshQ= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=zohomail.com; s=zohoarc; t=1607584529; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Cc:Date:From:List-Id:MIME-Version:Message-ID:Subject:To; bh=AI5SeoejacCczgdU2/tvz99VlW6LkUVH+Sr2RwGLWJU=; b=nN0Tooop33ij6cB43lawNqFEoHSCgxun0WcjPiMwAlGSZ1qBtfAvOuCumxgksgWOaitI5kAFRcmTD4EUwMfzU0YlfGKmavnWn55hXdE1U5bSVEdplVQE1mqdTJH8fm2FT0jMhz05Z301dNry7Z51n/YKEM88Eg4V+gnuQcHa/2g= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.zohomail.com; dkim=fail; spf=pass (zohomail.com: domain of vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mx.zohomail.com with SMTP id 1607584529571280.8697729288042; Wed, 9 Dec 2020 23:15:29 -0800 (PST) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727823AbgLJHOw (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Dec 2020 02:14:52 -0500 Received: from forward106p.mail.yandex.net ([77.88.28.109]:60851 "EHLO forward106p.mail.yandex.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725833AbgLJHOp (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Dec 2020 02:14:45 -0500 Received: from myt6-9be80d028464.qloud-c.yandex.net (myt6-9be80d028464.qloud-c.yandex.net [IPv6:2a02:6b8:c12:5219:0:640:9be8:d02]) by forward106p.mail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTP id 8DC261C83CF3; Thu, 10 Dec 2020 10:06:19 +0300 (MSK) Received: from iva8-b81aeb0c8234.qloud-c.yandex.net (iva8-b81aeb0c8234.qloud-c.yandex.net [2a02:6b8:c0c:da9:0:640:b81a:eb0c]) by myt6-9be80d028464.qloud-c.yandex.net (mxback/Yandex) with ESMTP id VgOqERvMqT-6JDCaftZ; Thu, 10 Dec 2020 10:06:19 +0300 Received: by iva8-b81aeb0c8234.qloud-c.yandex.net (smtp/Yandex) with ESMTPSA id WTdnBhyMCe-6InWjpBE; Thu, 10 Dec 2020 10:06:18 +0300 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client certificate not present) X-Greylist: delayed 440 seconds by postgrey-1.27 at vger.kernel.org; Thu, 10 Dec 2020 02:14:38 EST DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=maquefel.me; s=mail; t=1607583979; bh=AI5SeoejacCczgdU2/tvz99VlW6LkUVH+Sr2RwGLWJU=; h=Date:Subject:To:From:Message-Id:Cc; b=g/bl7xl5/6VCSn2OV5r88PPvdnECzRtjR4ByUoBQBlB4EM140e0PiB4Y8eZ3nCTl1 HLlcWBs2bmSANoCvuD/F/CSTf9r05OeCYkCWw9QuGVPaSOtNivjZub0cQIF8s0hOgQ LoIVv8dONfI4EgW/HCU27qUR4BvH1m6nHUR1fTFc= Authentication-Results: myt6-9be80d028464.qloud-c.yandex.net; dkim=pass header.i=@maquefel.me From: Nikita Shubin Cc: Nikita Shubin , Linus Walleij , Bartosz Golaszewski , Maulik Shah , linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH] gpiolib: irq hooks: fix recursion in gpiochip_irq_unmask Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2020 10:05:14 +0300 Message-Id: <20201210070514.13238-1-nikita.shubin@maquefel.me> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.26.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable To: unlisted-recipients:; (no To-header on input) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org X-ZohoMail-DKIM: fail (Header signature does not verify) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" irqchip shared with multiple gpiochips, leads to recursive call of gpiochip_irq_mask/gpiochip_irq_unmask which was assigned to rqchip->irq_mask/irqchip->irq_unmask, these happens becouse of only irqchip->irq_enable =3D=3D gpiochip_irq_enable is checked. Let's add an additional check to make sure shared irqchip is detected even if irqchip->irq_enable wasn't defined. Fixes: a8173820f441 ("gpio: gpiolib: Allow GPIO IRQs to lazy disable") Signed-off-by: Nikita Shubin --- drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c index 589eceecf374..5ce0c14c637b 100644 --- a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c @@ -1419,7 +1419,8 @@ static void gpiochip_set_irq_hooks(struct gpio_chip *= gc) if (WARN_ON(gc->irq.irq_enable)) return; /* Check if the irqchip already has this hook... */ - if (irqchip->irq_enable =3D=3D gpiochip_irq_enable) { + if (irqchip->irq_enable =3D=3D gpiochip_irq_enable || + irqchip->irq_mask =3D=3D gpiochip_irq_mask) { /* * ...and if so, give a gentle warning that this is bad * practice. --=20 2.26.2