On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 10:20:52AM +0200, Michal Privoznik wrote:
> Our virObject code relies heavily on the fact that the first
> member of the class struct is type of virObject (or some
> derivation of if). Let's check for that.
>
> Signed-off-by: Michal Privoznik <mprivozn@redhat.com>
> ---
> src/util/virobject.h | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/src/util/virobject.h b/src/util/virobject.h
> index 128d3ba2d2..e174c17eb8 100644
> --- a/src/util/virobject.h
> +++ b/src/util/virobject.h
> @@ -76,10 +76,12 @@ virClassPtr virClassForObjectRWLockable(void);
> # endif
>
> # define VIR_CLASS_NEW(prnt, name) \
> + verify(offsetof(name, parent) == 0); \
> if (!(name##Class = virClassNew(prnt, #name, sizeof(name), name##Dispose))) \
> return -1;
>
> # define VIR_CLASS_NEW_GOTO(prnt, name, label) \
> + verify(offsetof(name, parent) == 0); \
> if (!(name##Class = virClassNew(prnt, #name, sizeof(name), name##Dispose))) \
> goto label;
With the suggestion in my previous patch, you wuold need to use
verify_expr() instead of verify, to allow VIR_CLASS_NEW to be used
in an expression.
Regards,
Daniel
--
|: https://berrange.com -o- https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
|: https://libvirt.org -o- https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
|: https://entangle-photo.org -o- https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|
--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list