When compiling this file with -Wshadow=local , we get:
../tests/qtest/m48t59-test.c: In function ‘bcd_check_time’:
../tests/qtest/m48t59-test.c:195:17: warning: declaration of ‘s’
shadows a previous local [-Wshadow=local]
195 | long t, s;
| ^
../tests/qtest/m48t59-test.c:158:17: note: shadowed declaration is here
158 | QTestState *s = m48t59_qtest_start();
| ^
Rename the QTestState variable to "qts" which is the common
naming for such a variable in other tests.
Reported-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20230922163742.149444-1-thuth@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: "Daniel P. Berrangé" <berrange@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
---
tests/qtest/m48t59-test.c | 12 ++++++------
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tests/qtest/m48t59-test.c b/tests/qtest/m48t59-test.c
index 843d2ced8e..9487faff1a 100644
--- a/tests/qtest/m48t59-test.c
+++ b/tests/qtest/m48t59-test.c
@@ -155,7 +155,7 @@ static void bcd_check_time(void)
struct tm *datep;
time_t ts;
const int wiggle = 2;
- QTestState *s = m48t59_qtest_start();
+ QTestState *qts = m48t59_qtest_start();
/*
* This check assumes a few things. First, we cannot guarantee that we get
@@ -173,10 +173,10 @@ static void bcd_check_time(void)
ts = time(NULL);
gmtime_r(&ts, &start);
- cmos_get_date_time(s, &date[0]);
- cmos_get_date_time(s, &date[1]);
- cmos_get_date_time(s, &date[2]);
- cmos_get_date_time(s, &date[3]);
+ cmos_get_date_time(qts, &date[0]);
+ cmos_get_date_time(qts, &date[1]);
+ cmos_get_date_time(qts, &date[2]);
+ cmos_get_date_time(qts, &date[3]);
ts = time(NULL);
gmtime_r(&ts, &end);
@@ -207,7 +207,7 @@ static void bcd_check_time(void)
g_assert_cmpint(ABS(t - s), <=, wiggle);
}
- qtest_quit(s);
+ qtest_quit(qts);
}
/* success if no crash or abort */
--
2.41.0